Fixed Assets COPY Flashcards
Which of the following is a required footnote disclosure on property, plant, and equipment?
- Range of useful lives of plant assets.
- Depreciation methods of plant assets.
- Accumulated depreciation related to plant assets.
- All of the above.
All of the above.
All items listed are required disclosures: useful life, depreciation methods, and the accumulated depreciation of plant asset. Read through select disclosures of the financial statements of real companies-this will help reinforce the disclosure requirements and jog your memory because you will remember reading about the disclosure.
Land was purchased to be used as the site for the construction of a plant. A building on the property was sold and removed by the buyer so that construction on the plant could begin.
The proceeds from the sale of the building should be:
- Classified as other income.
- Deducted from the cost of the land.
- Netted against the costs to clear the land and expensed as incurred.
- Netted against the costs to clear the land and amortized over the life of the plant.
Deducted from the cost of the land.
The proceeds from the building removed and sold reduce the cost of the land to the buyer. Had the building been razed, the net razing cost would be added to the land. Compared to the latter situation, the case in the problem results in a cost savings.
On December 1, 2005, East Co. purchased a tract of land as a factory site for $300,000. The old building on the property was razed and salvaged materials resulting from demolition were sold.
Additional costs incurred and salvage proceeds realized during December 2005 were as follows:
- Cost to raze old building $25,000
- Legal fees for purchase contract and to record ownership $5,000
- Title guarantee insurance $6,000
- Proceeds from sale of salvaged materials $4,000
In East’s December 31, 2005 Balance Sheet, what amount should be reported as land?
- $311,000
- $321,000
- $332,000
- $336,000
$332,000
The correct answer, $332,000, equals: $300,000 + $25,000-$4,000 + $5,000 + $6,000.
The net cost to raze the old building ($21,000) is capitalized to land because it is a cost necessary to bring the land into its intended condition. The legal fees and title guarantee cost, likewise, must be incurred to avoid future legal problems, and thus contribute to the value of the land.
Newt Co. sold a warehouse and used the proceeds to acquire a new warehouse. The excess of the proceeds over the carrying amount of the warehouse sold should be reported as a(an):
- Reduction of the cost of the new warehouse.
- Gain from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.
- Part of continuing operations.
- Extraordinary gain, net of taxes.
Part of continuing operations.
The gain or loss on the sale of an asset is part of continuing operations as it is expected that a company will sell existing assets from time to time as the assets are replaced.
Lano Corp.’s forestland was condemned for use as a national park. Compensation for the condemnation exceeded the forestland’s carrying amount. Lano purchased similar, but larger, replacement forestland for an amount greater than the condemnation award.
As a result of the condemnation and replacement, what is the net effect on the carrying amount of the forestland reported in Lano’s Balance Sheet?
- The amount is increased by the excess of the replacement forestland’s cost over the condemned forestland’s carrying amount.
- The amount is increased by the excess of the replacement forestland’s cost over the condemnation award.
- The amount is increased by the excess of the condemnation award over the condemned forestland’s carrying amount.
- No effect, because the condemned forestland’s carrying amount is used as the replacement forestland’s carrying amount.
The amount is increased by the excess of the replacement forestland’s cost over the condemned forestland’s carrying amount.
The two transactions are not related. The land account is decreased by the book value of the land condemned and increased by the cost of the land purchased. The relative magnitudes of the book values are shown below:
- award > book value of condemned land
- cost of new land > award
Therefore: cost of new land > book value of condemned land
Thus, the land is increased by the net amount: cost of new land-book value of old land
Derby Co. incurred costs to modify its building and to rearrange its production line. As a result, an overall reduction in production costs is expected. However, the modifications did not increase the building’s market value, and the rearrangement did not extend the production line’s life.
Should the building modification costs and the production line rearrangement costs be capitalized?
- Building modification costs
- Production line rearrangement costs
- Building modification costs - YES
- Production line rearrangement costs - YES
The criterion for capitalizing post-acquisition costs is not whether the market value of the overall asset is increased. Rather, the criteria are
- increase in useful life or
- increase in productivity or efficiency including cost reduction.
An overall reduction in production costs meets the second criterion. Therefore, both costs are capitalized rather than immediately expensed.
On December 1, 2005, East Co. purchased a tract of land as a factory site for $300,000. The old building on the property was razed and salvaged materials resulting from demolition were sold.
Additional costs incurred and salvage proceeds realized during December 2005 were as follows:
- Cost to raze old building $25,000
- Legal fees for purchase contract and to record ownership $5,000
- Title guarantee insurance $6,000
- Proceeds from sale of salvaged materials $4,000
In East’s December 31, 2005 Balance Sheet, what amount should be reported as land?
- $311,000
- $321,000
- $332,000
- $336,000
$332,000
The correct answer, $332,000, equals: $300,000 + $25,000-$4,000 + $5,000 + $6,000.
The net cost to raze the old building ($21,000) is capitalized to land because it is a cost necessary to bring the land into its intended condition. The legal fees and title guarantee cost, likewise, must be incurred to avoid future legal problems, and thus contribute to the value of the land.
