Final Push of Class Flashcards
What are the 3 basic premises of Symbolic Interactionism?
- People act according to objects in their lives and the meanings those objects have for them.
- These meaning emerge from interactions among people.
- Meanings are applied and occassionally modified.
-> Came from Chicago School -> environment causes criminality.
What is Howard Beckers view on deviance?
deviance is not a quality of the act a person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an “offender”
It is only when those in power apply a label to that behaviour that it becomes criminal.
Example:
- “…the act of injecting heroin into a vein is not inherently deviant.”
- If a nurse gives the patient drugs under a doctor’s orders, it is perfectly proper. It is when it is done in a way that is not publicly defined as proper that it becomes deviant.”
- eg a police car in a police chase, speeding after a car speeding trying to get away is not deviant, but the car trying to get away is deviant.
What is Cooley’s “Looking Glass Self?”
- Cooley originated the idea of the Looking Glass Self
- Central to his concept of identity
- Consists of three elements
- How actors imagine who they appear to others
→ we are constantly monitoring our context/place for clues and cues - How actors believe others judge their appearance
- How actors develop feelings of shame or pride based on these perceptions
- These feelings then guide conduct.
Three Components
- These feelings then guide conduct.
- How actors imagine who they appear to others
- We imagine how we appear to others in social
- We imagine and react to what we feel
- We develop a sense of self through the perceived judgment of others.
- We understand ourselves by considering what others think and drawing conclusions from those thoughts.
What is Social Reaction Theory: Labelling?
- Edwin Lemert - Social Pathology
- Why do some people develop a criminal career?
- Primary Deviation
- Everyone commits deviant acts
- eg stuff where you wake up and you’re like I can’t believe I did that
- Prompts no change in master status.
- Everyone commits deviant acts
- Labelling theorists are not concerned with the criminal act, but with the application of a label to that act.
Those kids who get labelled as troublemakers (by authority figures) then take on that identity → people label them as not good at school, a troublemaker, so they start to see themselves that way.
People who are labelled as bad kids are labelled as such, and when they are caught doing something “bad” it confirms that label. - Secondary Deviation
- Patterned deviance
- Development of a deviant identity
- because its being reflected back to them: eg. when Bob can’t hang out with Jimmy and Jimmy asks why, Bob says, “my parents say you’re a troublemaker”
- Integrated into concept of self
- Realignment of self concept
- then has an impact on who you associate with
- Association with deviant groups
What was Lemert’s Errant Student?
- A child plays a prank in class and is admonished by their teacher
- Later the child accidently causes another disturbance and is admonished once again.
- Because the individual has caused repeated disturbances, the teacher begins to refer to them as “trouble maker”
- The child becomes resentful of the label and may act out in consequence – fulfilling the role others expect
- Especially if there is a certain status among a group of peers that play that role
- This group of peers form their subculture where deviant b/h is not only encouraged, but expected
What is the impact of groups on Secondary Deviation?
- Individuals who become part of a deviant group as a result of labelling:
- Makes being deviant easier
- Find like situated individuals
- Acquire rationalizations
If we know the impacts of labels, what are the criminal justice policy implications?
- Interactionism centres on what happens to criminals once their deviant activities commence.
- Some groups or individuals have power to force the deviant label on the less powerful
- The deviance is not a quality of an act, but a label.
- Primary deviance → initial act of rule breaking that isn’t responded to
- Secondary deviance → what happens once a person is labelled and how they act after receiving this label → you come to see yourself as that label.
- We could emphasize rehabilitation → within the CJS
- We could redefine what it means to be a criminal.
- Becker and others: we ought to define deviance up.
- Eg. shoplifting is sth that is really minor on the continuum of criminality
- when it comes to these minor forms of crime and criminality we should not respond to them by criminal label.
- we do not want thee ppl who are first time, not serious offenders to be criminalized and have that effect their whole lives.
What are the criminal justice implications of social reaction theory – especially among young people?
- Defining Deviance Up: Diversion
- argues CJS does the opposite of what it is intended to do → causes crime → by putting first time offenders in the CJS for minor crime and criminality → it will have an impact on that individual’s identity and where they go in their lives
- diversion diverts the criminal out of the criminal justice system
- eg. person gets charged by the police, then given conditional discharge → eg. if they do 20 hrs community service, write a letter of apology, they will not get a criminal record → will avoid the CJS
- aka Post Charge Diversion
- critics argue this still has an impact on people’s lives → people know when someone is arrested.
- pre-charge diversion → give them a warning instead of arresting them → eg. make them write a letter of apology and 10 hrs of community service
- If you don’t do it the charge is reinstated and you go through the CJS
Strain Theories relates crime to what?
variables such as cultural goals and the access to opportunities provided by society.
What is the central concept in interactionist theories of crime?
the deviant career, or the passage of an individual through the stages of one or more related deviant identities.
- This idea is at the heart of labelling theory, which explains how the social response to initial, tentative acts of deviance can move a person (not always willingly) towards a deviant identity and a deviant career.
What is Labelling Theory?
according to labelling theory, deviance is a quality not of the act but of the label that others attach to it. This raises the question of who applies the label and who is labelled. The application of a label and the response of others to the label may result in a person becoming committed to a deviant identity.
- But some deviants escape public detection of their behaviour. Some who have not deviated are nonetheless labelled as having done so, despite their protests to the contrary.
What does a career mean in terms of deviance?
a career, be it in deviance or in a legitimate occupation, is the passage of an individual through recognized stages in one or more related identities.
What did Sampson and Laub find about crime?
- found that crime declined with age sooner or later for all the offender groups they studied.
- Within that pattern, however, Short (1990) noted that careers in youth crime are likely to be prolonged after certain turning points have been reached.
- One of these turning points is an early interest in delinquent activities; another is an interest in drugs.
- The inability to find legitimate employment, a career contingency, also contributes to continued criminality.
- Type of offence has been found unrelated to length of career in youth crime.
What two important concepts did Lemert contribute to the study of deviant careers?
primary deviation and secondary deviation.
What is Lemert’s “Primary Deviation?”
- occurs when an individual commits deviant acts but fails to adopt a primary self-identity as a deviant.
- produces little change in one’s everyday routine or lifestyle.
- the individual engages in deviance infrequently, has few compunctions about it, and encounters few practical problems when performing it.
- eg. a person who out of curiosity occasionally takes an opiod drug supplied by sb else exemplifies primary deviation.
Few young people have strong value comittment to deviant norms and identities; instead they drift (a psychological state of weak normative attachment to either deviant or conventional ways) between the world of respectability and that of deviance.
- During the primary deviation stages of a deviant career, young offenders and young adults drift, in part bc they lack the value commitment to either conventional or deviant values.
What is Lemert’s “Secondary Deviation”?
occurs when an individual accepts the label of deviant. The result is adoption of deviant self-identity that confirms and stabilizes the deviant lifestyle.
- Much human behaviour is situationally oriented and geared to meeting the many and shifting claims which others .
What are Moral Rhetorics?
in the study of crime, this is the set of claims and assertions deviants make to justify their deviant behaviour. The moral rhetoric of a group is an important component of socialization into a deviant identity.
- Each rhetoric consists of a set of largely taken-for-granted guiding principles, sometimes logically inconsistent and always electively applied according to the social situations in which youths find themselves.
What is Stigma?
- As used by Erving Goffman (1922-82), a personal characteristic that is negatively evaluated by others and thus distorts and discredits the public identity of the individual. For example, a prison record may become a stigmatized attribute. The stigma may lead to the adoption of a self-identity that incorporates the negative social evaluation.
- a black mark, or disgrace, associated with a deviant identity.
- it is a collective construction by agents of social control, and by ordinary members of the community, of the supposed nature of the unlawful act and the person perpetrating it.
- Goffinman (1986) and Phelan (2001): the collective image of stigma is constructed from social, physical, or psychological attributes the deviant is believed to possess.
Who are Agents of Social Control?
- Those members of society who help check deviant behaviour are known as agents of social control.
- Includes the police, judges, lawmakers, prison personnel, probation and parole officers, and ordinary citizens with an active interest in maintaining law and order as they define it.
Who are ‘Moral Entrepreneurs”?
Someone who defines new rules and laws or who advocates stricter enforcement of existing laws. Often such entrepreneurs have a financial or organizational interest in particular definitions or applications of law.
- Rule creator and rule enforcer.
- prototype of the rule creator, according to Becker, is the crusading reformer, whose dissatisfaction with existing rules is acute and therefore campaigns for legal change and sometimes for attitudinal change intended to lead to “proper” behaviour.
