Flaws Flashcards

1
Q

Define ‘Tu Quoque’

A

An attempt to justify an action on the basis that someone else is doing it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define ‘Hasty Generalisation’

A

Draws a general conclusion from insufficient evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Sweeping generalisation’

A

A generalisation that moves from some or many to all, creating a stereotype.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define ‘unwarranted assumption of a casual relationship,’

A

Reasoning that assumes a casual connection without good reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define ‘confusing correlation and cause’ and ‘post hoc’

A

Assuming one thing causes the other.

Post hoc is where A happened before B, therefore A causes B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define ‘Oversimplifying cause and effect’

A

Oversimplifying the cause, disregarding other explanations or solutions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define ‘confusing cause and effect’

A

Treating the cause as the effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define ‘restricting the options’

A

Presents a limited picture of choices available in a situation in order to support one particular option.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define ‘slippery slope’

A

Reasons from one possibility, through a series of events that are not properly or logically linked, to an extreme consequence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define ‘circular argument’

A

An argument in which one of the reasons is the same as the conclusion, or you have to assume the conclusion is correct for the reasons to make sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define ‘confusing necessary and sufficient conditions’

A

An argument that assumes that a necessary condition is also sufficient or vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define ‘ad hominem’

A

A form of reasoning that dismisses the opposing view, by attacking the person rather than addressing their reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define ‘straw person’

A

This flaw misrepresents or distorts an opposing view in order to dismiss it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define ‘conflation’

A

Bringing together two or more different concepts and treating them as the same thing.

Obease and unfit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define ‘Arguing from one thing to another’

A

Reasoning which uses a reason about one thing to support a conclusion about something different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define ‘Two wrongs don’t make a right’

A

A flaw that attempts to justify one harmful thing on the basis of another, different harmful thing.

Just because someone else does a bad thin doesn’t mean you should.