Finances and attempts at reform (S1.3) Flashcards

1
Q

What was the problem with Crown finances in the early Stuart period?

A
  • Expenditure was rising, due to inflation
  • Crown’s income was falling, as Elizabeth had failed to reform the Crown’s major sources of income.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were the consequences of the Crown’s financial weakness?

A
  • Increasingly difficult for the Crown to govern efficiently
  • Crown had no alternatives in wartime but to devise new means of raising money without parliamentary consent; threatened to become a serious political problem.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the consequences of Elizabeth not updating the Crown’s sources of income?

A

Exacerbated problems that were already concerning due to sustained inflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How much debt had James inherited from Elizabeth?

A

Elizabeth had bequeathed a debt of about £400,000 to her successor. ​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In the First Parliament, how did Parliament respond to James’ request for fiscal help?

A

Only part of the money that he demanded was voted, and the Commons spent much time discussing his domestic and foreign policy (which he believed was past their royal prerogative).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did James’ see as Parliament’s only purpose?

A

Parliament existed principally for the collection of tax revenue.
> He need only summon it when he needs money; Parliament’s duty would then be to vote ‘subsidies’ or ‘supply’ for the King (i.e. vote to collect tax revenue for the King).​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the financial problems in James’ Second Parliament (‘Addled Parliament’) in 1614?

A

James wished to raise a supply of £65,000 while the House of Commons resisted further taxation.
> Parliament saw no reason for a further grant: they saw the King’s continued debt as a result of his extravagance (especially on Scottish favourites such as Robert Car) and saw no justification for continued high spending.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How much in Crown lands had Elizabeth sold to finance war, and why did this cause problems?

A

Elizabeth had sold over £800,000 worth of crown lands
> Ensured that royal income was insufficient to meet the expenses of government.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What had Elizabeth failed to update?

A

Elizabeth had failed to update tax assessments in line with inflation, so James had inherited a tax system that was entirely unfit for purpose.
> It allowed the gentry to assess their own liability to pay tax.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How much did James spend in peacetime, compared to Elizabeth, and when did this peak?

A

Elizabeth had spent less than £300,000 in peacetime
> Under James this rose almost immediately to £400,000 and peaked at £522,000 in 1622.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the four main sources of financial weakness in this period?

A

James’s personality​
Inherited problems​
James’s sources of income​
James’s expenditure​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How much were Scottish favourites and English favourites recieving in an average year?

A

Scottish followers based in the royal court received £40,000 in total, whilst English equivalents received £10,000.​

James considered it perfectly acceptable to pay off their debts using his own revenue before paying off his own debts. This is what happened in 1607 when James paid off the debts of three men at a cost of £44,000. ​

James set aside £25,000p.a. after the birth of Henry for expenditure solely on him.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was an ante-supper?

A
  • Notorious example of court extravagance
    > Preparation of two huge feasts, where the first was for display and to be thrown away
    > One ante-supper in 1621 cost £3,300
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What expenditure did James increase between 1603 and 1610?

A

James decided that the royal wardrobe had to be suitably changed for a man, and increased the expenditure on royal clothing from £10,000 in 1603 to £36,000 in 1610.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What type of sales were a huge success, with it being estimated that between 1603 and 1629, £620,000 was the minimum profit made?

A

The sale of noble titles was a huge success. ​
> It has been estimated that between 1603 and 1629 that the minimum profit earned by the Crown in this way was £620,000.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sale of what was condemned by Parliamentarians, and why?

A

The sale of monopolies was condemned by Parliamentarians because whilst it provided James with income, it created artificially high prices and put up barriers to trade.

17
Q

What was the 1606 Bate’s Case?

A

In 1606 a merchant, John Bate, was taken to court for refusing to pay a duty on currants.​
> Bate claimed the duty had not been sanctioned by Parliament.​
> The judges decided in the King’s favour because the monarch had the right to regulate trade for the security of the realm.​

18
Q

What was released in 1608, in relation to finance, and what was the results and reactions?

A

In 1608 the Book of Rates brought in new duties known as impositions that were levied on 1400 items with no real pretence that it was in the interests of trade. ​
> Impositions immediately brought in an additional £70,000 of revenue a year, but the practice was widely condemned in Parliament.

