FINAL TERM : CRIMES COMMITTED BY PUBLIC OFFICERS Flashcards
Elements of other frauds ART 214
- The offender is a public officer
- He takes advantage of his official position
- He commits any of the fraud or deceits enumerated in Art 315-318
Prohibited Transactions
- The offender is an appointive public officer
- He becomes interested, directly or indirectly in any transaction of exchange or stipulation
- Transaction takes place within the territory subject to his jurisidction
- He becomes interested in the transaction during his incumbency
Possession of prohibited interest by a public officer
- Public officer who, directly ot indirectly, became intersted in any contract or business in which it was his official duty to intervene.
- Experts, arbitrators, and private accountants who, in like manner, took part in any contract or transaction connected with the estate or property in the appraisal, distribution or adjudication of which they had acted
- Guardians and executors with respect to the property belonging to their wards or the estate.
MALVERSATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS AND PROPERTY
- Offender is a public officer or employee
- He has the custody or control of funds or property by reason of his duties of his office
- Those funds or property were public funds or property for which he is accountable
- He appropriated, took, misappropriated or consented or through abandonment or negligence, permitted another person to take them.
Who is the offender
An accountable public officer refers to any person who is a public officer who is entrusted by law to collect public funds and property and to account it later to the state. He is an accountable public officer
Two ways of committing malversation
- Positive act
- Passive act
Positive act is through deliberate intent or through dolo. He is the one who appropriates or misappropriates, who took the said public fund or property
Passive act which is through is abandonmenet or negligence. He allowed other to appropriate or misappropriate the said public funds or property
ARTICLE 218 – FAILURE OF ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER TO RENDER ACCOUNTS
- Offender is a public officer, whether in the service or separated therefrom
- He must be an accountable officer for public funds or property;
- He is required by law or regulation to render accounts to the Commission on Audit, or to a provincial Auditor;
- He fails to do so for a period of two months after such accounts should be rendered.
ARTICLE 219 – FAILURE OF RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC OFFICER TO RENDER ACCOUNTS BEFORE LEAVING THE COUNTRY
- Offender is a public officer;
- He must be an accountable officer for public funds or property;
- He must have unlawfully left (or be on the point of leaving) the Philippines without securing from the Commission on Audit a certificate showing that his accounts have been finally settled.
ARTICLE 220 – ILLEGAL USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY (Technical Malversation)
- Offender s a public officer;
- There is a public fund or property under his
administration; - Such public fund or property has been appropriated by law or ordinance; and
- He applies the same to a public use other than that for which such fund or property has been appropriated by law or ordinance.
MALVERSATION VS. TECHNICAL MALVERSATION
MALVERSATION
1. The offender public officer is entrusted with public funds and property for his custody.
2. The public funds and property must be
accounted later by the public officer to the State.
3. The public officer took, appropriated or
misappropriated the said public funds and property.
4. Malum in se
TECHNICAL MALVERSATION
1. The offender public officer is entrusted with public funds and property for his administration.
2. The public funds and property must be applied to that particular purpose for which it has been appropriated by law or ordinance.
3. The public officer applied it to another public use other than to that which it has been appropriated by law or ordinance.
4. Malum prohibitum
ARTICLE 221 – FAILURE TO MAKE DELIVERY OF
PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY
- That the public officer has government funds in his possession;
- That he is under obligation to make payments from such funds;
- That he fails to make payment maliciously.
ARTICLE 221 – FAILURE TO MAKE DELIVERY OF
PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY (PUNISHABLE ACTS)
- Failing to make payment by a public officer who is under obligation to make such payment from Government funds in his possession;
- Refusing to make delivery by a public officer who has been ordered by competent authority to deliver any property in his custody or under his administration
ARTICLE 222 – OFFICERS INCLUDED IN PRECEDING PROVISIONS
Private Individual who may be liable under Art. 217- 221:
- Private Individual who in any capacity whatsoever, have charge of national, provincial or municipal funds, revenue or property;
- Administrator, depository of funds or property attached, seized or deposited by public authority even if such property belongs to a private individual;
- Those who acted in conspiracy in malversation;
- Accomplice and accessories to malversation.
ARTICLE 223 – CONNIVING WITH OR CONSENTING TO EVASION
- Offender is a public officer;
- He has in his custody or charge a prisoner, either detention prisoner or prisoner by final judgment;
- Such prisoner escaped from his custody;
- That he was in connivance with the prisoner in the latter’s escape, or is with his consent;
ARTICLE 224 – EVATION THROUGH NEGLIGENCE
- Offender is a public officer;
- He is charged with the conveyance or custody of a prisoner, either detention prisoner or prisoner by final judgment;
- Such prisoner escapes through his negligence.
ARTICLE 225 – ESCAPE OF PRISONER UNDER THE CUSTODY OF A PERSON NOT A PUBLIC OFFICER
- Offender is a private individual;
- Conveyance (or charge) of custody of prisoner or person under arrest is confided to him;
- Prisoner or person under arrest escapes;
- Offender consents to the escape of the prisoner or person under arrest or that the escape takes place through his negligence.
ARTICLE 226 – REMOVAL, CONEALMENT OR
DESTRUCTION OF DOCUMENT
- Offender is a public officer;
- He removes, destroys, or conceals documents or papers;
- Said documents or papers should have been
entrusted to such public officer by reason of his
office; - Damage, whether serious or not, to a third party or to the public interest should have been caused.
ARTICLE 227 – OFFICER BREAKING SEAL
- Offender is a public officer ;
- He is charged with the custody of papers or
property; - These papers or property are sealed by proper
authority; and - He breaks the seals or permits them to be broken.
ARTICLE 228 – OPENING A CLOSED DOCUMENT
- Offender is a public officer ;
- Any closed papers, documents, or objects are
entrusted to his custody; - He opens or permits to be opened said closed
papers, documents or objects; and - He does not have proper authority
ARTICLE 229 – REVELATION OF SECRETS BY AN
OFFICER (PUNISHABLE ACTS)
I. By revealing any secrets which affect public interest learned by him in his official capacity.
II. Wrongfully delivering papers or copies of papers of which he may have charge, and which should not be published thereby causing damage, whether serious or not, to a third party or to public interest.
ARTICLE 229 – REVELATION OF SECRETS BY AN
OFFICER ( 1ST PUNISHABLE ACT)
- Offender is a public officer;
- He knows of a secret by reason of his official
capacity; - He reveals such secret without authority or
justifiable reasons; and - Damage, great or small, is cause to the public
interest. It is necessary that there be damage caused, whether serious or not.
ARTICLE 229 – REVELATION OF SECRETS BY AN
OFFICER ( 2ND PUNISHABLE ACT)
- Offender is a public officer;
- He has charge of papers;
- Those papers should not be published;
- He delivers those papers or copies thereof to a
third person; - The delivery is wrongful; and
- Damage is caused to public interest
ARTICLE 230 – PUBLIC OFFICER REVEALING SECRETS OF PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL
- Offender is a public officer;
- He knows of the secrets of private individual by reason of his office; and
- He reveals such secrets without authority or
justifiable reason.
ARTICLE 231 – OPEN DISOBEDIENCE
- Offender is a judicial or executive officer;
- There is judgment, decision, or order of a superior authority;
- Such judgment, decision or order was made within the scope of the jurisdiction of the superior authority and issued with all the legal formalities; and
- Offender without any legal justification openly
refuses to execute the said judgment, decision or
order which he is duty bound to obey.