first section Flashcards
which 6 hockett’s design features we touched on in class (and their meanings)
Semanticity:
Language can communicate meaning, and specific signals can be assigned meaning
Arbitrariness:
There is no necessary relationship between
objects in the world and symbols that a
language uses
Productivity:
Language can be used to say things that have
never been said before and yet are understandable to the receiver.
Learnability:
Users of one language can learn to use a
different language
displacement
The communication system can be used to refer to
things remote in time and space
Duality of patterning
Only combinations of otherwise meaningless units are meaningful
out of spanish whistling, baby talking, dog talking which one is a real langauge
spanish whistling
phonetics are ___ sounds and phones are ___ sounds
raw, speech
a ___ is the smallest unit of meaning
morpheme
what order of subject, object, verb does english have
SVO
chompsky thought Language is ____-based, and our knowledge of syntax can be captured in a finite number of ____ rules
rule, syntactic
the study on semantic
week 1 study looked at semantic priming in (what lang/age group)
bilingual todllers
Nativist view on language:
Nativist view: Our genes provide us with capacity for language. it is unique to humans
Anti-nativist view on language:
Language is not an innate instinct, but a by-product of our cognitive abilities
what is Chomsky’s Language Acquisition Device (LAD)
Only humans possess a language acquisition device that enables us to have innate, “hard-wired” abilities to acquire human language, and other animals lack.
does the LAD mean infants are born with the language they are going to speak
no
piaget beleived language/cognition determines language/cognition
cognition, language
sapir-whorf beleived language/cognition determines language/cognition
language, cognition
chompsky beleived language/cognition determines language/cognition
- language is seperate from cognition, which is why animals can do a whole bunch of this stuff
vygotsky beleived language/cognition determines language/cognition
- thinks cognition and language are seperate before you learn to speak, but after socialization cognition and language are interdependent
what are the 3 versions of the sapir-whorf hypothesis and their meanings
The Strong Version (Linguistic determinism)
- Language determines thought.
The Weaker Version (Linguistic Relativity)
- Language affects only perception.
The Weakest Version
- Language affects processing on certain tasks where linguistic encoding is important.
in the vocabulary differentiation study where a language didn’t differentiate numbers after 3, what version of spearwhorf does this align with
strong version
Linguistic typicality effect: meaning and example
one engages more neural recourses to access an atypical member than a typical member of a category.
For example, when talking about birds, you easily access to ‘pigeon’, but harder to ‘penguin’
t/f you have more automatic processing with typical categories
t
t/f there’s the same amount of differentiation in chinese and english between typical and atypical trials
false. english has more differentiation, the brain is being used more for atypical
a study showed that italian speakers grouped together words that belonged to the same gender category (like in french). when the same 2 categories were shown in pictures instead of words, there was no distinction between the groups. what version of spearwhorf does this support and why
supports the weakest version
* when languagge encoding is there you see the effect, when it is not (and pictures are used) its not shown
english is a manner/path language, while greek is a manner/path language
manner, path
the engl/greek manner/path study didnt show differentiation when it was done with a non-linguistic task. what version does this support
supports the weakest version
* when language encoding is there you see the effect, when it is not, its not shown (i tihnk)