Financial 1 - Standard Setting, Income Statement, and Reporting Requirements Flashcards
According to the FASB conceptual framework, which of the following attributes would not be used to measure inventory?
a. Historical cost.
b. Net realizable value.
c. Present value of future cash flows.
d. Replacement cost.
c. Present value of future cash flows.
The present value of future cash flows is used to measure long-term receivables or payables, not inventory, because inventory is a short-term asset, which has more immediate cash flows.
According to the FASB conceptual framework, which of the following statements conforms to the realization concept?
a. Depreciated equipment was sold in exchange for a note receivable.
b. Cash was collected on accounts receivable.
c. Product unit costs were assigned to cost of goods sold when the units were sold.
d. Equipment depreciation was assigned to a production department and then to product unit costs.
a. Depreciated equipment was sold in exchange for a note receivable.
Revenues and gains are realized when assets are exchanged for cash or claims to cash.
According to the FASB conceptual framework, certain assets are reported in financial statements
at the amount of cash or its equivalent that would have to be paid if the same or equivalent assets
were acquired currently. What is the name of the reporting concept?
a. Historical cost.
b. Current market value.
c. Net realizable value.
d. Replacement cost.
d. Replacement cost.
Replacement cost is defined as the amount of cash or its equivalent that would be paid to acquire or replace an asset currently. Replacement cost is an acquisition cost.
Which of the following statements best describes an operating procedure for issuing FASB
Accounting Standards Update?
a. A new Accounting Standards Update can be rescinded by a majority vote of the AICPA
membership.
b. The exposure draft is modified per public opinion before issuing the discussion
memorandum.
c. An Accounting Standards Update is issued only after a majority vote by the members of
the FASB.
d. The emerging issues task force must approve a discussion memorandum before it is
disseminated to the public.
c. An Accounting Standards Update is issued only after a majority vote by the members of the FASB.
An Accounting Standards Update is issued only after a majority vote of the members of the FASB.
Which of the following statements best describes an operating procedure for issuing a new International Financial Reporting Standard?
a. The IASB issues a required discussion paper as its first publication on the new topic.
b. Exposure drafts are only released to selected interested parties.
c. The IASB and IFRIC must jointly approve a new IFRS by majority vote.
d. An exposure draft is issued after approval by at least nine members of the IASB.
d. An exposure draft is issued after approval by at least nine members of the IASB.
Before an exposure draft is issued for public comment, it must be approved by at least nine members of the IASB.
At December 31, Year 2, Off-Line Co. changed its method of accounting for demo costs from writing off the costs over two years to expensing the costs immediately. Off-Line made the change in recognition of an increasing number of demos placed with customers that did not result in sales. Off-Line had deferred demo costs of $500,000 at December 31, Year 1, $300,000 of which were to be written off in Year 2 and the remainder in Year 3. Off-Line’s income tax rate is 30%. In its Year 3 financial statements, what amount should Off-Line report as cumulative effect of change in accounting principle?
a. $200,000
b. $350,000
c. $500,000
d. $0
d. $0
A change in method of accounting for demo costs is a change in accounting principle inseparable from a change in estimate. When a change in accounting principle is considered inseparable from a change in estimate, the change is handled as a change in estimate - prospectively. No cumulative effect adjustment is made.
How should the effect of a change in accounting principle that is inseparable from the effect of a change in accounting estimate be reported?
a. As a correction of an error.
b. By restating the financial statements of all prior periods presented.
c. By footnote disclosure only.
d. As a component of income from continuing operations.
d. As a component of income from continuing operations.
When the effect of a change in accounting principle is inseparable from the effect of a change in accounting estimate, the reporting treatment for the overall effect is as a change in estimate. Thus, the effect is reported prospectively as a component of income from continuing operations.
