Finals Flashcards

1
Q

Psychology of Personal Constructs

A

George Alexander Kelly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Perhaps the most appropriate term is “metatheory,” or a
theory about theories.

A

Psychology of personal constructs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to Kelly, all people (including those who build
personality theories) anticipate events by the meanings or
interpretations they place on those events.
These meanings or interpretations are called

A

Constructs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ask questions, formulate hypotheses, test them, draw conclusions, and
try to predict future events.

A

Steps in a scientific study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Make observations, construe relationships among events, formulate
theories, generate hypotheses, test those that are plausible, and reach
conclusions from their experiments.

A

In quest for life’s meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Open for reformulation through imagination and foresight.

A

Person as a scientist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Kelly believed that the person, not the facts, holds the key to an individual’s future. Facts and events do not dictate conclusions; rather, they carry meanings for us to discover.

A

Constructive alternativism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

We are all constantly faced with alternatives, which we can explore
if we choose, but in any case, we must assume responsibility for
how we construe our worlds.

A

Constructive alternativism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

It is one’s way of seeing how things (or people) are alike and
yet different from other things (or people).

A

Personal Constructs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

People’s behaviors (thoughts and actions) are directed by the
way they see the future.

A

Basic Postulate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 basic Postulate

A

Person’s processes
Channelized
Ways of anticipating events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Refers to a living, changing, moving human being.

A

Person’s Processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

To suggest that people move with a direction
through a network of pathways or channels.

A

Channelized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

which suggests that people guide
their actions according to their predictions of the future

A

Ways of anticipating events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • Similarities Among Events
  • No two events are exactly alike, yet we construe similar events so
    that they are perceived as being the same.
  • E.g : One sunrise is never identical to another, but our construct dawn
    conveys our recognition of some similarity or some replication of
    events. Although two dawns are never exactly alike, they may be
    similar enough for us to construe them as the same event
A

Construction Corollary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • differences aming people
    -No two people put an experience together in exactly the same
    way.
    ● E.g. Even identical twins living in nearly identical environments do
    not construe events exactly the same. For example, part of Twin
    A’s environment includes Twin B, an experience not shared by Twin
    B.
A

Individuality corollary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q
  • relationships among construct
  • Different people organize similar events in a manner that minimizes
    incompatibilities and inconsistencies.
    ● E.g.An individual construed intelligence and health as good and
    stupidity and illness as bad. Furthermore, someone’s views of
    independence and dependence (like her constructs of good and bad)
    would have had a multitude of subordinate constructs.
A

Organization corollary

18
Q
  • dichotomy of constructs
  • states that people must be able to see
    similarities between events, but they must also contrast those events
    with their opposite pole.
    ● E.g. How are intelligence and independence alike? Their common
    element has no meaning without contrasting it to an opposite.
    Intelligence and independence have no overlapping element. By contrasting intelligence with stupidity and independence with dependence, you see how they are alike and how they can be
    organized under the construct “good” as opposed to “bad.”
A

Dichotomy corollary

19
Q
  • choice between dichotomized
  • people make choices on the basis of how they
    anticipate events, and those choices are between dichotomous
    alternatives.
    ● E.g.Purchasing a new car was too expensive compared to the
    relatively inexpensive used car. Each choice is between
    alternatives in a dichotomized construct, and with each choice.
A

Choice corollary

20
Q
  • Range of convenience
  • assumes that personal constructs are finite and not relevant to everything
  • E.g.Independence carries with it the notion of dependence.An
    individual’s freedom to remain in school, freedom to continue her job,
    and freedom to move quickly from place to place without relying on
    others all fall within her independence/dependence range of
    convenience. However, Arlene’s construct of independence excludes all irrelevancies such as up/down, light/dark, or wet/dry; that is, it is
    convenient only for a finite range of events.
A

