FO: Unlawful Act Manslaughter Flashcards

1
Q

Voluntary Manslaughter?

A
  • D commits murder but relies on a partial defence (diminished responsibility or loss of control)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Involuntary Manslaughter?

A
  • D has caused the death but there is no MR for murder
  • ACT = UDAM
  • OMMISION = GNM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actus Reus?

A
  • An unlawful act which is dangerous which causes death
  • omission will not suffice
  • Unlawful act must be fully proved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unlawful Act: R v Lamb 1967?

A
  • Two boys were playing with gun and didn’t think it would fire. D pointed the gun at his friend and the gun fired , killing his friend.
  • D charged with Unlawful Act Manslaughter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Test for dangerousness?

A
  • R v Church 1966
  • Unlawful act must be considered dangerous
  • objective test - ordinary reasonable person would see a risk of some harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Church?

A
  • D took V to a van for sexual purposes. V mocked D and slapped him. D knocked V unconscious. Unable to revive her, he panicked and threw her into a river. V drowned.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main points?

A
  • Was the risk of harm obvious (victim to be considered)
  • Assault can be considered dangerous but needs explanation where the act itself may cause the harm
  • The v must have died from some harm which an ordinary person would foresee from the physical act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Manslaughter by supplying drugs?

A
  • R v Kennedy 2007 ( current position)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Kennedy 2007 ?

A
  • V asked D to supply him with heroin
  • D filled a syringe and gave it to V, who injected himself
  • V died by inhalation of gastric contents while acutely intoxicated by opiates and alcohol
  • HoL acquitted as fully informed adult injected himself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mens rea?

A
  • Its the mens rea for the unlawful act which is either intent or subjective recklessness
  • therefore no need to prove mens rea as regards the death or some harm, only the unlawful act
  • Transferred malice rule applies - R v Mitchell 1985
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Mitchell 1985?

A
  • D tried to jump the queue in a busy post office, another man S objected and D hit S, causing him to fall against several other people including an elderly woman (V)
  • ## V suffered a broken femur and died in hospital a few days later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly