finals Flashcards

1
Q

The understanding of what sounds (or signs) exist in a language, how they can be combined, and what sequences of sounds relate to specific meanings.

A

Linguistic Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The lack of inherent connection between the sound of a word and its meaning. For example, the English word “dog” has no natural relationship to the animal it signifies.

A

Arbitrary Relation of Form and Meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The internalized rules and principles that govern how words are structured, sentences are formed, and meaning is conveyed in a language.

A

Mental Grammar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The study of the sound systems of a language and the rules governing their combinations.

A

Phonology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The study of word formation and structure, including how words are built from smaller units.

A

Morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The set of rules that determine the structure and order of words in sentences.

A

Syntax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The study of meaning in language, examining how words and sentences represent ideas, objects, and relationships.

A

Semantics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The study of how context influences the interpretation of meaning beyond the literal sense of words.

A

Pragmatics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Words that mimic natural sounds, such as “buzz” or “splash,” often considered in discussions about the origins of language.

A

Onomatopoeia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The idea that humans are born with an natural ability to acquire language, supported by the existence of Universal Grammar.

A

Innateness Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The smallest unit of meaning in a language, such as “book” or “books” (composed of “book” + “s” to indicate plural).

A

Morpheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A morpheme that can stand alone as a word, e.g., “run” or “happy.”

A

Free Morpheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A morpheme that cannot stand alone and must be attached to another morpheme, e.g., prefixes like “un-“ or suffixes like “-ing.”

A

Bound Morpheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Morphemes that modify a word’s tense, number, aspect, or gender without changing its core meaning, such as “-s” in “cats.”

A

Inflectional Morphemes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Morphemes that create new words or change the grammatical category of a word, such as “-ness” in “happiness.”

A

Derivational Morphemes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The process of combining two or more words to form a new word, e.g., “toothbrush.”

A

Compounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The process of adding prefixes, suffixes, or infixes to a base word to form new meanings, e.g., “redo.”

A

Affixation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The study of how words combine to form phrases and sentences, governed by specific rules.

A

Syntax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Groups of words that function as a single unit within a sentence, such as a noun phrase or verb phrase.

A

Constituents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The relationships between sentence elements, such as subject, object, and predicate.

A

Grammatical Relations:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

model introduced by Noam Chomsky, describing how sentences are derived from underlying structures through transformations.

A

Transformational Grammar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The property of language that allows for infinite embedding of phrases or clauses, such as “The cat [that chased the mouse [that stole the cheese]] ran away.”

A

Recursion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

A situation where a sentence can be interpreted in more than one way due to its structure, e.g., “Visiting relatives can be annoying.”

A

Syntactic Ambiguity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The study of meaning in language, including word meanings, sentence meanings, and the relationships between them.

A

Semantics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

The literal or primary meaning of a word, as opposed to its connotation.

A

Denotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

The additional, often subjective or cultural, meanings and associations of a word.

A

Connotation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

The roles that participants play in the context of a sentence, such as agent (doer), theme (receiver), and instrument (means).

A

Semantic Roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

A single word having multiple related meanings, e.g., “bank” as a financial institution and the side of a river.

A

Polysemy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Words that have the same spelling or pronunciation but unrelated meanings, e.g., “bat” (animal) and “bat” (used in sports).

A

Homonymy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Words that have similar meanings, e.g., “big” and “large.”

A

Synonymy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Words with opposite meanings, e.g., “hot” and “cold.”

A

Antonymy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

A hierarchical relationship where a word’s meaning is included in another, e.g., “sparrow” > “bird.”

A

Hyponymy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

A subfield overlapping with semantics, focusing on meaning in context and how language is used in interaction.

A

Pragmatics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Variants of a phoneme that occur in different contexts but do not change the meaning, e.g., aspirated [pʰ] in “pat” vs. unaspirated [p] in “spat.”

A

Allophones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Two words that differ by only one phoneme, e.g., “bat” and “cat.”

A

Minimal Pair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

A standardized system for representing the sounds of spoken language.

37
Q

The rhythm, stress, and intonation of speech.

38
Q

The study of how language is used in social contexts, including the effects of context on meaning.

A

Pragmatics

39
Q

Actions performed through speech, such as requesting, apologizing, or commanding. Examples include “Can you pass the salt?” (a request).

A

Speech Acts

40
Q

Information implied by a speaker but not explicitly stated, e.g., “Some of the guests arrived” implies not all guests have arrived.

A

Implicature

41
Q

Words or phrases, like “here,” “now,” or “you,” that require contextual information to convey meaning.

42
Q

Assumptions implied by a statement, e.g., “John’s brother is tall” presupposes that John has a brother.