On December 1, 2005, Boyd Co. purchased a $400,000 tract of land for a factory site. Boyd razed an old building on the property and sold the materials it salvaged from the demolition.
Boyd incurred additional costs and realized salvage proceeds during December 2005 as follows:
- Demolition of old building $50,000
- Legal fees for purchase contract and recording ownership $10,000
- Title guarantee insurance $12,000
- Proceeds from sale of salvaged materials $8,000
In its December 31, 2005, Balance Sheet, Boyd should report a balance in the land account of:
- $464,000
- $460,000
- $442,000
- $422,000
$464,000
- Land purchase price $400,000
- Plus demolition of old building $50,000
- Less salvage proceeds ($8,000)
- Plus title insurance $12,000
- Plus legal fees $10,000
- Equals recorded land cost $464,000
Immediately after a note payable was signed, its present value was $30,000. This note and $20,000 cash were used to acquire a used plant asset at the beginning of the current year. The interest rate implied in the note is 6%. Total interest payments due on the note over its term amount to $4,000. The term exceeds one year. No payments on the note are due during the current year. What amount of interest expense is recognized for the first year (current year) on this note, and what amount is capitalized to the plant asset account?
- Interest Expense
- Capitalized Amount
- Interest Expense - $1,800
- Capitalized Amount - $50,000
The interest expense recognized for the first year is .06($30,000) = $1,800. Although no interest is paid, interest is accrued, increasing the carrying value of the note. The asset is capitalized at $50,000, the sum of cash down payment and present value of the note. The interest over the note term is not capitalized because it does not assist in the process of placing the asset into its intended condition and location.
Young Corp. purchased equipment by making a down payment of $4,000 and issuing a note payable for $18,000. A payment of $6,000 is to be made at the end of each year for three years. The applicable rate of interest is 8%. The present value of an ordinary annuity factor for three years at 8% is 2.58, and the present value for the future amount of a single sum of one dollar for three years at 8% is .735. Shipping charges for the equipment were $2,000, and installation charges were $3,500. What is the capitalized cost of the equipment?
- $19,480
- $21,480
- $24,980
- $27,500
$24,980
The capitalized cost is the sum of the down payment, present value of the note payments, and the shipping and installation charges. $4,000 + $6,000(2.58) $2,000 $3,500 = $24,980. The present value of the three payments required on the note is capitalized, which excludes the interest included in those payments. The two charges are capitalized because they were incurred to place the asset into its intended condition and location.
Oak Co., a newly formed corporation, incurred the following expenditures related to land and building:
- County assessment for sewer lines $2,500
- Title search fees $625
- Cash paid for land with a building to be demolished $135,000
- Excavation for construction of basement $21,000
- Removal of old building $21,000 less salvage of $5,000 = $16,000
At what amount should Oak record the land?
- $138,125
- $153,500
- $154,125
- $175,625
$154,125
The amounts necessary to get the land ready for its intended purpose attach themselves as a part of the total cost of the land. This would be the: $2,500+625+135,000+16,000=$154,125
Two approaches are available for applying interest rates to average accumulated expenditures for the purpose of capitalizing interest. These approaches are called the specific method and the weighted average method. In some cases, these approaches yield the same results. Two situations may be encountered in practice for a specific period:
- average accumulated expenditures exceed total interest bearing debt (principal) and
- the interest rates on all interest bearing debt instruments are the same.
Which situation yields the same results for the two approaches?
- only (1).
- only (2).
- both (1) and (2).
- neither (1) nor (2).
Both 1 and 2.
When average accumulated expenditures exceeds interest bearing debt, all interest for the period is capitalized because all debt could have been avoided if the construction had not taken place. Also, if the interest rates on all debt are the same, then the two approaches yield the same results because, ultimately, only one interest rate is applied to average accumulated expenditures for computing capitalized interest.
A firm began the construction of its new manufacturing facility in January of 20x2. The following expenditures were made on construction in that year:
- Jan. 1 - $40,000
- Mar. 1 - $120,000
- Oct. 31 - $96,000
Debt outstanding the entire year:
- 6%, $60,000 construction loan
- 4%, $90,000 note payable not related to construction
- 6%, $90,000 note payable not related to construction
Compute interest to be capitalized using the weighted average method.
- $6,720
- $12,600
- $8,400
- $8,190
$8,190
Average accumulated expenditures is $156,000 = $40,000 + $120,000(10/12) + $96,000(2/12). This method uses the average interest rate on all interest bearing debt, weighted by principal. That rate is the quotient of the interest on all the debt divided by the principal on all the debt. The rate = ($3,600 + $3,600 + $5,400)/$240,000 = .0525. Interest capitalized = (.0525)$156,000 = $8,190.
During 2004, Bay Co. constructed machinery for its own use and for sale to customers. Bank loans financed these assets both during construction and after construction was complete.
How much of the interest incurred should be reported as interest expense in the 2004 Income Statement?
- Interest incurred for machinery for own use
- Interest incurred for machinery held for sale
- Interest incurred for machinery for own use - interest incurred after completion
- Interest incurred for machinery held for sale - All interest incurred
Sun Co. was constructing fixed assets that qualified for interest capitalization. Sun had the following outstanding debt issuances during the entire year of construction:
- $6,000,000 face value, 8% interest.
- $8,000,000 face value, 9% interest.
None of the borrowings were specified for the construction of the qualified fixed asset. Average expenditures for the year were $1,000,000. What interest rate should Sun use to calculate capitalized interest on the construction?
- 8.00%
- 8.50%
- 8.57%
- 9.00%
8.57%
Neither debt issuances were identified as the construction loan. Therefore, the interest rate must be determined based on the weighted average of the interest on all of the debt outstanding during the year. The calculation is as follows:
$6,000,000 x .08 = $480,000
$8,000,000 x .09 = $720,000
Totals $14,000,000 / $1,200,000
$1,200,000 / $14,000,000 = 8.57%
A company obtained a $300,000 loan with a 10% interest rate on January 1, year 1, to finance the construction of an office building for its own use. Building construction began on January 1, year 1, and the project was not completed as of December 31, year 1. The following payments were made in year 1 related to the construction project:
- January 1 - Purchased land for $120,000
- September 1 - Progress payment to contractor for $150,000
What amount of interest should be capitalized for the year ended December 31, year 1?
- $13,500
- $15,000
- $17,000
- $30,000
$17,000
Interest can be capitalized on the accumulated average expenditures during the year. During year 1 the weighted average expenditures were ($120,000 x 12/12) + ($150,000 x 4/12) = $170,000. Interest is capitalized based on the weighted average expenditures times the interest rate of 10% ($170,000 x .10 = $17,000).
Debt is frequently incurred when plant assets are acquired. For example, debt may be incurred on the purchase of plant assets. Debt may also be incurred during the construction of plant assets. How is the interest in these two cases treated for financial reporting?
- Debt for purchase
- Debt during construction
- Debt for purchase - EXPENSE
- Debt during construction - CAPITALIZE
Interest on debt incurred when purchasing a plant asset, is incurred after the asset has reached its intended condition and location. Therefore, it is expensed as incurred. Debt incurred during the construction of plant assets is considered avoidable and also incurred before the asset has reached its intended condition and location. Therefore, it is capitalized to the asset in the same way material, labor, and overhead are capitalized. The interest is expensed as part of depreciation during the service life of the asset.
Cole Co. began constructing a building for its own use in January 2004. During 2004, Cole incurred interest of $50,000 on specific construction debt and $20,000 on other borrowings. Interest computed on the weighted-average amount of accumulated expenditures for the building during 2004 was $40,000.
What amount of interest cost should Cole capitalize?
- $20,000
- $40,000
- $50,000
- $70,000
$40,000
Capitalized interest is limited to the interest that would have been avoided had the construction not occurred. This is the amount of interest based on average accumulated expenditures.
A firm has spent the last two years constructing a building to be used as the firm’s headquarters. At the end of the first year of construction, the balance of building under construction was $400,000, which includes capitalized interest. During year two, the firm paid $240,000 to the contractor on March 1, and $600,000 on October 1. The building was not finished by the end of the second year. The firm had one loan outstanding all year, an 8%, $3,000,000 construction loan. Compute capitalized interest for year two.
- $28,000
- $240,000
- $60,000
- $65,600
$60,000
Average accumulated expenditures for the second year = $400,000(12/12) + $240,000(10/12) + $600,000(3/12) = $750,000. Interest capitalized = .08($750,000) = $60,000. Note that the interest capitalized in year one is compounded in year two because year one capitalized interest is included in average accumulated expenditures for the second year.
A firm is constructing a warehouse for its own use and purchased the land for the site immediately before beginning construction. Interest is capitalized on which of the following:
- Warehouse
- Land
- Warehouse - YES
- Land - NO
Average accumulated expenditures for year five on a construction project amounted to $70,000. The total cash invested in the project by the end of year five, was $160,000. During year six, the firm spent another $240,000 (total) on the project, uniformly throughout the year. Compute average accumulated expenditures for year six.
- $240,000
- $400,000
- $190,000
- $280,000
$280,000
Average accumulated expenditures is the amount of debt for the annual period that could have been avoided. In this case, the firm has $160,000 already invested in the project at the beginning of year six. That amount represents $160,000 in debt, that could have been avoided for year six if the firm had not been involved in the construction project. The expenditures during year six were incurred evenly. Average accumulated expenditures therefore = $160,000(12/12) + $240,000/2 = $280,000. Also, [$160,000 + ($160,000 + $240,000)]/2 = $280,000.
On June 18, 2005, Dell Printing Co. incurred the following costs for one of its printing presses:
- Purchase of collating and stapling attachment $84,000
- Installation of attachment $36,000
- Replacement parts for overhaul of press $26,000
- Labor and overhead in connection with overhaul $14,000
The overhaul resulted in a significant increase in production. Neither the attachment nor the overhaul increased the estimated useful life of the press. What amount of the above costs should be capitalized?
- $0
- $84,000
- $120,000
- $160,000
$160,000
All four costs should be capitalized because they result in an increase in the productivity of the asset. Costs that increase EITHER the life OR productivity are capitalized. Either type of increase results in enhanced asset values. $160,000 is the sum of the four costs listed.
A building suffered uninsured fire damage. The damaged portion of the building was refurbished with higher quality materials. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the damaged portion are identifiable. To account for these events, the owner should:
- Reduce accumulated depreciation equal to the cost of refurbishing.
- Record a loss in the current period equal to the sum of the cost of refurbishing and the carrying amount of the damaged portion of the building.
- Capitalize the cost of refurbishing, and record a loss in the current period equal to the carrying amount of the damaged portion of the building.
- Capitalize the cost of refurbishing by adding the cost to the carrying amount of the building.
Capitalize the cost of refurbishing, and record a loss in the current period equal to the carrying amount of the damaged portion of the building.
When the cost and accumulated depreciation of a component or portion of a larger asset is identifiable, and that component or portion is replaced, the replacement is treated as two separate transactions:
- disposal of the old component (for zero proceeds in this case, due to the fire damage) and
- purchase of the new component.
Thus, a loss equal to the book value of the old component is recognized for (1) and the amount paid to purchase the new component is capitalized as a separate purchase for (2).
On January 1, 2005, Dix Co. replaced its old boiler. The following information was available on that date:
- Carrying amount of old boiler $8,000
- Fair value of old boiler $2,000
- Purchase and installation price of new boiler $100,000
The old boiler was sold for $2,000. What amount should Dix capitalize as the cost of the new boiler?
- $92,000
- $94,000
- $98,000
- $100,000
$100,000
The disposal of the old boiler and purchase of the new boiler are separate transactions. The loss on disposal has no effect on the capitalized cost of the new boiler, which is recorded at its $100,000 purchase cost.
Net income is understated if, in the first year, estimated salvage value is excluded from the depreciation computation when using the
- Straight-line method
- Production or use method
- Straight-line method - YES
- Production or use method - YES
When salvage value is excluded from the computation of depreciation, excessive depreciation is recognized each year under BOTH methods. Therefore, income is understated for both methods.
Annual depreciation under straight-line is:
(1/n)(cost-salvage)
where n is the number of years in the useful life.
Annual depreciation under the production method is:
(current year production/tot.est.production)(cost-salvage)
On January 2, 2005, Lem Corp. bought machinery under a contract that required a down payment of $10,000, plus 24 monthly payments of $5,000 each, for total cash payments of $130,000.
The cash-equivalent price of the machinery was $110,000. The machinery has an estimated useful life of 10 years and estimated salvage value of $5,000. Lem uses straight-line depreciation.
In its 2005 Income Statement, what amount should Lem report as depreciation for this machinery?
- $10,500
- $11,000
- $12,500
- $13,000
$10,500
The capitalized cost of the equipment is $110,000, not the total of the cash payments to be made. The latter amount includes interest.
Thus, annual depreciation is $10,500:
($110,000-$5,000)/10.
A manufacturing firm purchased used equipment for $135,000. The original owners estimated that the residual value of the equipment was $10,000. The carrying amount of the equipment was $120,000 when ownership transferred. The new owners estimate that the expected remaining useful life of the equipment was 10 years, with a salvage value of $15,000. What amount represents the depreciable base used by the new owners?
- $105,000
- $110,000
- $120,000
- $125,000
$120,000
The purchase price of the asset acquired less its salvage value is the asset’s depreciable cost. In this case, total depreciation on the asset is limited to $120,000 ($135,000 purchase price-$15,000 salvage value). The cost to the seller and the previous salvage value are not relevant to the new owner.
In which of the following situations is the units of production method of depreciation most appropriate?
- An asset’s service potential declines with use.
- An asset’s service potential declines with the passage of time.
- An asset is subject to rapid obsolescence.
- An asset incurs increasing repairs and maintenance with use.
An asset’s service potential declines with use.
This method is most appropriate when the service potential of an asset can be estimated reliably in terms of a physical variable, such as miles to be driven, or number of units of output that can be produced by the asset.
Over time, as more units are produced, the service potential of the asset declines because the total number of units that can be produced is finite. Over time, the number of units that can be produced by the asset in the future declines. The primary causative agent for depreciation under the units of production method is, thus, the actual use of the asset in production.
On January 1, 2005, Brecon Co. installed cabinets to display its merchandise in customers’ stores. Brecon expects to use these cabinets for five years.
Brecon’s 2005 multi-step Income Statement should include:
- One-fifth of the cabinet costs in cost of goods sold.
- One-fifth of the cabinet costs in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
- All of the cabinet costs in cost of goods sold.
