Final Need To Know Flashcards

1
Q

Younger Abstention doctrine

A

Federal courts must abstain from interfering with pending state criminal prosecutions except under extraordinary circumstances. Showing of a great and immediate threat of irreparable injury due to an unconstitutional statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Buford Abstention Doctrine

A

Appropriate only where there are difficult questions of state law bearing on policy problems whose importance transcends the result in the case. designed to address the case where federal review of the issues in a case would be disruptive of state efforts to establish a coherent policy with respect to a matter of substance state concern.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ways to avoid sovereign Immunity

A
  1. State officials consent to unit in federal court or waive immunity
  2. P may sue a state official in their own official capacity and requests injunctive relief to stop ongoing violations of law.
  3. Congress may void state immunity from suit pursuant to a power that allows such.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Eleventh amendment

A

The judicial Power of the United States shall not be construed to extend any sue in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against on of the United States by citizens of state or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under color of Law

A

Misuse of power passed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law, is action taken “under color of” state law.
- Applies to any official misdeed no matter whether it deprives a person of their rights under federal or state law.
1. Actions authorized by law
2. As well as unlawful actions committed by individuals who are vested with state authority and acting under apparent authority of the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

42 U.S.C. 1983

A

A cause of action statute for federal wrongdoings;
* federal law allows individuals to sue state officials for violating their constitutional rights while acting under color of state law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Federal Common Law

A
  • Spontaneous generation, as the case of gov. Contracts or interstate controversies.
  • Implications of a private federal cause of action from a statute providing other sanctions
  • Construiing a jurisdictional grant as a command o fashion federal laws.
  • The normal judicial filing of statutory interstices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rules of Decisions Act

A

Where a federal statute directly conflicts with a procedural state statute,the federal procedural rule will govern.
State law should be applied if it is outcome determinative in light of the twin aims of erie:
1. Discourage forum shopping
2. Avoid inequitable administration of laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pendent v. ancillary

A

Pendent: Claims asserted by plaintiffs only in federal question cases which do not have an independent basis for federal jurisdiction

Ancillary: Claims asserted after the filing of the original complaint that do not meet the requirements for jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of counterclaims

A

Compulsory : Arises from same transaction or occurrence.

Permissive: Some Common issue of law/fact but typically doesn’t arise from the same transaction or occurrence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Requirements for supplemental Jurisdiction

A
  1. determine whether the claim qualifies for supplemental jurisdiction.
  2. Determine whether the claim is disqualified fr supplemental jurisdiction when the court’s original jurisdiction is based on diversity.
  3. Determine whether court at its own discretion should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fraudulent Joinder

A

There is no possibility that the state court plaintiff can state a cause of action against the non diverse D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Venue for Removal

A

Venue fr removal is proper in the federal district embracing the state court where the action was filed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule 23(a)

A

4 Requirements to form a class action:
1. Numerosity
2. Commonality
3. Typicality
4. Adequacy of Representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Class Actions

A

A class action begins as a single or multi plaintiff case brought by the class representatives. before the case can proceed as a class action the court use approve or certify the case for class treatment.
An aggregate of more than $5,000,000 in controversy, exclusive of interests and costs. Minimal diversity only.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cause of action Rule

A

a suit arises under the law that creates the cause of action.

17
Q

Federal Question Jurisdiction

A

The district courts of the UnitedStates shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States.

18
Q

Factors to determine Suspension Clause

A
  1. The citizenship and status of the detainee and the adequacy of the process through which the status determination was made.
  2. The nature of the sites where apprehension and then detention took place.
  3. The practical obstacles inherent in resolving the pprisoner’s etitlement to the writ.
19
Q

Suspension clause

A

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless in cases of rebellion or where the public safety necessitates.

20
Q

Ordain and Establish Cause

A

Art. III Section 1 provides for Congress to ordain and establish such inferior courts it deems necessary. Congress’s power to create includes the power to destroy.

21
Q

Prudential Standing

A

Must show that one is absolutely within the zone of interest of a relevant statute. Plaintiff must still have suffered an injury.

22
Q

Constitutional Standing

A

Cannot be Overriden by congress

  1. Injury in fact : An invasion of a legally protected interest which is (1) concrete and particularized the injury must actually exist and must affect the plaintiff in a personal and individual way. (2) actual or imminent .
  2. traceability : Whether the plaintiff’s injury arises from the defendant’s action.
  3. Redressability : Whether the relief requested is likely to improve the plaintiff’s situation
23
Q

Case Or Controversy

A

Art. III oof the Constitution gives federal courts the power to only decide actual cases or controversies. This depends on standing, ripeness, Mootness, or advisory opinions.

24
Q

Pullman Abstention doctrine

A

If there’s an unsettles state law and hasn’t been fully adjudicated in state courts, federal courts have the authority to not decide on the matter. 3 elements must be present for this doctrine:
(1) both federal and state law claims involved
(20 state law courts have not decidedly ruled on issue ( unsettled or unambiguous)
(3) if the state law claim is resolved, it would potentially resolve the matter. 9 Important state Function )

25
Outcome determinative test
A federal court determines whether a state law must be followed if the outcome would be identical utilizing federal rules.
26
anti Injunction statute
Federal court may not grant an injunction to stay the state court proceedings except may be: - expressly authorized by Congress - in aid of its jurisdiction - Re-litigation issue.
27
Gibbs Test
Supplemental jurisdiction the court may decline to exercise even if it arises in every decision . Claims asserted by P ONLY in federal question cases which doesn’t have an independent basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction .
28
Ex parte Young
Federal Courts typically cannot enjoin state criminal proceedings. However if federal action is started prior to state proceedings the federal court holds jurisidiction in both civil and criminal matters. Federal Courts may not interfere in a case where state criminal proceedings are commenced prior to the federal actions.
29
Colorado Abstention doctrine
Applies where Parallel litigation is being carried out, particularly where federal and state court proceedings are simutaneously being carried out to determine rights of the parties with respect to the same questions.
30
Rule 24
Intervention is permitted as a matter of right and when permission from the court is needed.
31
Rule 19
Parties must be joined of feasible and providing courts guidance on whether to allow a case to go forward when a necessary party cannot be joined.
32
Permissive Joinder
When parties may but are not required to join additional parties where the claims arise out of the same series i=or transactions or occurrence and involve CNOF
33
Impleader
Claims asserted by P against person made parties under Rule 14.
34
Qualified Immunity
Government Officials are shielded by civil liability if they are performing discretionary functions that do not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person should have known.
35
Absolute Immunity
Gov’t Officials performing special functions or constitutional status afforded complete protection from suits. - judges, police officers while in court testifying, prosecutors when performing a variety oof function in court but not outside, legislators when communicating with other legislature butt not during press release.
36
Well Pleaded Complaint Rule
In order for federal court to have jurisdiction to hear a case, the suit must arise under the Constitution and laws of the U.S. and must be within the plaintiff’s original claim. The mere allegation of an anticipated defense that arises by some provision of the constitution does not create a federal question giving a federal court jurisdiction.
37
Erie Doctrine
A federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction over a claim based on a sate created right or obligation must apply the substantive law of the defines how the facts in the case will be handled, as well as the elements. To a crime. In essence, it deals with the substance of the matter. Procedural law concerns the manner and means by which the right to recover is enforced.