Fluid & Electrolytes Flashcards
What is the distribution of Total Body Fluids?
TBF = 50-60% of body weight > 60% ICF + 40% ECF
> ECF = 75% interstitial + 25% intravascular
Which fluids are crystalloids and colloids?
Crystalloids:
- D5W, D10W, D20W
- Nacl 0.9%, Nacl 0.45%, Nacl 3%
- Hartmann
- Lactate Ringer
- Plastmalyte
- D5/Nacl 0.2%, D5/Nacl 0.45%, D5/Nacl 0.9%
Colloids:
- Albumin 5%, 25%
- Dextran
- Gelafusin
- Hetastart
Pros and cons btw crystalloids and colloids?
Crystalloids:
- small molecules (water, Na+, Cl-, Dextrose)
- expands intravascular volume, but also partitions into interstitial spaces
- cheap and readily available
- larger total volume required
- shorter duration of action
Colloids:
- large molecules (albumin)
- expands intravascular volume by drawing fluids from interstitial space
- expensive
- smaller total volume required
- longer duration of action
- allergy reactions, renal toxicity, coagulation disturbances, interfere with cross matching
what is the physiological osmolarity of plasma?
295-310 mOsm/kg
Nacl
- what is the indication?
- pros?
- cons?
Indication: treat low ECF e.g. volume depletion from haemorrhage, shock, mild hypoNa
Pros:
- Max volume expansion: 20-25%
- Duration of action: 1-4h
- Fluid of choice for resuscitation
Cons:
- High Cl- content > may cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis > hyperkalemia
Dextrose
- what is the indication?
- pros?
- cons?
Indication:
- D5W: used to treat Hypernatremia, hypotonic
- D10W & D20W: hypertonic, provides free water and calories
- D50W: treat severe hypoglycaemia - give as 10ml IV bolus
MOA: dextrose is metabolised to water and CO2 –> eqv to “free” water
Cons:
- incr risk of hyperglycaemia
- NOT for fluid resuscitation, wont remain in IV space > water can cross membranes and evenyl distribute in TBF
- cross cerebral cells > elevated intracranial pressure
Hartmann solution:
- what is the indication?
- pros?
- cons?
Indication:
- fluid resus in burns and trauma, blood loss, hypovolemia due to third space shifts
MOA: goes into both IV and interstitial space > useful for fluid resus + maintenance
Pros:
- physiologically adaptable fluid
- sodium lactate: alkalinizing agent metabolised to bicarbonate and water
- has physiologic Cl content»_space; adv over NS (so does not cause HyperCl Metabolic Acidosis)
Cons:
- Alkalosis
- Severe liver impairment
- contains Calcium with chelates with drugs
Plasmalyte?
Compared to HM:
- Higher osmolarity > more suitable for neuro pt
- less Cl content than HM and NS
- contains Mg
Plasmalyte/HM vs NS - which is better?
- Plasmalyte/HM: less incidence of death, RRT/AKI in critically and non-critically ill patients
- Plasmalyte has more physiological plamsa Cl & pH than NS»_space; less risk of hyperCl metabolic acidosis & less rise of SCr
Albumin 5%
- what is the indication?
- MOA?
- pros?
- cons?
Indication:
- Fluid resus/maintenance
MOA: albumin is retained in IV compartment and creates colloidal osmotic pressure (oncotic pressure) > fluids travel from interstitial space to IV space > expansion of IV space
Pros:
- long duration of action compared to NS > 12-24h
Cons:
- Na and Cl content is higher than Nacl > greater risk of hyperCl metabolic acidosis
Albumin 25%
- what is the indication?
- MOA?
- pros?
- cons?
Hypertonic (compared to 5% Alb)
Indication:
- pooling of third spacing e.g. anascara. ascites
- post paracentesis in ascites
NOT used for fluid resus
Fluid Resuscitation: what is the initial management?
500-1000ml BOLUS over 30-60min
Choice of fluids: NS, HM, Albumin 5% > ISOTONIC fluids
the process is continued until SnS of IV volume depletion are improving
What fluid should NOT be used for fluid resus?
D5W
- is rapidly metabolised into water and CO2
- water is free to cross any membrane in the body
i.e. when 1L of D5W is administered IV, only ~500ml of fluid remains in the IV compartment
In neuro pts, with elevated intracranial pressure, D5W may result in “free” water crossing into cerebral cells > cerebral edema > further elevating ICP :(
NS vs Albumin 5%–Which is better for fluid resus?
Theoretical advantage of Albumin vs 0.9% NaCl?
1) Stays in IV space, exert oncotic pressure
2) Volume expanding effect much greater than 0.9% NaCl
SAFE study:
Neither albumin or 0.9% NaCl was proven superior in critically ill patients for fluid resuscitation (no difference in mortality)
Among critically ill patients with TBI, fluid resuscitation with albumin was associated with higher mortality rates than was resuscitation with 0.9% NaCl.
Conclusion: Dr’s preference, cost issues
- colloids carry an incr risk of anaphylaxis
Crystalloids vs colloids for fluid resus?
CRISTAL RCT:
NO significant difference in 28-day mortality. 90-day slightly favoured use of colloids
Cochrane study:
LITTLE to NO difference in mortality