On April 30, Deer Corp. approved a plan to dispose of a component of its business. For the period January 1 through April 30, the component had revenues of $500,000 and expenses of $800,000. The assets of the component were sold on October 15 at a loss. In its income statement for the year ended December 31, how should Deer report the component’s operations from January 1 to April 30?
a. $300,000 should be reported as part of the loss on disposal of a component and included as part of continuing operations.
b. $300,000 should be reported as a loss from operations of a component and included in loss from discontinued operations.
c. $300,000 should be reported as an extraordinary loss.
d. $500,000 and $800,000 should be included with revenues and expenses, respectively, as part of continuing operations.
b. $300,000 should be reported as a loss from operations of a component and included in loss from discontinued operations.
Once the decision has been made to dispose of a component of a business and that component meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, the operating results of the component for the period reported on, and any gain or loss from the disposal, should be reported separately from continuing operations, net of tax. In this question, the component was classified as held for sale and was sold in the same year.
In open market transactions, Gold Corp. simultaneously sold its long-term investment in Iron Corp. bonds and purchased its own outstanding bonds. The broker remitted the net cash from the two transactions. Gold’s gain on the purchase of its own bonds exceeded its loss on the sale of the Iron bonds. Assume the transaction to purchase its own outstanding bonds is unusual in nature and has occurred infrequently. Under U.S. GAAP, Gold should report the:
a. Effect of its own bond transaction gain in income before extraordinary items, and report the Iron bond transaction as an extraordinary loss.
b. Effect of its own bond transaction as an extraordinary gain, and report the Iron bond transaction loss in income before extraordinary items.
c. Net effect of the two transactions in income before extraordinary items.
d. Net effect of the two transactions as an extraordinary gain.
b. Effect of its own bond transaction as an extraordinary gain, and report the Iron bond transaction loss in income before extraordinary items.
These are two separate transactions because Gold Corp. (1) sold Iron Corp. bonds (an investment) for a loss, and, (2) bought back its own (Gold) Corp. bonds (a debt) for a gain.
This is not a “refinancing” (where one would sell new bond debt to buy back old bond debt outstanding). The gain from the purchase of its own bonds is an “extraordinary gain” because it is both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. The Iron Corp. transaction is a loss in “income before extraordinary items” under U.S. GAAP.
The following question is based on the following:
Vane Co.’s trial balance of income statement accounts for the year ended December 31, Year 1, included the following:
In Vane’s Year 1 multiple-step income statement, what amount should Vane report as income from continuing operations?
a. $129,500
b. $147,000
c. $126,000
d. $140,000
d. $140,000
Per U.S. GAAP, which of the following statements is correct regarding accounting changes that result in financial statements that are, in effect, the statements of a different reporting entity?
a. No restatements or adjustments are required if the changes involve the cost or equity methods of accounting for investments.
b. The financial statements of all prior periods presented should be restated.
c. Cumulative-effect adjustments should be reported as separate items on the income statement in the year of change.
d. No restatements or adjustments are required if the changes involve consolidated methods of accounting for subsidiaries.
b. The financial statements of all prior periods presented should be restated.
Financial statements of all prior periods presented should be restated when there is a “change in entity” such as resulting from:
- Changing companies in consolidated financial statements.
- Consolidated financial statements vs. Previous individual financial statements.
The cumulative effect of a change in accounting estimate should be shown separately:
a. On the income statement after income from continuing operations and before extraordinary items.
b. On the retained earnings statement as an adjustment to the beginning balance.
c. It should not be recorded separately on any financial statement.
d. On the income statement above income from continuing operations.
c. It should not be recorded separately on any financial statement.
A change in estimate is handled prospectively. No cumulative effect adjustment is made and no separate line item presentation is made on any financial statement. If a material change is being made, appropriate footnote disclosure is necessary.
Inventory costs include what?
- Purchase price
- Freight in
Selling expense includes what?
- Freight out
- Salaries and commissions
- Advertising
General & Administrative include what?
- Officer’s salaries
- Accounting & legal
- Insurance
Non operating include what?
- Auxiliary activities
- Interest expense