for stupid work thing Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What act (and section) is ABH triable under

A

S47 Offences Against the Person Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which classification of crime is ABH

A

triable-either-way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define ABH (original vague definition)

A

Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Assault (in the context of ABH)

A

An assault or battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Occasioning (in the context of ABH)

A

the assault/battery causes the ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What constitutes Actual Bodily Harm

A

“not so trivial” harm, unconsciousness, measurable psychiatric illness, hair cutting (but a lot)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the ruling of Miller (1954)

A

ABH is deemed “any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the ruling of R v Chan Fook (1994)

A

“Actual” means “not so trivial as to be wholly insignificant” and “mere emotions” are not ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the ruling of T v DPP (2003)

A

Unconsciousness (even briefly) is ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the ruling of DPP v Smith (Michael) (2006)

A

Cutting a substantial amount of hair is ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the ruling of R v Burstow (1997)

A

Recognisable psychiatric illness is ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the ruling of R v Roberts (1971)

A

The mens rea of a common assault is the same as for ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the ruling of R v Savage (1991)

A

Common assault Mens Rea is sufficient for ABH, transferred malice also applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define ABH (new definition that doesn’t suck)

A

An assault or battery that causes actual bodily harm to the victim and D intends or is subjectively reckless as to whether the victim fears unlawful force or is actually subjected to unlawful force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly