Final LRQs Flashcards
13.1) Give brief summary of Greco-Roman view of body and spirit. How does this help explain 1 Cor 6:12-20?
G-R world held a stark dichotomy between body and spirit, with the spirit/mind almost always viewed as good, while the body bad and constraining good-mind. The two common conclusions of that few were aescetism or hedonism. 1 Cor 6 says both spirit and body belong to God, united to Christ, and ultimately good when reconciled to him, therefore how the body is employed matters too.
13.2) In what sense is the stomach not part of the σομα (body) for Paul?
In 1 Cor 6, Paul is using “stomach” as a close corollary to his normal usage of “flesh,” as a descriptor for the old body with its sinful appetites, which for the Christian is temporary, not ultimate. On the other hand, the “body” here (and in much of Paul) describes the Christians physical body which will be raised up and glorified, and so in that sense is ultimately good and godly.
13.3) How does 1 Cor 6:12-20 show the importance of the body? Give nuanced answer.
Against the commonly held dichotomy of body and soul/mind in Paul’s day (which is also implicitly held still often today), Paul strong asserts that the body and its activity matters greatly to God, is united with Christ, is an important part of the Christian’s new life indwelt by the Spirit and for God’s glory. Therefore the body is important, ultimately good, to be brought into subjection to God in obedience and honor.
14.1) How does 1 Cor 10:1-13, concerning Sinai events, relate to the food idol discussion of 1 Cor 8-10?
Paul is drawing a connection between some OT Israelites false assurance of fidelity due to participation in the visible community but despite their disobedience ; in the same way, some Corinthian Christians had false confidence due to visible inclusion and were flippant about idol-food activities
14.2) How does Cara exegete “baptized into Moses” (1 Cor 10:2)? What implications does this have for the meaning of Xn baptism?
Matches grammatical construction of Xn baptism, “baptised into Christ” ; therefore being baptized into someone means being incorporated into, identified with them; Therefore Xn baptism into Christ (re: Rom 6:3) involves identification with Christ (???)
14.3) Concerning 1 Cor 10:7-10, chose one of the four Sinai examples of Israel’s sins and relate this to the Corinthian Sitz im Leben.
1 Cor 10:8 refers to the severe punishment for sexual sin, intermarrying with the Moabites, 23-24k dead; Paul says this is was an instruction against sexual immorality for the Corinthians
15.1) How does Num 5:18 influence the view of 1 Cor 11:3-16 that the covering is long pulled up hair?
The Greek for “cover/uncover” in 1 Cor 11 is a cognate of the word used in Num 5:18 LXX for “unbind,” as in let down. This passage had to do with the priest letting down the hair of an adulterous woman
15.2) How would Cara square Gal 3:28 with 1 Cor 11:3 (“man is head of woman”)?
The headship in 1 Cor 11 refers to a relationship of authority and submission between man and woman, not just woman as the source of man in Gen. This interpretation supported by: parallel with God’s authority over humans; argument is for authority based on souce-ship; exousia-authority later in passage; Paul’s general theology of male headship
15.3) How does Cara qualify 1 Cor 14:34 (“Let women be silent in the churches”)? Give his rationale.
1 Cor 14 “be silent” refers to authoritative teaching - b/c 1 Cor 11 allows prayer and prophesy by women in public worship, but not interpret (decide on correctness of) prophesy.
16.1) According to Cara, how do the three major sections of 2 Cor exhibit literary unity?
Each of the 3 sections exhibits literary unity that suggests written around the same time; specifically each section deals with aspects related to Paul’s impending journey to Corinth.
17.1) Give best argument for “the love of X constrains us” (2 Cor 5:14) being an objective genitive?
Preceding verse, 5:13, clearly refers to Paul’s sentiment toward God - responsive behavior is the implication of the verse, therefore how we love God matters (?)
17.2) According to Cara, in the phrase “one died for all” from 2 Cor 5:14, who are the “all”? Give Cara’s justification for his answer.
in v.15 the “all” for whom Christ died corresponds with/results in (ινα) “the living ones” in the second part of the phrase - this suggests a limited atonement view, where the all Christ died for is all those who would live in him.
18.1) How does Tychicus tie together Eph, Col and Phlm?
He delivered the letters
18.2) Give Kümmel’s argument and one example concerning Eph not being Pauline.
Kummel argues that Eph was crafted with dependence upon Col, but substantive differences - e.g. in Eph, author’s use of church is entirely universal, unlike Col and most of his epistles
18.3) Cara cites Eph 2:6 to support contention that Eph emphasizes realized eschatology. What is Cara talking about?
Eph 2:6 speaks of Christians as already raised and seated in heaven with Christ; i.e. by our union with Christ the ultimate eschatalogical promises for Christians are already as good as done, and we experience some of their benefits and implications now.
19.1) Choose one subject in the Eph “blessing” and briefly trace it throughout Eph.
(7) “chose us to be holy” (Eph 1:4—Eph 4-6; - walk in love, many sanctification instructions
19.2) In Eph 1:3-14, what is different about vv 13-14? How does this relate to the remainder of Eph?
vv.13-14 the “you” is specifically Gentile Christians - this leads into the mystery of Gentile inclusion in the church in second half of 2 and 3
19.3) Give Cara’s exegesis of Eph 1:4 concerning its relationship to a Calvinistic (ie, Biblical) view of predestination.
We were chosen IN CHRIST - that is, even our election is on account of him, not us - and THAT we would be holy - i.e. not basis but the result of our election and salvation