First Amendment: Freedom of Expression Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Free Expression

A

The First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause prohibits the federal and state governments from enacting laws that unduly restrict an individual’s right to freely communicate information, ideas, and opinions through speech or conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Analysis

A
  1. Determine the category of the speech: Pure or symbolic?
  2. Determine the forum of the speech
  3. Determine the type of regulation
  4. Determine and apply the appropriate standard of review.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prior Restraint, Vagueness, and Overbreadth

A

Most often, a plaintiff will challenge a law as applied, meaning that the law violates the First Amendment as enforced under the facts of the plaintiff’s case. These doctrines also permit facial challenges, i.e., claims that the law as written is so flawed that it must be struck down regardless of any factual context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prior Restraint

A

A prior restraint is a law that prohibits speech before it can take place. Prior restraints are highly disfavored. (injunctions and licensing).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Vagueness

A

A law is unconstitutionally vague if people of common intelligence are forced to guess as to its meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Overbreadth

A

An overbreadth claim asserts that a law, as written, will chill or deter constitutionally protected expression by parties not before the court. A facially overbroad law will be held unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Content-Based Regulation

A

Regulation applicable to a particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea or message expressed.

Test for Content based restrictions: Content based regulations are presumed to be invalid unless the government meets the strict scrutiny test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Content-Neutral

A

Content-neutral regulation must pass intermediate scrutiny. The government has the burden of proof and must prove:

  1. The law advances a significant government interest, and
  2. The means are narrowly tailored.
  3. The law leaves open alternative channels for communicating the information.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Government as a speaker

A

When the government is a speaker, the First Amendment does not apply to it.

The government can engage in content-based choices when it is acting as the speaker (It can favor a position). (Note: License plates are a form of government speech).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prior Restraint: Licensing

A

Criteria that must be met for licensing to be constitutional:

  1. There must be an important reason for the licensing.
  2. There must be clear criteria leaving almost no discretion to the licensing authority.
  3. There must be procedural protections (Prompt decision making, as to whether the speech will be allowed; Adversarial hearings before speech is prevented, and; Judicial Review.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Imminent lawless action test

A

Under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, a state may only regulate speech that advocates violence if the speech is intended and likely to incite imminent illegal activity. 3 Elements:

  1. Intent to incite illegal action
  2. The imminence of the illegal action, and
  3. Likelihood of actual incitement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True Threats

A

True threats are unprotected by the First Amendment and can be criminalized.

Occurs when an individual communicates to a particular individual or group of individuals a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence against them.

Requirements:

  1. There must be a specific target,
  2. Intent to threaten that person, and
  3. Targeted person needs to know of the threat and feel threatened.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Non-Protected Speech

A
  1. Incitement of illegal activity.
  2. Fighting words.
  3. True Threats
  4. Obscenity
  5. Child pornography.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Less-Protected Speech

A
  1. Defamation
  2. Commercial speech
  3. Sexually oriented speech.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Symbolic Speech

A

When conduct is communicative. Factors to determine when conduct is communicative:

  1. Intent to convey a message
  2. Likelihood that the message would be understood by those receiving it.

Examples: Wearing an armband, flag burning, nude dancing, spending money on a political campaign.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Commercial speech

A

Has 3 characteristics:

  1. It is an advertisement of some form,
  2. It refers to a specific product, and
  3. The speaker has an economic motivation for the speech.

If all of these apply, then apply intermediate scrutiny.

17
Q

Symbolic Speech: Content neutral unrelated to the expression

A
  1. Does the regulation advance a substantial government interest?
  2. Is the law narrowly tailored to achieve that interest? And
  3. Does the law leave open alternative channels to communicate the information?
18
Q

Types of Forums

A
  1. Public Forums: Streets/sidewalks/parks.
    Places that have traditionally been used for public speech.
  2. Limited Public Forums: facility that the government opens but its use is limited to either certain groups or for the discussion of certain subjects.
  3. Non-Public Forums: Test (same as limited public forum):
    i. Governmental restriction must be reasonable.
    ii. It may include subject matter restrictions.
    iii. It may not contain viewpoint restrictions.
  4. Designated public forums: To determine if a facility is a designated public forum, the focus is on the intent behind opening the place.
19
Q

Public Forums and Designated public forums

A

If in these forums, ask what type of regulation is occurring:

  1. Content based: strict scrutiny
  2. Content neutral: Intermediate scrutiny.
  3. Prior restraints: Injunctions/licensing.
20
Q

Limited public forums and non-public forums

A

If in these forums, ask what type of regulation is occurring:

  1. The regulation must be reasonable
  2. It may restrict on basis of content.
  3. It may not restrict on basis of viewpoint.
21
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

To pass strict scrutiny, the law or policy must satisfy 3 tests:

  1. It must be justified by a compelling governmental interest (necessary or crucial)
  2. The law or policy must be narrowly tailored to achieve that goal or interest. Cannot be too overbroad or too underinclusive.
  3. The law or policy must be the least restrictive means for achieving that interest: there must not be a less restrictive way to effectively achieve the compelling government interest.

Law is usually found to be Unconstitutional under strict scrutiny.

22
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

In order to overcome the intermediate scrutiny test, it must be shown that the law or policy being challenged furthers an important government interest by means that are substantially related to that interest.

Note: the difference between strict and intermediate scrutiny: Intermediate scrutiny does not require narrowly tailored and least restrictive means to further a government interest.

23
Q

Rational Basis Review

A

Requires that the law or policy be rationally related to a legitimate government interest.

Law is usually found to be Constitutional under the rational basis review.

24
Q

Traditional Public Forums

A

Include public parks, sidewalks and areas that have been traditionally open to political speech and debate. Speakers in these areas enjoy the strongest First Amendment protections.

25
Q

Designated Public Forums

A

Sometimes, the government opens public property for public expression even though the public property is not a traditional public forum. These are designated public forums. After opening a designated public forum, the government is not obligated to keep it open. However, as long as the government does keep the forum open, speech in the forum receives the same First Amendment protections as speech in traditional public forums. Examples of designated public forums include municipal theaters and meeting rooms at state universities.

26
Q

Limited Public Forums

A

A limited forum is a type of a designated public forum. Here, the government limits access to a designated public forum to certain classes or types of speech. In Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98 (2001), the Supreme Court held that in a “limited forum,” the government may discriminate against classes of speakers or types of speech. However, the government is still prohibited from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. For example, the government may limit access to public school meeting rooms by only allowing speakers conducting school-related activities. It may not, however, exclude speakers from a religious group simply because they intend to express religious views.

27
Q

Non-Public Forums

A

Nonpublic forums are forums for public speech that are neither traditional public forums nor designated public forums. According to the Supreme Court in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. __ (2018), in a nonpublic forum, the Government may restrict contents of a speech, as long as the restriction is reasonable and the restriction does not discriminate based on speakers’ viewpoints. Examples of nonpublic forums include airport terminals, a public school’s internal mail system, and a polling place.