- All of the cabinet costs in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
One-fifth of the cabinet costs in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
With a five year life, 1/5 of the cost of the cabinets is expensed as depreciation. The cabinets are not involved in the manufacturing of the goods. Rather, they are used to help sell the merchandise.
Thus, the depreciation is not included in cost of goods sold; rather, it is included in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
What factor must be present to use the units of production (activity) method of depreciation?
- Total units to be produced can be estimated.
- Production is constant over the life of the asset.
- Repair costs increase with use.
- Obsolescence is expected.
Total units to be produced can be estimated.
Without an estimate for total units to be produced, depreciation could not be computed. Annual depreciation under this method is:
(Cost-salvage value)/(Total estimated production).
The quantity in square brackets is the rate of depreciation per unit.
Zahn Corp.’s comprehensive Balance Sheet at December 31, 2005 and 2004 reported accumulated depreciation balances of $800,000 and $600,000, respectively. Property with a cost of $50,000 and a carrying amount of $40,000 was the only property sold in 2005.
Depreciation charged to operations in 2005 was:
- $190,000
- $200,000
- $210,000
- $220,000
$210,000
The accumulated depreciation on the property sold was $10,000 ($50,000 cost less $40,000 carrying value). The sale of property requires that the accumulated depreciation on the property be removed from the accounts.
Thus, the $10,000 amount is a decrease in accumulated depreciation. With an overall increase of $200,000 in accumulated depreciation during the period ($800,000-$600,000), depreciation must have been $210,000 ($200,000 + $10,000).
Carr, Inc. purchased equipment for $100,000 on January 1, 2002. The equipment had an estimated 10-year useful life and a $15,000 salvage value. Carr uses the 200% declining-balance depreciation method. In its 2003 Income Statement, what amount should Carr report as depreciation expense for the equipment?
- $13,600
- $16,000
- $17,000
- $20,000
$16,000
The 200% declining balance depreciation method is also called the double declining balance method or DDB. Because this is a declining balance method, the book value at the beginning of 2003 must be computed, and that is affected by depreciation in 2002. For 2002, depreciation under DDB is 2/10 x $100,000 or $20,000. Note that salvage value is not subtracted when computing depreciation because the “declining balance” is book value. For 2003, depreciation is 2/10 x ($100,000-$20,000) = $16,000 because the book value at the beginning of 2003 is reduced by 2002 depreciation.
Ajax Corp. has an effective tax rate of 30%. On January 1, 2000, Ajax purchased equipment for $100,000. The equipment has a useful life of 10 years. What amount of current tax benefit will Ajax realize during 2000 by using the 150% declining-balance method of depreciation for tax purposes instead of the straight-line method?
- $1,500
- $3,000
- $4,500
- $5,000
$1,500
The two depreciation amounts for 2000, the first service year of the asset, are: SL, $10,000 ($100,000/10); and 150% DB, $15,000 (1.5 x SL amount or 1.50/10 x $100,000). The difference, $5,000 is the excess of the 150% DB deduction over the SL deduction. The tax benefit of the $5,000 excess is $1,500 ($5,000 x .30). The firm will pay $1,500 less in taxes if it uses the 150% DB method compared with the SL method.
On January 1, 1998, Crater, Inc. purchased equipment having an estimated salvage value equal to 20% of its original cost at the end of a 10-year life. The equipment was sold December 31, 2002, for 50% of its original cost.
If the equipment’s disposition resulted in a reported loss, which of the following depreciation methods did Crater use?
- Double declining balance.
- Sum-of-the-years’-digits.
- Straight-line.
- Composite.
Straight-line.
The asset was sold when 1/2 of its useful life was expired. (The asset was used 5 years and had an original useful life of 10 years.) If an asset is sold at a loss, then the book value at the date of sale exceeds the proceeds from sale by the amount of the loss. Let C = original cost, and BV = book value at date of sale.
Then BV-proceeds = loss Proceeds = .50C according to the question data.
Thus, BV-.50C = loss. Thus, BV must exceed 50% of the original cost because BV-.50C is a positive number.
The only method from among those listed in the answer alternatives that leaves a BV greater than 50% of original cost after 50% of the useful life has expired is the SL method. The book value after the fifth year under SL is C-(C-.2C)(5/10) = .6C.
DDB’s book value after five years is much less than 50% of original cost because it is an accelerated method. The same holds for SYD. And under composite methods of depreciation, individual assets do not have a separately recorded book value. When sold, accumulated depreciation is debited for the difference between original cost and proceeds. No gain or loss is recognized. Thus, the composite method could not apply in this question.
A depreciable asset has an estimated 15% salvage value. Under which of the following methods, properly applied, would the accumulated depreciation equal the original cost at the end of the asset’s estimated useful life?
- Straight-line
- Double-declining balance
- Straight-line - NO
- Double-declining balance - NO
Salvage value is the portion of the asset’s cost not subject to depreciation. Total depreciation, under any method, is limited to depreciable cost (cost less salvage value). The declining balance methods do not subtract salvage when computing depreciation. Care must be taken to avoid depreciating an asset beyond salvage value.
