Finals Study Flashcards
MM setup returns on trade
R=(S_B+D)/S_A\alpha*x-\alpha(1+r_f)D-\alpha(x-(1+r_f)D)
MM assumptions
no taxes, bankruptcy, t-costs, asymm. info, agency conflict, two period, identical firm
What is ROE for MM
return on unlevered equity + debt / share ratio * risk premium (rho-r_f).
Stiglitz and Miller result
Using account, GE implies that if financing decisions are changed, consumption and prices remain constant. Allows firms to be borrowing and lending at the same rate, no bankruptcy as well.
Implication of Stiglitz and Miller
information asymmetry, commitment, agency has to be the solution for standard preferences
Tradeoff Theory
Debt creates net tax benefit but also default costs.
What is the tax shield benefit (equity, corporate tax, and interest rate tax)
\Delta = (1-(1-t_c)(1-t_e)/(1-t_i))
5 conditions for signaling equilibrium
- IR constraint; 2. IC constraint; 3. PBE RE; 4. Reasonable beliefs OEP; 5. Each type different inference
Ross setup (2 type)
M=(1+r_f)\gamma_0V_0+\gamma_1[v_1-1_{v
Ross 2 type solution
High type issues debt because it’s cheaper. Firm b issues 0 debt, provided cost of default is high enough. Cutoff F^*.
Cont. Type Ross Model Setup
Type determines upper bound on the support of project type.
Cont. Type Ross Model Utility
\gamma_0 a(F)/2+gamma_1(t/2-LF/t) if F
Ross REE definition
a(F(t))=t
Ross REE brute force solution (separating) steps
Steps:
1) Get DE using FOC within default probability region. Use appropriate boundary conditions.
2) Show equilibrium cannot have default for sure. Get corresponding parameters.
3) Never optimal to deviate to debt region (get parameters).
Ross cont. pooling steps
conjecture a debt level (0) and check the IC constraints
Intuitive criterion definition
OTP beliefs are zero for a type that does not benefit from deviation. Benefiting from deviation must be that the types inference is kept constant in the new setting.
What does intuitive criterion rule out?
Pooling disappears. Only the most efficient separating equilibrium remains.
In efficient separating equilibrium, high type deviates epsilon lower and gains from issuing less debt. Since it is still not profitable for the low type to deviate, high type gets inference with probability 1 and remains well off.
What does intuitive criterion rule out?
Pooling disappears. Only the most efficient separating equilibrium remains.
In efficient separating equilibrium, high type deviates epsilon lower and gains from issuing less debt. Since it is still not profitable for the low type to deviate, high type gets inference with probability 1 and remains well off.
It is key that the low type never gains.
Write down the four conditions for Mailath
IC, SIC (equality for IC), SM (U_3/U_2 monotonic in type), IV (outcome when take the choice of the worst type, given everyone knows your outcome, important restriction)