19
Q

What were the two measures and attempts by Robert Cecil, Lord Treasurer, to reform finance?

A

1608 Book of Bounty
1610 Great Contract

20
Q

What was the 1608 Book of Bounty?

A

This was issued by Cecil in an attempt to prevent James giving away major items such as lands, customs or impositions.​
> But James gave cash away instead. In the last 4 months of 1610 alone he gave away £36,000.​

21
Q

What was the 1610 Great Contract?

A

One-off payment of £600,000 and thereafter an annual grant of £200,000 from Parliament.​
> Crown would surrender its feudal rights of wardship and purveyance
> Would likely have secured James a sufficient income, if it had been combined with a variety of cost-cutting measures.​

22
Q

What was Parliament’s reaction to the 1610 Great Contract?

A
  • A distaste for James’ spendthrift ways and resentment that the political nation was being asked to pay for it. ​
    > A fear that financial independence would allow James to sidestep Parliament and the political nation and impose a continental-style absolutism on the country.​

Rejected it.

23
Q

What was Parliament’s problem with prerogative taxation, and when did they clash with James over this?

A

The King collecting taxation using his royal prerogative meant that Parliament might become unnecessary. ​
> If he collected enough tax revenue using his prerogative, and therefore didn’t need Parliamentary supply for money, Parliament might never be called again!!​
> So James and Parliament clashed in 1610 and 1614 over impositions.​

24
Q

In relation to finance, why did James’ First Parliament (1604-1610) fail?

A

Dominated by Bate’s Case and debt
> Failed over Robert Cecil’s failed Great Contract and impositions

25
Q

In relation to finance, why did James’ Second ‘Addled’ Parliament (1614) fail?

A

Failed over monopolies and impositions​

26
Q

In relation to finance, why did James’ Third Parliament (1621-22) fail?

A

Failed over finance, but largely more over the Spanish Match, religious and foreign policy​

27
Q

What remained an issue in the 1624-1625 Fourth Parliament?

A

Finance (as well as foreign policy and religious policy, in the form of the Thirty Years War)

28
Q

Who was Lionel Cranfield, and what were his aims?

A

Cranfield rose through the ranks to become Lord Treasurer in 1621

Aims were to;
> To amass as much money personally as possible.​
> To reform royal finances.

29
Q

What were Cranfield’s measures​ to reform royal finances?

A

Halt to borrowing and the indiscriminate sale of Crown lands
Savagely cut the payment of gifts and pensions
No grants of lands, pensions or allowances would be made without Treasury approval.

30
Q

Why did Cranfield fall from grace, and what events exacerbated this?

A

Cranfield’s attempts to reform finance were blown when in 1623 Charles and Buckingham went to Madrid which cost £47,000.
> When in 1624 Cranfield opposed war against Spain, Buckingham turned against him.​
> In May 1624 he was found guilty of corruption by the House of Lords, sentenced to lose all his offices, heavily fined and imprisoned at the King’s pleasure. ​

31
Q

What was a monopoly?

A
  • Process where the Crown could sell the exclusive right to provide a product or service
    > Often sold for whatever amount the Crown needed
    > Controversial and in disrepute as a form of the Crown’s exploitation of its prerogative
32
Q

Why was Parliament unwilling to fund James’ subsidies in 1621?

A
  • Voted two subsidies, totalling £140,000
    > Reluctant to give more due to the want to express their grievances; feared he may dissolve Parliament like in 1611
33
Q

Who was impeached in the 1621 Parliament?

A

Lord Chancellor Francis Bacon
> Cranfield and Coke revived the feudal device of impeachment, to remove the minister
> James decided to sacrifice Bacon to appease the Commons, and to prevent an attack on Buckingham

34
Q

What were the two main Acts implemented in the 1624 Parliament?

A

Subsidy Act
Statute of Monopolies

35
Q

What was the 1624 Subsidy Act?

A

Act granted a subsidy of £300,000 to the Crown for warfare

35
Q

What was the 1624 Statute of Monopolies?

A

Act limited the Crown’s right to grant monopolies to individuals

36
Q

What was the financial landscape of Stuart Britain like by the time James had died?

A
  • No systematic reform
  • James’ extravagance had made the financial position weaker than in 1603
  • Crown and Parliament had become caught and distrustful of eachother
  • Finance remained a central parliamentary concern.