- moral entrepreneurs also enforce legislated rules, applying them to people who misbehave.
- Application of the label of deviance is sometimes biased.
When does Deviance become Secondary?
- Deviation becomes secondary when deviants see that their behaviour has substantially modified their ways of living.
- Accusations of deviance are typically the most influential factor behind the redefinition of one’s deviant activities.
- By labelled by the authorities as a murderer, rapist, prostitute, or cheque forger and being sanctioned for such behaviour forces the deviant to change his or her lifestyle drastically.
- so can feelings of guilt but accusations or deviance are typically most influential.
Lemert (1072): “this secondary deviant… is a person whose life and identity are organized around the facts of deviance.”
What is Master Status and what is its role in Secondary Deviance?
Among the factors leading to secondary deviation is society’s tendency to treat someone’s criminality as a master status (Becker) - a status overriding all others in perceived importance. Whatever other personal or social qualities individuals possess, they are judged primarily by this one attribute. Criminal exemplifies a master status that influences the communities identification of an individual.
- Lack of success in attaining respectability among nondeviants, or a perceived low probability of achieving it, may lead to interaction with other deviants.
- Becker: individuals who gain entrance to a deviant group often learn from that group how to cope with the problems associated with their deviance.
- makes being a deviant easier.
- Furthermore, the deviant acquires rationalizations for his or her values, attitudes, and behaviours, which come to full bloom in the organized group.
- The amount of interaction between individuals suspected of deviant behaviour and agents of social control, and the forms these interactions take, are extremely important for the future course of a deviant career.
- In fact, such interactions constitute a major set of deviant career contingencies.
What is a “Career Contingencies”
- an unintended event, process or situation that occurs by chance, beyond the control of the person pursing the career.
- Career contingencies emanate from changes in the deviant’s environment or personal circumstances, or both.
- Cohen (1965): Alter (the agents of social control) responds to the action of ego (the deviant).
- Ego, in turn, responds to alter’s reaction. Alter then responds to his perception of ego’s reaction of him; and so forth.
What is “continuance commitment?”
Another prominent contingency in secondary deviation is continuance commitment.
- aka adherence to a criminal or other identity arising from the unattractiveness or unavailability of alternate lifestyles.
- Continuance commitment helps explain a person’s involvement in a deviant identity.
- continuance commitment explains the identity by describing the penalties accrued from renouncing the deviant identity and trying to adopt a conventional identity.
- Eg. Stebbins study of male, nonprofessional property offenders in Newfoundland revealed a number of commitment-related penalties of both types.
- Being ex-offenders with prison records, the men in the study had difficulty finding jobs within their range of personally acceptable alternatives. The work they found was onerous, low in pay, and low in prestige.
- Many men had amassed sizable debts before going to prison, which upon release tended to discourage return to a conventional livelihood.
- The man with a criminal record was often inclined to seek the company of those who understood him best—other criminals—and to seek the way of life that afforded him at least some money and excitement—crime.
When does Continuance Commitment develop?
- Once a prison record has been acquired, after several years of secondary deviation, continuance commitment develops.
- Most deviants in this stage of their moral careers appear to be trapped in a self-degrading form of continuance commitment.
- Some criminals, including professional offenders, are quite attached to their deviant activities: bc they find leaving crime for a conventional way of life no easier than it is for the nonprofessional offender, they are also comitted to deviance.
- Theirs, however is self-enhancing comittment.
- For these professional criminals, continuance commitment is of little consequence; they enjoy what they do and are disinclined to abandon it
- Theirs, however is self-enhancing comittment.
What is the Self-Enhancing Reaction to Commitment?
Comittment leading to a better opinion of oneself.
What is the Self-Degrading Reaction to Commitment?
- Commitment leading to a poorer opinion of oneself.
- an individual committed to an identity in this manner has numerous alternatives.
- ppl motivated by self-degrading commitment have the objective alternative of redefining the values and penalties associated with their committed identity, such that they become attached to them.
- which laters their perception of the balance of penalties.
- Without really switching to a form of self-enhancing commitment, it is possible for some deviants to adjust psychologically to a self-degrading commitment.
- Depends on how strong a motivating force the current state of self-degrading commitment actually is for them.
- Certain types of mildly rejected deviants seems to manage this form of adaptation.
- Lemert refers to them as “adjusted pathological deviants” . → successful adjustment apparently depends in part on the availability of a role for them to play in the community.
- Lemert: “self-defeating and self-perpetuating deviance” → alcoholism, drug addiction, and systematic cheque forgery as examples of this sort of vicious cycle of cause and effect, characterized by an almost complete absence of durable pleasure for those involved.
- Finally, if the desire to escape self-degrading commitment is exceptionally strong, and if none of the alternatives mentioned so far appeals to the commited individual, suicide becomes a prominent alternative.
What does Matza say about deviant careers?
- delinquents generally end their deviant careers at maturation, with few continuing on to adult crime.
- Wolfgang, Thornbery and Figlio found that many adult criminals mature out of their antisocial way.
- Even deviants who are attached to their way of life often experience disillusionment and shifts of interest, which is what maturation means in everyday terms in the world of crime.
What two areas of interactionist theory can be seen as contributions to the study of socialization into crime?
the processes of differential association and acquisition of a criminal identity.
What is Criminal Identity?
this social category, imposed by a community correctly or incorrectly defines an individual as a particular type of criminal. The identity pervasively shapes his or her social interactions with others. Similar to master status.
What is Differential Association?
developed by Edwin Sutherland in 1930s this theory argues that crime, like any social behaviour, is learned in association with others. If individuals regularly associate with criminals in relative isolation from law-abiding citizens, they are more likely to engage in crime. They learn relevant skills for committing crime and ideas for justifying and normalizing it
What are the 9 propositions describing the complicated patterns of interaction that Sutherland called Differential Association?
- People learn how to engage in crime.
- This learning comes about through interaction with others who have already learned criminal ways.
- The learning occurs in small, face-to-face groups.
- What is learned is criminal technique, motives, attitudes and rationalizations.
- Among criminals, one important learned attitude is disregard for the community’s legal code.
- One acquires this attitude by differentially associating with those who hold it and failing to associate with those who do not.
- Differential associations with criminals and noncriminals vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity.
- Learning criminal behaviour through differential associations rests on the same principles as learning any other kind of behaviour.
- Criminal behaviour is a response to the same cultural needs and values as noncriminal behaviour.
- consequently, tying societal needs and values to crime fails to explain it.
- Also, differential association is often a major antecedent in the use of addictive drugs and dependence on alcohol. It may even play an explanatory role in some mental disorders.
- However, many other factors, which dilute the importance of differential association, must be considered when explaining such behaviour.
- consequently, tying societal needs and values to crime fails to explain it.
According to Birkbeck and LaFree another set of factors for deviance?
- Symbolic interactionism, they note, further aids our understanding of crime by directing attention to the motives and meanings operating in the situations in which crimes are committed.
- Eg. Katz found that the expressive reasons behind many criminal acts (eg. thrill, enjoyment) are as important as the instrumental reasons (eg. money, status).
What is the major contribution of differential association?
- The major contribution of differential association is that it has highlighted the importance during the criminal career of ties to deviant peers.
- There is a lot of research evidence showing that having young offenders as friends is one of the strongest correlates of deviant behaviour.
- among at-risk youth, gang membership contributes to delinquency above and beyond the influence of associating with deviant peers
What are the two sides of the process of identification of an individual as deviant?
- Based on a variety of criteria (eg. appearance, actions, associates, location), members of the community come to view someone as a particular kind of criminal.
- Community identification of people tends to be highly persuasive, even for deviants.
- That is, with officials, neighbours, relatives, and others asserting these people are outlaws, it becomes increasingly difficult for them to deny the charge.
- Acquiring a community reputation, or identity, for unsavoury behaviour often furthers individual criminality.
- Especially likely when the reputed criminal is forced into association with others of similar status and away from those who are “respectable”.
How can Labelling Theory by summarized?
- Lemert, Becker
- Primary deviance is infrequent deviance that involves little change in routine or lifestyle. Secondary deviance occurs when deviance becomes a way of life and a part of the deviant’s self-image.
How can Differential Association be summarized?
- Sutherland
- Crime and delinquency are primarily learned in interaction with others in small, face-to-face groups. This involves learning techniques of deviance and justifications for it.
What are the two interactionist theories?
- Labelling theory by Lemert and Becker
- Differential Association by Sutherland
what is Ethno-Methodological theory?
Ethno-methodology theory was pioneered by Harold Garfinkel. The term means the study of people’s practices or methods. This perspective does not see the social world as an objective reality, but as something people constantly build and rebuild through their thoughts and actions. Ethno-methodologists try to uncover the methods and practices people use to create their taken-for-granted world.
What is the Ethno-Methodology view on deviance?
- deviance and the deviant are not independent of the ways people socially construct the meaning of the situations in which they find themselves in daily life.
- The work of these ppl has led to an understanding of how deviant labels and categories are created and applied through three key processes: interpretation, typification, and negotiation.
- Thus, the qualities and attributes of particular individuals become lost or distorted as they are located by other people (eg. bystanders, agents of social control) in the context of a certain category of deviance.
- Their behaviour and identity come to represent that category of deviance, and that category in turn becomes an explanation for the behaviour or identity in question.
- Study how agents of social control and ordinary citizens make sense of deviants and deviant acts.
- The important data for ethno-methodolgists are the clues ppl use to identify kinds of deviants and deviant acts.
Biggest Implications of Interactionist Theory?
- Most profound implication of interactionist theory is that it offers a unique perspective on deviance, one that enhances understanding of this phenomenon.
- Interactionist theory stresses the damaging effects of the deviant label.
- The effects are if at least 2 types:
- the label makes re-entry into the community problematic.
- labels colour the judgements many people make of those who are labelled.
- labels are stereotyped images.
- Both the images and the labels help nondeviants, including practitioners, define situations involving deviants.
- The effects are if at least 2 types:
- Interactionist theory calls attention to the deviant career as a process that helps explain deviance beyond its initial causes.
- One antidote to initial or continued deviance is to give people every possible opportunity to build strong side bets in “respectable pursuits.”
- Juveniles and adult ex-offenders should be encouraged to drift towards conventional interests.
What is interactionist theory’s implications for juvenile offenders?
continuance commitment to deviance among juveniles should be eschewed by avoiding the official label of criminal.
What is the goal of Integrated Offender Management?
- Reduce criminal activity in Edmonton by influencing behaviour change, away from crime, in prolific and persistent offenders
- Positive relationship building with offenders
- Integration with community stakeholders to provide
- Focused intervention with arrests, charges, and prosecution
What are Prolific Offenders?
→ like one bender → a lot of damage at one time → eg breaking all the car windows on Whyte
What are Persistent Offenders?
→ throughout their life
What does the Operation OM look like?
- Carrot and Stick model
- Connecting offender/clients to community agencies, pro-social support, and address their unmet needs
- Case management
- Accountability for the offender
- Surveillance
- eg. for sex offenders → to see what is happening and to stop it before it happens
- eg. traditional surveillance → police officers in unmarked cars following people or by foot
- Non-traditional: google, social media, drones
- drones need authorization to survielle someone
- Warnings
- Criminal Charges
- Show Cause / Sentencing packages
- Surveillance
Who is Selected by OM?
- Offenders identified and selected by Identification and Selection Unit
- UCR Scores
- each criminal offence that is committed has its own number attached to it → its severity weight
- eg. break and enter as a 7
- Aggregate Harm score is comprised of recency, severity, and frequency in their offending, as well as their placement amongst a social network group.
- Higher the score, the more likely they are to be matched/caught
- Based on recent, relevant history, offenders that ISU selects are at a high risk to reoffend.
How does OM work?
- Relationship/Rapport Building
- Behaviour Influence Stairway Model (Vecchi, Van Hasselt and Romano, 2005)
- Effective Behaviour Change Strategy
- PITSE Model (IOMI, 2017)
- Risk Need Responsivity (Andrews and Bonta, 2010)
- Active listening → seeking to understand where that person is coming from instead of trying to change them or seeking to respond
What is the Behavioural Influence Stairway Model?
- Starts with active listening skills → with genuine empathy → rapport → influence → behavioural change
- Once that empathy is demonstrated, that is when rapport starts happening (where they feel kind of safe or understood by you) → you start telling them you will do your best to help them, get them out of that life → where influence starts happening → stop them from engaging in those prosocial behaviours.
- Eg. someone paying for sth little after stealing things forever
- Active listening -> showing genuine empathy -> support
What are active listening skills used in OM?
