Foreign Divorce Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mark v Mark

A

H and W were Nigerian nationals, had established matrimonial home in England, W overstayed her visa in the UK. Had W been habitually resident for the last 12 months? Yes, need not be lawful, court had jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

El Fadl v El Fadl

A

No necessity that W have notice of Talaq for it to have effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Solovyev v Solovyev

A

Divorce obtained at Russian consulate could not be recognised under English law because under FLA 1986 events culminating in divorce occured in London and divorce was therefore obtained in the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ivleva v Yates

A

W initiated divorce in Ukraine, H in UK. W gave Ukrainian court incorrect information that H could not be found, did not convey him information. Ukrainian court not informed of UK proceedings. Ultimately no disadvantage to H of recognising foreign divorce, they were to be divorced anyway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dukali v Lamrani

A

Marriage conducted at Moroccan consulate didn’t adhere to formalities, W filed for divorce in UK, H in Morocco. Held - marriage was non-existent under 1984 Act, could not apply for financial relief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sharbatly v Shagroon

A

Approving Dukali, H appealed against W’s application for relief under 1984 Act, no valid UK marriage. W’s divorce petitions amended to nullity petition, financial settlement reached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Berkovits

A

Transnational divorce by “Get”, written in London and delivered to wife in Israel. According to s46(1) divorce must be recognised in country in which it was obtained. Was recognised in Israel but not UK, must be valid in both places.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quazi

A

Talaq recognised under 1971 Act, no capacity for wife to then start divorce proceedings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A v L

A

Non-recognition of divorce due to lack of notice and involvement, but not dishonesty or deceit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Golubvich v Golubvich

A

Husband invented Russian divorce decree and obtained one despite UK injunction, still recognised, Russian court were aware of UK order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Agbaje v Agbaje

A

Overseas divorce, financial provision under 1984 Act? Disparity of outcome not enough, need not be hardship or injustice, nor exceptionality. Primary consideration is children, UK award is ceiling, meet spouses’ reasonable needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Chaudhary

A

For talaq divorces, requirement of some involvement of a state official that is more than merely probative - requires a degree of formality, bare talaq would not suffice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly