Final Review Flashcards
(138 cards)
How did Fogel define the concept of social savings?
Definition: The difference between what it would cost to ship goods in a world with railroads and what it would cost to ship the same goods on the same routes without using railroads. Importance: Fogel used the social savings concept to determine how the absence of railroads would have restricted the development of the American economy.
How does Fogel calculate the social savings?
If we had all the information we wanted, we could measure social savings as the change in consumer surplus, as shown in class. This is approximately equal to: Social Savings = (MCwater – MCrailroad) * Qrailroad If P=MC, then we cal also calculate social savings as (Pwater – Prailroad) * Qrailroad However, if P does not equal marginal cost (for example, under oligopoly), this method of estimating social savings may lead to incorrect results. Fogel argues that his alpha figure exaggerates the real social savings of intraregional trade because many of the farms in 1890 were in production only because of the availability of low-cost rail service. Basically, without cheap rail transportation the cost of shipping crops from some farms to markets by alternative means would have exceeded the total market value of the crop.
How does the concept of counterfactual play into Fogel’s analysis of intra-regional trade?
The counterfactual, as we discussed on the first full day of class, has as its ultimate goal to understand how the world would have been but for something happening. In this analysis, we’re trying to figure out: What would the United States (and, particularly, U.S. economic growth) have been like in the absence of railroads? Fogel constructed a “Beta estimate” to reflect that world without railroads would have been different in ways besides just shipping costs. Fogel makes a few assumptions for this analysis. He assumes that in this counterfactual world: 1. More canals could have been build in the absence of railroads. He maps exactly where these canals would be. With railroads, they would not have been economically viable. 2. The additional canals would have allowed more land to be suitable for agricultural, but some land would have still been too far from markets for non-subsistence farming. 3. Without railroads, roads would likely been of higher quality, lowering the cost of wagon transport. With these assumptions (and many more for how to value things), Fogel comes up with a social savings of $175 million. However, this is only for four crops. With a bit more guessing, Fogel come up with a bottom line: The social savings could have been no more than $560 million, or 4.7% of GNP.
How did slavery and indentured servitude differ?
They’re similar in the sense that you purchase both. Treatment differed? People Indentured Servants Indentured Servants were People who were transported to America free of charge in exchange for selling their labor for a set period of time [note: in class, Prof. Miller said this was the primary difference] to someone in America. “Indentured Servitude was a credit system financing intercontinental transportation, providing a link between the English labor supply and colonial demand to the colonies…through this mechanism the servant borrowed against the future returns to his his/her labor. The indenture was a promise to repay a loan, for which the servant was the security (p. 40).” Slavery On the other hand, slavery was a system in which involuntary participants [and their children] would be held for life by the person who had paid for their passage.
Say you were a 1755 Virginia tobacco farmer. Would you purchase an in. servant or a slave, and why?
I would choose an indentured servant because the high price of shipping makes transporting slaves more costly while simultaneously increasing the amount of people who would need to use indentured servitude as a economic mechanism to finance the cost of transportation to the American colonies thereby lowering the price of labor (ie the wage rate) for indentured servants (p. 47-48).
Say you were a 1855 Georgia cotton planter. Would you purchase an in. servant or a slave, and why?
I would purchase a slave because there has been a decline in the costs of ocean shipping as ocean shipping productivity has increased thereby lowering the price of price of slave labor [increasing the amount of slaves supplied] while simultaneously raising the price of indentured servants’ labor [the lower shipping costs allow more potential indentured servants to pay for their own way to the United States, shifting their labor supply curve to left because quantity supplied at each wage level has decreased] (p. 48- 49) In the graph below, a decrease in transportation costs has shifted the supply of slaves down. However, the share of indentured servants has decreased – more people can now afford to move to US without it.
What was the primary form of economic activity in the South in 1745?
Agriculture (employed 85 percent of the colonial labor force) [commercial; tobacco, rice, indigo, or cotton]
What was the primary form of economic activity in the South in 1840?
