First Amendment Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

Braunfeld v. Brown

A

1961

Orthodox Jew can’t open shop on Sunday: law has a secular purpose (restricts FE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sherbert v. Verner

A

1963

Woman can’t be denied unemployment for not working on her Sabbath (est. Sherbert Test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sherbert test

A

Government can’t burden religion unless there’s a compelling state interest & least restrictive means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wisconsin v. Yoder

A

1972

Amish kids don’t have to go to school: high water mark for free exercise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Employment Division v. Smith

A

1990

people can’t use illegal drug for religious purposes, clamps down on religious freedom and reverses Sherbert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RFRA

A

1993

Congress restores Sherbert test, makes it easier for free exercise exemptions to law / govt burdens on religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Marsh v. Chambers

A

1983

NE legislature can open with prayer (historical precedent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Town of Greece v. Galloway

A

2014

town council can open with prayer as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lynch v. Donnelly

A

1984
nativity scene is OK
est. endorsement test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

County of Allegheny v. ACLU

A

1989

religious display is only OK if surrounded by other religions or secular stuff (menorah)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stone v. Graham

A

1980

10 commandments in schools not OK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

McCreary County v. ACLU

A

2005

10 commandments in courthouse not OK even with surrounding objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Van Orden v. Perry

A

2005

10 commandments in TX OK because surrounded by historical artifacts (same day as McCreary and contradicts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lane Photography v. Willock

A

2013

SC doesn’t hear; state ruling says human rights law means photog can’t refuse to photo SSM wedding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hobby Lobby v. Burwell

A

2014

this isn’t the least restrictive means to pursue compelling state interest of giving contraceptives access

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Obergfelle v. Hodges

A

2015

legalizes SSM

17
Q

City of Boerne v. Flores

A

1997
church can’t violate general state zoning laws
RFRA can’t apply to the states

18
Q

Gonzalez v. O Centro Espiritu

A

2006
church can use illegal drug in religious tea
RFRA applied federally, RFRA victory

19
Q

Christian Legal Society v. Martinez

A

2010

student group all-comers policy is OK because neutral for viewpoints

20
Q

Reynolds v. US

A

1879
separates belief and action
polygamy action not protected

21
Q

Cantwell v. Connecticutt

A

1940
JW preaching door to door protected by first amendments
incorporates the free exercise clause to states

22
Q

Minersville v. Gobitis

A

1940
JW kids not saluting flag is not protected - national interest of national unity
departs from Cantwell precedent the same year

23
Q

West Virginia v. Barnette

A

1943
students have the right to refuse to salute flag/pledge —free communication, can’t compel people to believe, fixed star is freedom from govt intervening in public opinion
same situation as Gobitis - reverses

24
Q

Everson v. Board of Education

A

1947
public transport to school program can be used for religious schools - general program
incorporates establishment clause to states

25
McCollum v. Board of Education
1948 | release time program isn't OK - violates est. clause
26
Zorach v. Clauson
1952 | release program is OK if off-campus, not in govt buildings
27
Lemon v. Kurtzman
1971 public funding for materials, teacher salaries in public schools violates est. clause establishes Lemon Test
28
Lemon Test
to not violate the establishment clause, statutes must have a secular purpose, primary effect isn't burdening religion, and can't foster excessive entanglement
29
Engel v. Vitale
1962 | rejects nondenominational voluntary school prayer
30
William v. Jaffree
1985 | moment of silence also violates est. clause
31
Lee v. Weisman
1992 | clergy in public school ceremonies also violate est. clause