- Open Ended Questions
- Mirror / Reflect
- Paraphrase
- Summarize
- Questions to Ask- What happened?
- How did you get here?
- When did it go sideways?
- What do you need?
- (use “Why” very sparingly)
- M - minimal encouragers
- O - open-ended questions
- R - reflecting/mirroring
- E - emotional labelling
- P - paraphrasing
- I - “I” statement
- E - effective pauses
- S - summary
What is Risk Need Responsitivity (Andrews, Bonta, and Hoge, 1990)
- Risk
- Level of service must be proportionate to Level of Risk to reoffend
- refers to risk to reoffend
- have to tailor what we’re doing to match that intensity to reoffend
- if increased risk that ppl will reoffend, we need to increase our connection to them
- if we intervene with people who are doing well, it can increase their risk of doing crime
- Need
- Service providers target and address crimogenic needs to reduce an offender’s risk to reoffend. (Basic vs. Criminogenic)
- want to address the needs that are out there that make you commit crime and basic needs as well
- Service providers target and address crimogenic needs to reduce an offender’s risk to reoffend. (Basic vs. Criminogenic)
- Responsivity
- We must provide our services in a way that:
- Meets the offender where they are
- Are tailored to address offender-specific conditions
- need to give you the stuff you need in the way you can take it
- eg. many of the ppl she met were functionally illiterate → could get them to sign things but they were not actually able to comprehend the documents in front of them
- eg. ask them how they are with reading and writing and then go over the document together with them
- We must provide our services in a way that:
What is the Offender Management Continuum (PITSE)?
- Used to help shape and offender’s motivation for change
→ Continuum: - Pro-social
- Prevention
- Intervention
- Targeting (ISU)
- Anti social
- Suppression
- Enforcement
- An offender/client runs the span of this continuum all the time - sometimes all areas can be visited in one day. The longer an individual stays in one area of the continuum, the more committed they are to their behaviour in that area.
- An offender that hits all areas of the continuum in a short amount of time is often in a spiral of self-destructive behaviour, indicative of high risk to reoffend.
- Some offenders and offender/clients will never move from the suppression and enforcement points.
- Some offender/clients will change their behaviour toward the Prevention end of the spectrum with involvement from IOM Detectives.
- The intervention and Suppression phases are the most common in IOM.
- Only time enact surveillance is when there is reason to believe someone is starting to slide downhill → and tell them → “if you’re not doing anything bad, then we’ll stop watching you, but if you are doing bad things, we’ll get you”
- eg. Devon → sexual assaulted by family members → went to live on the streets when he was 12 → had street creed due to his car stealing and selling ring → led to him being shot, stabbed, etc → crime free now
According to the Risk Need Responsivity model, what do we do in terms of different risks to reoffend?
- Is it decreasing?
- Direct them toward social or natural supports
- Reduce level of police involvement
- Is it increasing?
- Increase intensity of police involvement
- Begin suppression (warning)
- Enact enforcement
- Return to jail = time out
What does Risk look like in terms of OM?
- Offender begins to show signs in deterioration of prosocial behaviour.
- Loss of stability (housing, income)
- FTA social agency appointments, probation appointments
- Lying to professional or anyone in authority
- Loss of employment / education opportunities
- Subject/suspect/AC in call for service
- Substance use
- will start using durgs
- Conflict with domestic partner, family members
- bc they feel hopeless
→ Eg. sex offenders being released who are likely to reoffend → when sb is at the end of their sentence, it doesn’t matter if they are rehabilitation or not → they are released.
- the correctional services of Canada will risk assess him but he still is coming out → the best they can do is warn people → bc once you’re done your sentence, you’re done.
Risk looks like what?
- Hostile, defensive toward offender manager
- Risk-taking, reckless behaviour that harms them or others
- new criminal charges (substantive or administrative)
- “Chilling” - couch surfing + drugs + video games
- Minimizing criminal behaviour
- Problematic gambling
- Physical and verbal conflicts
The opposite of addiction is what?
Connection, not sobriety.
-> find them interests, connections to move towards pro-social behaviour.
What are the Central 8 Criminogenic Areas? (Andrews and Bonta, 2010)
- Big Four
- History of antisocial behaviour
- Antisocial Behaviour Pattern
- Antisocial Cognition
- Antisocial Associates
- Moderate 4:
- Family/marital circumstance
- School / work
- Leisure / Recreation
- Substance Abuse
What does Responsivity refer to?