South: Plantation Agriculture (“King” Cotton, tobacco was no longer commercially successful - intensive cultivation of the “noxious weede” [tobacco] had led to soil depletion and demand for tobacco had begun to wane in the 1790s, rice, sugar)
What was the primary form of economic activity in the South in 1880?
South: (p. 386- 389)continued to grow cotton (decreased demand [demand curve shift] and increase in prices), rice, sharp drop in per capita income after the civil war, the number of plantations increased while the average size decreased. Sharecropping emerged as the dominant work arrangement between white plantation owners and freedmen.
What was the primary form of economic activity in the North in 1745?
New England: Shipping [employed between 5 and 10 percent of the entire colonial labor force; large supply of timber], the primary form of agriculture was purely for subsistence purposes
What was the primary form of economic activity in the North in 1840?
New England: Industrialization began in New England. (By 1840, when absolute agricultural employment in Massachusetts was at its peak, the share of labor in agriculture was only 40 percent) Cotton textile industry takes hold in this region because New England towns offer adequate waterpower for spiining mills given the amount of rivers and streams.
What was the primary form of economic activity in the North in 1880?
New England: (p. 403) Farms increased by about 20% [compared with the Midwest where the amount of farms triple after the Civil War and the far West where the amount of farm s increased sevenfold.] (p. 458) In 1860, most American industry \was widely dispersed, rural, small-scale, and simple. Most of the nation’s manufacturing was concentrated around New York and Philadelphia
What was the primary form of economic activity in the West in 1745?
West: Agriculture [employed 85 percent of the colonial labor force]
What was the primary form of economic activity in the West in 1840?
West: Agriculture [foodstuffs like grain, wheat], beavers, sea otters, bison for fur
What was the primary form of economic activity in the West in 1880?
West: The Midwest had developed a substantial industrial sectors [especially Chicago - 80,000 workers in manufacturing]. Processing industries less than a third of the urban industrial population of the Midwest. Industries such as furniture, clothing, machinery, printing and publishing supplied local and regional markets, employed almost sixty percent of the midwest’s urban population.
What were the 6 characteristics of early American Industrialization?
1.(sans vowesl): PITCHFACE Decline in Household production 2. Decline in the number of the craftsmen after 1815 3. Rise of factories, what is a factory 4. Rise of corporations 5. Protectionism 6. Rise of textile Industry
What was sharecropping?
Positive Incentives of Sharecropping: both parties have a clear stake in maximizing output and thereby rapidly adjusting to changes in weather or price expectations (there are no barriers to adjusting work schedules). They weren’t lifetime arrangements, they were renegotiated annually (good for sharecropper [higher wages], good for owner [find a new tenant if his sharecropper was falling behind expected output, highz competition among tenants that might force sharecroppers to work hard as renters] Adverse Incentives: No incentive for the tenant to expend effort preventing soil erosion or contribute to capital investment [repairing fences, improving breeding stock, etc…]
What was GDP per capita in the antebellum era?
overall it increased. From $350 in 1710 to $2650 in 1880 (in 1989 $).
What was life expectancy in the antebellum era?
up and down. Additionally, some technological improvements at first hurt life expectancy: initially running water made people sicker, as it diffused what used to be a localized problem with bad wells.
What was population growth in the antebellum era?
huge – 55 births per 1000 women.
What was birth rate in the antebellum era?
Nearly as high as humanly possible.
What was death rate in the antebellum era?
Lower than in Europe (more space). More death in the South.
What was the quality/quantity of goods consumed in the antebellum era?
Standard of living went up; availability of cheap textiles. 1. 1830s = Introduction of the stove, coffee grinder. 1850s = Canning, sewing machine In 1750, you would be sleeping on straw with one blanket; by 1850 you would have a feather beds with sheets. Meat Consumption was very high in America. a. Americans ate on average at 180 lbs/ yr.
What was average height in the antebellum era?
The S was generally taller than the N. Within the same region of the country, heights of workers different significantly across occupations. Farmers and white-collar workers are taller than common laborers (the shortest), all else being equal. Soldiers enlisting in the Civil War got significantly shorter as the war went on. “Antebellum Puzzle”: Why was per capita GDP rising and heights falling? People were leaving agriculture toward manufacturing.