Cantor Co. purchased a coal mine for $2,000,000. It cost $500,000 to prepare the coal mine for the extraction of the coal. It was estimated that 750,000 tons of coal would be extracted from the mine during its useful life. Cantor planned to sell the property for $100,000 at the end of its useful life. During the current year, 15,000 tons of coal were extracted and sold.
What would Cantor’s depletion amount be per ton for the current year?
- $2.50
- $2.60
- $3.20
- $3.30
$3.20
The depletion rate is the sum of the cost incurred to acquire the mineral rights, find the minerals, and develop the site less the salvage value, all divided by the estimated number of units of resource expected to be removed from the site.
The depletion rate per ton is ($2,000,000 + $500,000-$100,000)/750,000 = $3.20. This rate is applied to the units removed each period to determine depletion for that period.
As such, it allocates the total cost of the obtaining and developing the resource to each unit of resource removed.
Choose the best association of terms in the natural resources accounting area with the conceptual framework.
- Successful efforts method-matching.
- Full costing method-definition of asset.
- Depletion-fair value accounting.
- Successful efforts method-definition of asset.
Successful efforts method-definition of asset.
The successful efforts method capitalizes only the cost of exploration efforts that locate the resource. As such, only those efforts that yield a probable future benefit are capitalized. This is a direct application of the asset definition, which requires that an asset have a probable future benefit.
A manufacturing firm purchased used equipment for $135,000. The original owners estimated that the residual value of the equipment was $10,000. The carrying amount of the equipment was $120,000 when ownership transferred. The new owners estimate that the expected remaining useful life of the equipment was 10 years, with salvage value of $15,000. What amount represents the depreciable base used by the new owners?
- $105,000
- $110,000
- $120,000
- $125,000
$120,000
The depreciable base is calculated as historical cost to the new owners less the estimated salvage value determined by the new owners. Therefore, this answer is correct, because the depreciable base is equal to $120,000 ($135,000 – $15,000). The carrying value and estimated residual value to the previous owner are ignored.
Saba Co. bought a tract of land, paying $800,000 in cash and assuming an existing mortgage of $200,000. The municipal tax bill disclosed an assessed valuation of $700,000. How much should Saba record as an asset for this land acquisition?
- $600,000
- $700,000
- $800,000
- $1,000,000
$1,000,000
The cost principle requires that assets be recorded at historical cost. The purchased cost is deemed to be an objective measure of fair market value. Therefore, the assessed valuation has no impact on the recorded cost. Historical cost includes all costs incident to the acquisition of the asset. In this case, Saba Co. gave up $800,000 of cash and assumed liabilities of $200,000. The assumption of a liability is the equivalent of a payment of cash. The total amount incurred in acquiring the land was $1,000,000 ($800,000 + $200,000).
An impairment loss for a long-lived asset, which is being used in the operations of a business, is measured by the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its
- Expected undiscounted selling price, less expected costs of disposal.
- Fair value.
- Expected undiscounted future cash flows from use and disposal.
- Fair value less cost to sell.
Fair value.
ASC Topic 360 explains that an impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The fair value of an asset is determined by the guidelines set in ASC Topic 820. Fair value is determined by using the principal or most advantageous market and assumes the asset is used in its highest and best use.
Korn Company incurred the following costs during year 1:
- Modification to the formulation of a chemical product$135,000
- Troubleshooting in connection with breakdowns during commercial production150,000
- Design of tools, jigs, molds and dies involving new technology170,000
- Seasonal or other periodic design changes to existing products185,000
- Laboratory research aimed at discovery of new technology215,000
In its income statement for the year ended December 31, year 1, Korn should report research and development expense of
- $520,000
- $470,000
- $385,000
- $335,000
$520,000
Research and development costs (R&D costs) are defined in ASC Topic 730. It goes on to provide detailed lists of examples of activities that typically would be included in R&D costs and expensed and excluded from R&D costs and possibly capitalized. Among those items listed in ASC Topic 730 as being part of R&D costs are modification of the design of a product or process ($135,000), design of tools, jigs, molds, and dies involving new technology ($170,000) and laboratory research aimed at discovery of a new knowledge ($215,000). These three R&D expenses total $520,000. Included in the items listed in ASC Topic 730 as not being part of R&D costs are troubleshooting breakdowns during production ($150,000) and periodic design changes to existing products ($185,000).
ASC Topic 730 requires R&D costs to be expensed as incurred except for intangibles or fixed assets purchased from others having alternative future uses. These should be capitalized and amortized over their useful life. Thus, the cost of patents and R&D equipment purchased from third parties may be deferred and amortized over the asset’s useful life. Internally developed R&D may not be deferred.
Finally, R&D done under contract for others is not required to be expensed per ASC Topic 730. The costs incurred would be matched with revenue using the completed-contract or percentage-of-completion method.
On January 2, year 1, Parke Corp. replaced its boiler with a more efficient one. The following information was available on that date:
- Purchase price of new boiler $60,000
- Carrying amount of old boiler 5,000
- Fair value of old boiler 2,000
- Installation cost of new boiler 8,000
The old boiler was sold for $2,000. What amount should Parke capitalize as the cost of the new boiler?
- $68,000
- $66,000
- $63,000
- $60,000
$68,000
Generally, fixed assets are recorded at the cost of acquiring the asset and getting it ready for its intended use. In this case, the total cost of the new boiler is $68,000 ($60,000 purchase price + $8,000 installation costs). The information concerning the old boiler does not affect the cost of the new boiler. The only situation where information concerning the old boiler would affect the amount recorded for the new boiler would be if an exchange had taken place. The journal entries are
- Cash 2,000
- Loss on sale 3,000
- Old boiler (net) 5,000
- New boiler 68,000
- Cash 68,000
On June 30, year 2, a fire in Ruffing Company’s plant caused a total loss to a production machine. The machine had a book value of $80,000 at December 31, year 1, and was being depreciated at an annual rate of $10,000. The machine had a fair value of $110,000 at the date of the fire, and Ruffing received insurance proceeds of $100,000 in October year 2. The same month Ruffing purchased a replacement machine for $130,000. Ignoring income taxes, what amount should Ruffing report on its year 2 income statement as involuntary conversion gain or loss?
- $0.
- $10,000 loss.
- $20,000 gain.
- $25,000 gain.
$25,000 gain.
Per ASC 605-40-45-1, a gain (loss) on such conversions should be recognized as the difference between the proceeds and the book value of the converted asset, regardless of whether or not the proceeds are reinvested.
- Proceeds $100,000
- Book value ($80,000 -$5,000)75,000
- Gain $25,000
The book value of $80,000 is decreased by a half-year’s depreciation (1/2 × $10,000 = $5,000) for 12/31/Y1 to 6/30/Y2.
Which type of expenditure occurs when a company installs a higher capacity boiler to heat its plant?
- Rearrangement.
- Ordinary repair and maintenance.
- Addition.
- Betterment.
Betterment (improvement) is the replacement of a major part or component of an existing asset with a significantly better or improved part or component.
An addition is an extension, enlargement, or expansion made to an existing asset.
Crowder Company acquired a tract of land containing an extractable natural resource. Crowder is required by the purchase contract to restore the land to a condition suitable for recreational use after it has extracted the natural resource. Geological surveys estimate that the recoverable reserves will be 5,000,000 tons, and that the land will have a value of $1,000,000 after restoration. Relevant cost information follows:
- Land $9,000,000
- Estimated restoration costs $1,500,000
If Crowder maintains no inventories of extracted material, what should be the charge to depletion expense per ton of extracted material?
- $2.10
- $1.90
- $1.80
- $1.60
$1.90
The depletion computation is
- Net cost of resource / Units of resource = Depletion charge per unit
The estimated net cost is the cost of the land ($9,000,000) and the related restoration costs ($1,500,000), less the salvage value of the land ($1,000,000). This results in a net cost of $9,500,000. The estimated recoverable reserves total 5,000,000 tons. Therefore, the depletion charge is $1.90 per ton ($9,500,000/5,000,000).
- $9,500,000 / 5,000,000 = $1.90
Assume a private firm elects to adopt ASU 2014-08: Business Combinations: Accounting for Intangible Assets in a Business Combination. Can customer names and noncompetition be included as part of goodwill?
- Customer Names
- Noncompetition Agreement
- Customer Names - YES
- Noncompetition Agreement - YES
ASU 2014-18 allows private firms, in a business combination, to measure customer-related intangible assets and noncompetition agreements as part of goodwill.
Which of the following accurately describes the appropriate accounting for goodwill acquired through a business combination?
- It should be recorded at cost and tested for impairment every three years.
- It should be recorded at cost and tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if certain events occur.
- It should be recorded at cost and amortized over a 10-year period.
- It should be recorded at cost and amortized over a 40-year period.
It should be recorded at cost and tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if certain events occur.
Impairment of goodwill. The goodwill assigned to a reporting unit should be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances. These circumstances are listed in the outline of ASC 350-20-35-30. The annual test may be performed any time during the company’s fiscal year as long as it is done at the same time every year. Different reporting units may be tested at different times during the year. The test of impairment is a two-step process as described below.
- Compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed. ASC Topic 820 requires that in determining fair value, a valuation premise should be used that is consistent with the asset’s highest and best use. The valuation premise can either be an in-use or an in-exchange premise. An in-use premise is used if the asset is used in a business in combination with other assets, such as a reporting unit.
- Compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, all assets in the segment are valued in accordance with ASC Topic 805, and the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied goodwill. If the implied value of goodwill is less than its carrying amount, goodwill is written down to its implied value and an impairment loss is recognized.
During year 1, Fox Company made the following expenditures relating to plant machinery and equipment:
- Renovation of a group of machines at a cost of $50,000 to secure greater efficiency in production over their remaining 5-year useful lives. The project was completed on December 31, year 1.