- Basic Repsonsivity
- Meet them where they’re at
- In institution
- In community
- Meet them where they’re at
- Specific Responsivity
- Culture
- Language
- Crime type
- Gender
- Literacy
- just bc sb is functionally literate but illiterate does not mean they don’t have the capacity
- Capacity
- Poverty
How do we know IOM/Risk Need Responsivity Model is working?
- Capture and Measure Behaviour change
- LS/CMI
- 9 Behaviour Indicators
Results in IOM?
- Decrease in antisocial associates
- Huge increase in documented discussion surrounding housing
Key Takeaways of IOM?
- IOM sweet spot in case management = 10 months
- Enforcement is a key proponent of desistance and PandP offender’s crime
- Navigation services in concert with enforcement reduces harm more significantly than enforcement alone
- Transportation is a key responsivity factor
- need to be able to get to your appointments
What does Critical Criminology do?
- Inspired by promises of “freedom” and “justice”, critical criminology draws attention to hidden and overlooked injustices scattered throughout our world.
- Critical criminology:
- attempts to highlight inequalities, discrimination, and suffering and to relate these to the discipline of criminology.
- attends to the processes through which the social world restricts human freedom and choice.
- Hogeveen and Woolford (2206) maintain that critique should not fall into the trap of conceiving of programs that work well within the existing criminals justice system; instead, critical criminologists should extend critique and thought beyond these limits.
- Critical criminologists, then, practice a transformative brand of critique that confronts inequalities and social suffering with promises of more just outcomes.
In recent years what have critical criminologists called for?
- In recent years, drawing on the insights of philosophers such as Michel Foucault, Pierre Bordieu, Jacques Derrida, and Giorgio Agamben (among others), critical criminologists have called for an approach that goes beyond judgement.
- Instead of employing one or another yardstick by which to judge the success or failure of criminal justice policies, these scholars employ an art of critique that involves destabilizing seemingly well-anchored relations in an effort to form new patterns of being that do not pander to established social logics or rely on reactive judgments (Hogeveen and Woolford 2006)
- A nonjudgmental critical criminology would not render judgements about existing policies, programs, institutions, or societal structures.
- Rather, it would suggest “other” (just) ways of being in the world. “It would summon them, drag them from their sleep. Perhaps it would invert them sometimes—all the better” (Foucault, 1997).
- Critical criminological critique attempts to move beyond complicity in government intrusions into the lives of the least powerful.
- It DOES NOT seek ways to better manage the poor and dangerous classes.
- It promises justice to those who are marginalized and discriminated against.
- → Justice through emancipation.
When was Critical Criminology brought about in English Canada?
- Was invigorated in 1973 with the publication of The New Criminology by British criminologists Ian Taylor, Paul Walton, and Jock Young.
- They recommended a “fully social” criminology that:
1. understands crime within its wider socio-cultural context.
2. … examines the structural and political-economic dimensions that produce criminal behaviour.
3. … probes the relationship between crime and the prevailing mode of production (Crime occurs within societies defined by specific systems of economic production. )
4. …questions the role of power and conflict in shaping crime and criminal justice. (criminologists must no simply accept state-defined crime as a given)
5…engages in a materialist analysis of the development of law in capitalist societies. (see notes: gambling in private club is illegal but not in gov’t-run casino)
6. …takes a dialectical approach to analyzing how individuals both influence and are influenced by dominant social structures.
What is difficult about Critical Criminology?
- The growing eclecticism of critical criminology has produced a group of scholars who are difficult to unify under a single label.
- Initially, a key rift developed between two groups defined as “left realists” and “left idealists” (Young 1979).
- Left idealists were said to begin their inquiry into crime from abstract premises (eg. Marxist theory) rather than empirical work. → for this they were criticized by realists for minimizing the harm that crime causes to the working class and for romanticizing criminals as a potentially revolutionary force.
- In contrast, left realists worked through local surveys of crime and victimization to try to move beyond partial criminological understandings, which typically focused only on one aspect of crime: the offender, the state, the public, or the victim.
- Their objective was to take the fear of crime among the working classes seriously and to answer and oppose the work of “right realists,” who under the Thatcher, Reagan, and Mulroney governments had spread the popularity of punitive sanctions and administrative approaches.