A

Presupposition

43
Q

The process by which humans acquire the ability to perceive, produce, and understand language.

A

Language Acquisition

44
Q

The theory that there is a biologically determined period during which language acquisition occurs most easily.

A

Critical Period Hypothesis

45
Q

The process by which infants acquire their native language naturally and unconsciously.

A

First Language Acquisition

46
Q

The process of learning a language after the first language has been acquired, often involving formal instruction.

A

Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

47
Q

A common error in language learning where a rule is applied too broadly, e.g., “goed” instead of “went.”

A

Overgeneralization

48
Q

The ability to use two languages fluently.

A

Bilingualism

49
Q

The study of the relationship between language and society, including regional, social, and cultural variations.

A

Sociolinguistics

50
Q

A regional or social variety of a language, distinguished by pronunciation, grammar, or vocabulary.

51
Q

Alternating between two or more languages or dialects within a conversation or sentence.

A

Code-Switching

52
Q

Differences in speech patterns based on regional, social, or ethnic factors.

A

Language Variation

53
Q

The study of the relationship between language and the brain.

A

Neurolinguistics

54
Q

A region in the frontal lobe involved in language production.

A

Broca’s Area

55
Q

A region in the temporal lobe crucial for language comprehension.

A

Wernicke’s Area

56
Q

A disorder resulting from brain damage that affects language abilities.

57
Q

A biologically determined period during which language acquisition is most effective.

A

Critical Period

58
Q

The specialization of the brain’s hemispheres for language functions.

A

Lateralization

59
Q

Symbols that represent objects or concepts directly.

A

Pictograms

60
Q

Symbols representing sounds rather than meanings.

A

Phonograms

61
Q

Origins of Language: Language comes from god and if a child is left alone with no other language interactions it will start speaking it.

A

Divine Source theory

62
Q

Origins of Language: primitive words could have been imitations of environmental sounds which early people heard around them.

A

Natural sound source theory

63
Q

Origins of Language: “Yo-He-Ho” theory is its other name, it says that the first language emerged from humans interacting during physical tasks through grunts and social calls.

A

Social Interaction source theory

64
Q

Origins of Language: humans physically evolved to be able to produce speech as is supported by our very speech inclined physical features compared to other animals.

A

Physical Adaptation source theory

65
Q

Origins of Language: The brain developed the capacity for speech alongside the capacity to manipulate objects as those two parts of the brain are closely related.

A

Tool-making source theory

66
Q

Origins of Language: Humans have always had an innate capacity for speech. There might be a language gene.

A

Genetic source theory

67
Q

Word formation:
Invention of a totally new term from trademarks for commercial products or names of people or places.

68
Q

Word formation:
Taking words from other languages.

69
Q

Word formation:
Putting two words together to create one new word.

A

Compounding

70
Q

Word formation:
Taking only the beginning of a word and mixing it with another word.

A

Blending (ex: gas and alcohol: gasohol)

71
Q

Word formation:
A word of more than one syllable is reduced to a shorter form.

72
Q

Word Formation:
A word of one type (usually noun) is reduced to a word of another type (usually a verb)

A

Backformation (Television> to televise)

73
Q

Word Formation: the function of the word changes but its form stays the same.

A

Conversion (bottle> (to) bottle)

74
Q

Word Formation:
New words formed from the initial letters of a set of other words.

75
Q

Word formation:
Creation of words through affixation

A

Derivation

76
Q

First stage of first language acquisition

77
Q

Second stage of first language acquisition

A

One-word stage

78
Q

Third stage of first language acquisition

A

Two-word stage (want cookie)

79
Q

Fourth stage of first language acquisition, short sentences omitting less critical words. (Mommy go store)

A

Telegraphic speech

80
Q

Fifth stage of first language acquisition, robust vocab and grammatical structure.

A

Full language development

81
Q

Exposure to language in meaningful context

82
Q

Noam Chomsky suggests humans are born with a mental framework for learning any language in the theory of__

A

Universal Grammar

83
Q

A theoretical construct by Chomsky positing an inborn mechanism in the brain for language learning.

A

LAD (Language Acquisition Device)

84
Q

Simplified and exaggerated speech used by caregivers to communicate with infants.

A

Motherese or Child-directed speech

85
Q

Infants’ ability to discriminate between sounds, even those not present in their native language.

A

Phonemic discrimination

86
Q

The ability of children to quickly link a new word with its meaning after minimal exposure.

A

Fast Mapping

87
Q

Using a word too broadly (calling all four-legged animals dogs)

A

Semantic overextension

88
Q

A process by which the child uses words’ meanings to infer their syntactic categories.

A

Semantic bootstrapping