Final Test!!! Flashcards

1
Q

Bradley’s definition of attention

A

Salient event
External or internal
Processed vs. ignored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

James’ definition of attention

A
Voluntary component
Limitations
External or internal 
Focus
Selection vs. withdrawal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does attention imply?

A

Vision is not a passive process, it is active
Selection of information to process further
Inhibition of other information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Selective or focused attention

A

Ability to focus on a task/type of information while ignoring others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Divided attention

A

Ability to manage several tasks at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sustained attention

A

Ability to perform a task for a long period of time (significant drop after 30 min)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Selective Attention

Three Elements

A

Orienting to sensory events
Detecting signals for focussed processing
Maintaining a vigilant or alert state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cocktail party effect

A

Selective auditory attention, ability to focus on a single conversation in a noisy environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dichotic listening paradigm: shadowing procedure

A

No memory for the content of the ignored ear (even if repetitions or reversed message)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Early selection theory

A

Physical features of sensory information are registered, inputs analysed according to these features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Late selection theory

A

Physical features and meaning of inputs are processed before selection takes place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attenuation theory

A

Relevant information can pass through the filter
Some highly important words (first name, ‘ fire! ’) or very likely words in a given context (ex. ‘drum’ after ‘instrument’) have a lower detection threshold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Spotlight metaphor

A
Attention highlights an area; which is processed more efficiently - Selection
Attention moves – Displacement
cost of invalid trials
the spotlight can’t be split in 2
its size is fixed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zoom metaphor

A

Attention can cover an area varying in size
For large areas: gross information (low spatial resolution)
For narrow areas: detailed information (high spatial resolution)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Endogenous

A

-> top down cue
e.g. directional arrow which can be ignored
Shift of attention is voluntary and slow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exogenous

A

-> bottom up cue
e.g. flashing box which cannot be ignored
Shift of attention is automatic and fast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Object-based attention

A

your attention has spread within the object following the cue
People have spread their attention over the whole display
Better performance if answer concerns one object rather than two

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Head-up displays

A

Help detecting the runway, but not unexpected events! Actually worse!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Change blindness

A
Flicker paradigm
Mudsplashes
Blink (Rensink et al., 1998)
Gradual changes
→ Disruption or gradual aspect suppress bottom-up / exogenous signal
20
Q

Failures of attention: Top-Down Modulation

A
Change the height of barrier vs. change height of fence. Better at detecting changes that are relevant
Inattentional blindness (IB)
21
Q

Sources of limitations

A

Peripheral vision: But failures exist in central vision too!
Quantity of information: Bottleneck analogy (Pashler & Johnston, 1998)
Dual-task interference: Same or different modality

22
Q

Parallel or disjunctive search

A

We can see the whole field and the target pops out at us
Pre-attentive, bottom-up, exogenous
Not affected by the number of distractors
Orientation, colour, movement, size, depth

23
Q

Serial or conjunctive search.

A

If the target isn’t present you will respond after inspecting all, if present you will find after inspecting half.
Focal attention, top-down, endogenous
Affected by the number of distractors
Slower RTs if the target is absent (x 2)

24
Q

Parallel vs. Serial processing

A

Parallel processing: Distributed over the whole visual field, Automatic, the zoom is large
Serial processing: Focused, Attention moves sequentially from area to area, Cf. spotlight metaphor, Smaller zoom because we need to extract details, move spotlight around the display

25
Q

Search Asymmetry

A

Parallel search then serial search. Search asymmetry is the presence or absence of a feature in the search

26
Q

Feature integration theory

A

Features extracted pre-attentively
Different modules for different features (colour, orientation etc.)
Feature maps within each module
Unique feature -> unique activity in a separate map
Conjunctive search: Combines activity in different maps, focal attention, detects presence of features faster than their absence

27
Q

Guided search theory

A

Items analysed by features

Salience map from bottom-up + top-down factors, Search guided by salience – Some items have more weight

28
Q

Visual search in practice

A

People are a bit slower when they must look for something new. Training is quite difficult to get benefits.
Scanning strategy does not improve with practice (target not fixated more often)
Target recognition improves (stimulus specific)
Training should focus on perceptual organisation and object recognition

29
Q

Visual neglect from damages

A

Unilateral visual neglect
Inability to process information in half of visual field
If there is competition for information then one side will be neglected

30
Q

Three-stage model of attention

A

Disengagement (parietal cortex): Very slow RTs for trials with invalid cue in the ipsi-lesional field and target in the contra-lesional field
Movement/Shift (superior colliculus): Slow RTs to cued targets in the contra-lesional area
Engagement (pulvinar in the thalamus): Slow RTs for targets in the contra-lesional area (valid & invalid trials)

31
Q

Blindsight

A

Idea of allowing judgements but not awareness
Other evolutionary ancient pathway, Before the optic nerve gets to the LGN it branches off to the superior colliculus, connects mostly to parietal, somewhat temporal

32
Q

Backwards Masking

A

Stimulus then mask over time, time between Inter-stimulus interval (ISI)
Masking Effectiveness Depends on:
- Timing (ISI)
- Stimulus intensity/contrast
- Stimulus content (e.g., emotional)
- Individual differences and criteria (later) - liminal, point of being able to see it

33
Q

Metacontrast Masking

A

The mask does not appear in the same place as the stimulus
ISI determines effectiveness of metacontrast masking
Intermediate ISI -> works alright
Works really well at short or long ISI’s
Difference in subjective awareness

34
Q

Binocular Rivalry

A

The image is stable and unchaining and yet something in our brain is choosing what to become aware of at any time

35
Q

Saccades are influenced by a variety of cognitive processes

A
Attention
Working memory
Long term memory
Learning
Decision making
36
Q

Fixation and object manipulation

A

Fixations precede object manipulation (~ 560 ms)
Move on to the next object ~ 610 ms before manipulation completed
A third of fixations on objects have one of four monitoring functions:
Locating objects for later use
Directing (hand or object) to a new location
Guiding the approach of an object to another
Checking the state (e.g. water level)

37
Q

Muscle positions in eyes

A

Primary position: eye is central in the socket
Secondary position: single horizontal or vertical rotation
Tertiary position: all other oblique directions
Muscles move the eyes but also keep them still!
Eye will move faster in a simple up/down motion or sideways

38
Q

3 components of a shift of (covert) attention

A

Disengagement (parietal cortex)
Shift/Movement (superior colliculus)
Engagement (pulvinar in the thalamus)

39
Q

Define Saccard

A

rotation of the eyes to bring a target into fovea
The 2 eyes turn in the same direction
30 - 40 ms
Up to 3 or 4 per seconds (> 150,000 a day)
A few degrees in size, larger during active tasks (18-20°) – See Land et al. (real world task)
Fast, stereotyped movements

40
Q

Visual grouping

A
Figure ground segregation
Law of proximity
Law of similarity
Law of good continuity
Law of closure
41
Q

Depth Cues

A
Aerial – atmospheric perspective: decrease of contrast as a function of distance
Relative size
Light and shadow
Colour -> far away is bluer
Texture Gradients
Interposition (or occlusion)
Linear Perspective
42
Q

Depth cues in prehistory

A

Relative size, some perspective

43
Q

Egyptian art

A

Elevation, occlusion, people’s size may depend on social status

44
Q

Greek art

A

Some linear perspective

45
Q

Renaissance

A

Linear perspective

46
Q

Brightness constancy challenge

A

Perceived brightness is identical regardless of the lighting, We use the context to estimate the reflectance of the object in terms of brightness