- Continuing, frequent, and low-cost repairs at a cost of $35,000.
- A broken gear on a machine was replaced at a cost of $5,000.
What total amount should be charged to repairs and maintenance in year 1?
- $35,000
- $40,000
- $85,000
- $90,000
$40,000
Generally, a cost should be capitalized if it improves the efficiency of the asset or extends its useful life, and expensed if it merely maintains the asset at its current level. The renovation cost ($50,000) improves the production efficiency of the machines and therefore should be capitalized. However, the continuing, frequent, and low-cost repairs ($35,000) and the replacement of a broken gear ($5,000) merely maintain the assets at their current level, and therefore $40,000 should be charged to repairs and maintenance expense.
Mellow Co. depreciated a $12,000 asset over five years, using the straight-line method with no salvage value. At the beginning of the fifth year, it was determined that the asset will last another four years. What amount should Mellow report as depreciation expense for year 5?
- $600
- $900
- $1,500
- $2,400
$600
According to ASC Topic 250, a change in the estimated life of an asset is accounted for on a prospective basis. Depreciation expense in years 1 through 4 is calculated as $12,000 ÷ 5 years = $2,400 per year. At the end of year 4, the book value of the asset is $2,400 and this amount is depreciated over the newly estimated remaining life of 4 years. Therefore, the depreciation expense in year 5 would be $2,400 ÷ 4 remaining years = $600. Therefore, this answer is correct.
How should NSB, Inc. report significant research and development costs incurred?
- Expense all costs in the year incurred.
- Capitalize the costs and amortize over a five-year period.
- Capitalize the costs and amortize over a 40-year period.
- Expense all costs two years before and five years after the year incurred.
Expense all costs in the year incurred.
Research and Development Costs
- R&D costs are expensed as incurred except for intangibles or fixed assets purchased from others having alternative future uses. These should be capitalized and amortized over their useful life. Thus, the cost of patents and R&D equipment purchased from third parties may be deferred and amortized over the asset’s useful life. Internally developed R&D may not be deferred.
- Finally, R&D done under contract for others is not required to be expensed. The costs incurred would be matched with revenue using the completed-contract or percentage-of-completion method.
Restorations of carrying value for long-lived assets are permitted if an asset’s fair value increases subsequent to recording an impairment loss for which of the following?
- Held for use
- Held for disposal
- Held for use - NO
- Held for disposal - YES
If an asset is held for disposal, previous losses can be recovered. The logic is that the recovery will be realized in the near future if the asset is in the process of being disposed. In contrast, an asset held for use CANNOT recover previous impairment because there is no certainty regarding the ultimate realization of those losses.
A company has a long-lived asset with a carrying value of $120,000, expected future cash flows of $130,000, present value of expected future cash flows of $100,000, and a market value of $105,000. What amount of impairment loss should be reported?
- $0
- $5,000
- $15,000
- $20,000
$0
The recoverable cost (expected future cash flows) of $130,000 exceeds the $120,000 book value. Therefore, the asset is not impaired, and no loss is recorded. Although both the market value and present value of the future cash flows are less than book value, as long as the nominal sum of future cash flows ($130,000) exceeds book value, no impairment is recorded. The firm is expected to recover its book value.
A state government condemned Cory Co.’s parcel of real estate. Cory will receive $750,000 for this property, which has a carrying amount of $575,000. Cory incurred the following costs as a result of the condemnation:
- Appraisal fees to support a $750,000 value $2,500
- Attorney fees for the closing with the state $3,500
- Attorney fees to review contract to acquire replacement property $3,000
- Title insurance on replacement property $4,000
What amount of cost should Cory use to determine the gain on the condemnation?
- $581,000
- $582,000
- $584,000
- $588,000
$581,000
The total value to be compared to the amount received from the government in computing the gain:
- Carrying amount $575,000
- Plus appraisal fees to support a $750,000 value $2,500
- Plus attorney fees for the closing with the state $3,500
- Equals total cost to compare to $750,000 received from state $581,000
The second and third items in the above list essentially reduce the net proceeds from the state and thus decrease the gain. The $3,000 and $4,000 amounts pertaining to the replacement property are not associated with the existing property and do not affect the gain on its condemnation.
Which of the following conditions must exist in order for an impairment loss to be recognized?
- I. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset is less than its fair value.
- II. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable.
II ONLY.
The test for impairment for an asset in use is whether the carrying value (book value) is less than its recoverable cost. An asset’s recoverable cost is the sum of its estimated net cash inflows projected for its remaining life.
When book value > recoverable cost, the carrying value is not recoverable. In other words, the asset is booked at more than the sum of its future net cash inflows.
For example, if an asset’s carrying value is $100 and its recoverable cost is $80, then its carrying value is not recoverable (only $80 is recoverable). The AMOUNT of the loss recognized is the difference between carrying value and fair value, but that difference is not used for TESTING whether an asset is impaired.
That difference is not the condition leading to the impairment loss.