First Amendment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Test for regulation of speech in PF or DPF

A
  1. Reasonable TPM restriction
  2. Content-neutral
  3. Narrowly tailored to serve important gov interest (need not be LRM)
  4. Leaves open alternative channels of communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Test for regulation of speech in LPF or NPF

A
  1. Objective of the regulation is to reserve forum for its intended use
  2. Viewpoint neutral
  3. Reasonably related to legitimate gov purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements for speech to be obscene:

A

Taken as a whole by average person:

  1. Appeals to prurient interest in sex (community standard)
  2. Patently offensive (community standard)
  3. Lacks serious value (national reasonable person standard)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Secondary effects exception to obscenity

A

Gov may issue land use or zoning restrictions to limit location/size of adult entertainment establishments if designed to reduce secondary effects of such businesses.

Restrictions must serve a substantial government interest and must not unreasonably limit alternate avenues of communication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Elements of proof of defamation when π is a public official or it involves public concern

A
  1. All elements of defamation
  2. Falsity
  3. Fault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When may the government regulate lawful and non-misleading commercial speech?

A
  1. Serves substantial interest
  2. Directly advances that interest
  3. Narrowly tailored to that interest (need not be LRM – just a reasonable fit)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Requirements for a prior restraint to be valid:

A
  1. Standards narrowly drawn, reasonable, and definite
  2. Injunction must promptly be sought, and
  3. There must be prompt and final determination of validity of restraint

(Burden on gov to show speech is unprotected)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Standard for infringement on freedom of association to be valid:

A
  1. Compelling state interest, unrelated to suppression of ideas
  2. LRM of protecting gov interest
  3. Doesn’t singificantly affect group’s right to express its viewpoints
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2 standards for election laws that impact 1A freedoms of speech, assembly and association

A

If restriction is severe –> NT to achieve CSI

If restriction is reasonable and nondiscriminatory –> RBR, generally upheld

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standard for statute limiting election campaign contributions

A

Intermediate scrutiny

Closely drawn to match a sufficiently important interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What test is used for infringement (freedom of association) cases involving public school sponsorship of extracurricular activities

A

Regulations must be

  1. Viewpoint neutral
  2. Reasonably related to a legitimate gov interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gov action challenged under establishment clause will be invalid unless

(Lemon Test)

A
  1. Has secular purpose
  2. Primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion
  3. Does not produce excessive gov entanglement w/ religion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Standard for overbreadth in regulation of speech

A

Punishes a substantial amount of protected speech in relation to its plainly legitimate sweep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Constitutionality of overbroad spech regulation

A

Facially invalid against ANYONE, unless a court has limited construction of the regulation so as to remove the threat to constitutionally protected speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What standard is applied to injunctions in PFs and DPFs?

A

If content-based, must be necessary to achieve a compelling interest.

If content-neutral, must burden no more speech than necessary to achieve important gov interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What speech is considered “fighting words”?

A
  1. True threats (e.g. cross burning w/ intent to intimidate)
  2. Fighting words (personally abusive, likely to incite immediate phys reaction in average person)
17
Q

When may the government regulate child pornography?

A

The government may prohibit sale/distribution of visual depictions of sexual conduct actually involving minors, even if it doesn’t meet the test for obscenity.

It may not bar visual materials made with CGI or young-looking adults.

18
Q

Validity of injunction prohibiting publishing of troop movements in times ofr war

A

Valid

19
Q

Validity of injunction prohibiting publication of Pentagon Papers because it might have an effect on Vietnam War

A

Invalid

20
Q

Validity of injunction prohibiting grand jury witness from ever disclosing testimony

A

Invalid

21
Q

Limitations on business regulations and taxes on the press and broadcasting companies

A

May be subject to general business regs and taxes, but NOT those that impact press or sub-part of press based on content (e.g. medical journals) abent compelling justification.

22
Q

Standards for regulation of newspapers versus broadcast media

A

Broadcast media is less protected from regulation, so the government may regulate more freely (e.g. prohibit indecent speech, require cable operators to require local stations…). Content-based restrictions are still subject to strict scrutiny.

Generally, all regulations of newspapers are subject to strict scrutiny.

23
Q

Government regulations subject to FEC challenge

A

Can only challenge regs specifically designed to interfere with religion

Religious exemptions not required if law of general applicability

24
Q

Constitutionality of contribution limits

A

Gov cannot limit aggregate amont one person/entity contributes to political candidates or committees during election

Gov can limit amount one person/entity contributes to a single candidate

25
Q

Constitutionality of limits on campaign expenditures

A

Laws can’t limit how much candidate spends on campaign or how much someone spends to get a candidate elected, as long as the expenditures are independent of the candidate (not disguised contributions)

26
Q

Constitutionality of prohibiting judicial candidates from announcing their views on disputed legal and political issues

A

Invalid

27
Q

Constitutionality of prohibiting any campaigning on election day

A

Invalid (involves core political speech = overbroad)

28
Q

Constitutionality of requiring political parties to allow non-party members to vote in the parties’ primary elections

A

Invalid

29
Q

Constitutionality of prohibiting campaign activity w/in 100 feet of polling place on election day

A

Invalid (involves core political speech but is narrowly tailored on election day)

30
Q

Constitutionality of enforcing a party rule requiring voter to be registered w/ a political party to vote in the party’s primary

A

Valid

31
Q

Constitutionality of prohibiting personal solicitation of campaign funds by judicial candidates

A

Valid

32
Q

When is a restraint on a government employee’s speech exempt from strict scrutiny?

A
  1. Speech made on job
  2. In pursuant to official duties (even if speech is matter of pblic concern)
33
Q

What test is used for restraint on government employee’s speech when

  1. the speech is not pursuant to official duties and
  2. does NOT involve mattter of public conern?
A

RBR, can regulate if speech was disruptive of work envoronment

34
Q

What test is used for restraint on government employee’s speech when

  1. the speech is not pursuant to official duties and
  2. does involve mattter of public conern?
A

Court balances employee’s rights as citizen to comment on the matter against gov’s interest as employer in efficient performance of public service