First Amendment: Freedom of Religion Flashcards
Two Clauses of Religion
Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause
Govt violates establishment clause if their primary purpose is to advance religion of if effects aid or prohibit religion
Religion Definition
The court never defined what religion is. Will accept any type of assertion that a group is a religion.
Belief Test
Determine whether a given belief is sincere and meaningfully occupies a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by the orthodox belief in God (spiritual, ethical, or moral beliefs that are sincere)
Can’t determine if beliefs are true/false. Only sincere.
Dominant view in a faith are not determinative
Free Exercise clause
- Freedom to believe- absolute constitutional protections against govt regulation of beliefs
- Freedom to Act- qualified protection against regulation of religiously motivated conduct
3 main situtation where FEC arises
- When govt prohibits behavior that a person’s religion requires
- When govt requires conduct that a person’s religion prohibits
- When individuals claim that laws burden observances
Neutral and General applicability
Rational Basis test used when laws are created that are neutral and have general applicability.
Neutral and generally applicable laws are invalid when they infringe upon additional rights as well.
These laws need not be justified by a compelling by a compelling govt interest, even if it has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice
3 theories for establishment clause application
- Strict separation (Jeffersonian)= religion corrupts politics
- Netrality Theory/ Symbolic Endorsement Test: govt must be neutral; can’t favor one religion over another, religion over religion, or vice versa.
- Govt violates EC if it symbolically endorses a particular religion or generally endorses religion over non religion - Accomodation Theory: religion is important and must be accommodated. Establishment clause is only violated if a govt establishes a single church or compels people to follow a particular religion.
Lemon Test
If denominational preference is claimed to exist, the initial inquiry is whether the law facially differientiates among religion. If so, then govt must meet SS, if not, then use the lemon test.
1) Is there a secular legislative purpose? ( 10 commandements in school, a minute of silence for prayer and mandatory creationism classes are uncon. Sunday closing laws are con,)
2. The principal/primary effect of the law must not advance nor inhibt religion
3. The law must not foster an excessive govt entanglement with religion
Religious Groups access to school facilities
Policies preventing student groups from using school facilities for worship is uncon. b/c college created a public forum and exclusion was content based. (SS)
Allowing worship doesn’t violate EC, per lemon test b/c they are open to all students, serves a secular purpose and its effect doesn’t advance religion nor is it seen as a symbolic endorsement or excessive entanglement
Avoiding violation of EC isn’t a compelling govt interest
Student religious groups and govt funding
Funds can’t be precluded to religious student groups that others recieved.
Doesn’t violate EC if the fund program is neutral toward religion
Student Prayers
Prayers at the beginning of football games violated EC.
would appear that the school favors religion or symbolically endorses it
Relgious symbols on govt property
10 commandments display is uncon when the text stands alone, isn’t related to a secular theme, there’s no disclaimer, and the focus is on religious passages
Non uncon when there is a sign indicating who erected it, it conveys a secular message, and it doesn’t stand alone
Religion as part of govt activity
Students allowed to be released for religious instruction only if the instruction occurs off site
Clergy led prayers at graduation, instructor led prayer in classroom, and govt mandated silent prayer are all uncon b/c they contain a form of coercion where students dont feel they can leave. “Silent reflections” and student led prayers at graduation are questionable
It is uncon for states to forbid the teaching of evolution and teach creationism in schools
It is constitutional for states to employ ministers to begin legislative sessions with prayer
Govt Aid to Religion
(Mitchell, plurality opinion 4-2-3) Concurring opinion says aid to parochial schools is permissible so long as it is not actually used for religious purposes. Dissent says uncon. Plurality says aid is fine as long as it doesn’t discriminate against religions
Tax exemption to religious orgs are uncon if they benefit only religion. Must benefit other groups along with religion (charitable and educational institutions are okay)
Three Criteria for aid to parochial schools
- Aid must be available to all students enrolled in public and parochial schools (aid to only parochial is invalid)
- Aid more likely permitted if given directly to students than to the schools
- Aid will be permitted if not actually used for religious instructions.