Final Remaining Flashcards
Utilization behavior
exaggerated tendency for one’s behavior to be determined by the external environment
behavior automatically determined by salient stimuli in environment
damage to IFG (Inferior Frontal Gyrus)
Imitation Behavior
Copying environmental stimuli
Utilization behavior
Environmental Dependency Syndrome
Behaviors determined by environment as opposed to willful action
Damage to IFG (Inferior Frontal Gyrus)
Damage to Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG)
Inferior Frontal Gyrus
damage to IFG demonstrate utilization behavior
will spontaneously mimic actions
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Brenda Milner identified dPFC role in cognitive control through Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST)
perseverative error: error of inhibition
patient “can’t stop himself”
could verbalize proper response but couldn’t could not modify skeletomotor responses accordingly
recruit epilepsy patients pre/post unilateral cortical incision
perseverative error: error of inhibition
patient “can’t stop himself”
could verbalize proper response but couldn’t could not modify skeletomotor responses accordingly
Pavlovian Threat Conditioning
Classical conditioning
US, CS + NS pairing, CS alone elicits CR,
Amygdala plays role in learning fear response
Le Doux
Threat processing circuit
Lateral Nucleus = association formation
Central Nucleus = downstream response
plasticity in lateral nucleus is what allows it to encode and store the associations between the CS and US
Amygdala = structure = consists of several nuclei
The sensory information from the CS (all stimuli) goes to thalamus —> sent to lateral nucleus (labeled input nucleus of amygdala bc takes in all stimuli CS + US) —plasticity in lateral nucleus is what allows it to encode and store the associations between the CS and US; in this nucleus the association is being formed; if you lesion the LN only you will prevent fear conditioning —> associations then get transferred to central nucleus “referred to as output nucleus” bc takes info from LN and sends downstream to parts of brain responsible for fear response; you’re not preventing the association from being formed, you’re preventing the information from going downstream
Extinction
Originally thought to involve “unlearning” of the CS-US association; but evidence suggests original pathway remains intact; extinction learning–CS is actually associated with something neutral; active form of learning
EXTINCTION LEARNING IS AN IMPLICIT FORM OF EMOTION REGULATION
Current understanding of extinction posits that it involves new learning of a CS-No US association
COMPETES WITH PREVIOUSLY LEARNED CS-US ASSOCIATION
Reinstatement
Exposure to US -> Reinstatement
Reemergence of CR –> Original association between CS and US must remain intact following extinction
Renewal
Presentation of CS in new context -> Renewal
Reemergence of CR –> Original association between CS and US must remain intact following extinction
Spontaneous Recovery
Passage of time -> Spontaneous Recovery
Reemergence of CR –> Original association between CS and US must remain intact following extinction
Prelimbic Cortex
PL
in rats
crucial in fear expression
homologous to dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC)
Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex
dACC
in humans
crucial for fear expression
homologous to prelimbic cortex in rats
Infralimbic
IL
in rats
crucial in extinction
homologous to ventralmedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)
Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex
vmPFC
in humans
crucial for extinction
Homologous structures in rodents and humans in fear conditioning and extinction
prelimbic cortex (rats) = dACC dorsal anterior cingulate c ==> promote fear expression, oppose extinction
infralimbic cortex (rats) = vmPFC ventromedial prefrontal c ==> inhibit fear expression, promote extinction
Quirk rodent experiment
lesioned IL in rodents (homologous to vmPFC in humans)
does not interfere with extinction on day 1
interferes with retrieval
on same day, you don’t see huge change; prominent differences show up on day 2; it’s as if they never learned extinction, only retained threat learning
Implications for extinction process
Functions as a memory…contains three steps
- acquisition
- consolidation
- retrieval
***retrieval of extinction memory impaired on day 2
Process Model of Emotional Regulation
Outline of the process of experiencing emotion according to appraisal theories
start with a situation that could elicit emotion if you attend to the aspects of the environment —> once you attend to something, it depends on the meaning/appraisal so place on something, that determines your emotion generation
What enables us to change the meaning that emotional stimuli have to us?
- situation selection
- situation modification
- attentional deployment
- cognitive change
Cognitive Reappraisal
down-regulating negative emotion
meta-analysis task –> bc volitional action, lateral regions more involved
Circadian Timing
- Operates over the 24 h light-dark cycle
- Drives metabolic and behavioral rhythms
- sleep
- wakefulness
- appetite
- metabolic and reproductive fitness
Millisecond Timing
Subsecond range
used for speech, music, motor control
Interval Timing
Seconds-to-minutes range
used for anticipating future events, organizing behavior, decision making
Verbal Time Estimation Task
(Participants verbally estimate duration of the square on screen)
Temporal Reproduction Task
Reproduce the duration themselves
Participants are required to press the spacebar once to initiate their time estimates and then press once again when they think that the presentation duration of the former square (e.g., 3 s) has elapsed
Duration Discrimination Task
2+ stimuli presented
subject may be asked to make a judgment as to whether the longer interval was the first or second