Finite Element Modeling for Development and Optimization of a Bone Plate for Mandibular Fracture in Dogs Flashcards

1
Q

What type of plate was being tested in the study?

A

Osteosynthesis with a pure titanium plate of double-arch geometry and blocked monocortical screws of free angula- tion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was found as the screw numbers diminished?

A

The deflection increased and the relative stiffness decreased proportionally to the diminishing screw number.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What percentage of fractures are mandibular fractures

A

3 to 6 % of all the fractures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what 3 biomechanics factors should be considered when choosing a device for repair?

A

The masticatory muscles, the direction of the fracture line, and the forces involved on the repair of the fracture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

On what surface of the mandibular fracture should a plate be placed?

A

On the tension surface.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What mechanical properties of the nylon block were tested in the tension tests?

A

The elasticity modulus and maximum tension of each block was tested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the six groups that were tested using the plate?

A

group 1 with 3 rostral and 3 distal screws
group 2 with 2 rostral and 3 distal screws
group 3 with 2rostral and 2 distal screws
each with favourable( oblique ventrorostral) and unfavourable fractures(oblique ventrocaudal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

To what tooth was the cantilever force applied to test the plates

A

The mandibular first molar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the standards for the bending test?

A

The point off plastic deformation (irreversible ) for both favourable and unfavourable fractures and the maximum elastic deformation( reversible) of unfavourable fractures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the maximum load applied?

A

40N at a distance of 35mm from the fixation point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Was there a difference in the structural resistance of the different groups in the favourable fractures?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Was there a difference in the structural resistance of the different groups in the unfavourable fractures?

A

Yes statistically significant between G1 & G3 and between G2 & G3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which screw showed the most stress in the plate in the favourable fractures in the G3 group.

A

Generally the ventral screw in the rostral section.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how was the Von Mises stress different for the G3 group ion favourable and unfavourable fractures?

A

Favourable was evenly distributed and in unfavourable was focus on ventral screw in caudal segment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was titanium used I to manufacture the plates in this study?

A

less CT artefact and titanium and titanium aluminium alloy have the lowest elastic modulus of the biocompatible metals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How much higher was the ,maximum force to plastic deformation of the favourable fractures compared to the unfavourable fractures?

A

4 x

17
Q

How does increased stress change bone healing?

A

The concentration of stress is associated with bone resorption while uniform stress distribution is associated with bone regeneration.