Range corollary

21
Q
  • experience and learning
  • restructuring of events which allows us
    to learn from our experiences.
    ● Experience consists of the successive construing of events. The
    events themselves do not constitute experience—it is the meaning
    we attach to them that changes our lives.
A

Experience corollary

22
Q
  • adaptation to experience
  • assumes that the extent to which
    people revise their constructs is related to the degree of permeability of their existing constructs.
    ● A construct is permeable if new elements can be added to it. Thus,
    all people modulate or adjust their personal constructs.
A

Modulation corollary

23
Q
  • Incompatible Constructs
  • allows for the incompatibility of specific elements
  • E.g. A man might be protective of his wife, yet encourage her to be
    more independent. Protection and independence may be
    incompatible with each other on one level, but on a larger level, both
    are subsumed under the construct of love. Thus, the man’s actions
    to protect his wife and to encourage her to be more independent
    are consistent with a larger, superordinate construct.
A

Fragmentation corollary

24
Q
  • similarities among people
  • E.g. Two people might arrive at similar political views although they
    come from disparate backgrounds.
A

Commonality corollary

25
Q
  • social process
  • assumes that people do not communicate with
    one another simply on the basis of common experiences or even
    similar constructions; they communicate because they construe
    the constructions of one another.
    ● People are actively involved in interpersonal relations and realize
    that they are part of the other person’s construction system
A

Social corollary

26
Q

Five- factor trait theory

A

Robert R. McCrae
Paul T. Costa Jr.

27
Q

focus of study of many personality psychologists, but historically different psychologists had their own particular list of personality traits they focused on and there was little consensus as to
what the major dimensions of personality were.

A

Traits

28
Q

It used factor analysis techniques to examine the stability and structure of
personality. Costa & McCrae focused initially on

A

Neuroticism and
Extraversion

29
Q

After they discovered N and E, they discovered a third factor, which they
called

A

Openness to Experience.

30
Q

High Scores

HIGH SCORES
affectionate
joiner
talkative
fun loving
active
sober
passionate

LOW SCORES
reserve
Loner
quiet
passive
unfeeling

A

Extraversion

31
Q

HIGH SCORES
anxious
temperamental
self-pitying
self-conscious
emotional
vulnerable

LOW SCORES
calm
even-tempered
self-satisfied
comfortable
unemotional
hardy

A

Neuroticism

32
Q

HIGH SCORES

imaginative
creative
original prefers variety curious
liberal

LOW SCORES

down-to-earth
uncreative
conventional
prefers routine
uncurious
Conservative

A

Openness

33
Q

HIGH SCORES

softhearted
trusting
generous
acquiescent
lenient
good-natured

LOW SCORES
Ruthless
suspicious
stingy
antagonistic
critical irritable

A

Agreeableness

34
Q

HIGH SCORES
conscientious
hardworking
well-organized
punctual
Ambitious
Persevering

LOW SCORES
negligent
lazy
disorganized
late
aimless
quitting

A

Conscientiousness

35
Q

Units of five factor theory

A
  1. Core components
  2. Characteristic adaptations
36
Q

Generally inferred than observed. It may be inherited, imprinted by early experience, or modified by disease or
psychological intervention which defines the individual’s potential and direction.

A

Core components

37
Q

five stable personality traits,

A

Extraversion
Agreeableness
Openness
Neuroticism
Conscientiousness

38
Q

-Acquired personality structures that develop as people
adapt to their environment.
-It can be influenced by external influences such as acquired
skills, habits, attitudes, and relationships that result from the
interaction of individuals with their environment.

A

Characteristic adaptations

39
Q

The beliefs, attitudes, and feelings one has toward oneself are
characteristic adaptations in that they influence how one
behaves in a given circumstance.

A

Self- concept

40
Q

-Biological bases (genes, hormones, brain structures)
-Objective biography (events and experiences one has had over
the lifetime)
-External influences (how we respond to opportunities and
demands of the context)

A

Peripheral Components

41
Q

f (characteristic adaptations) + (external
influences) = ???

A

Behavior