Final From File 12 Flashcards
Marglin’s interpretation of the origins of the factory
By moving to a factory workers could not keep leftovers material anymore, meaning that in some way their pay got cut but they were working harder.
Marglin argued this was done for distributional motivation.
PROBLEM: factories first emerged in industries other than textile.
The possibility that production organization changes may be distributionally motivated to some significant degree makes the issue of production organization salient in labour relations.
Sub-Contracting
An owner hires them to do some parts of the job (like parts of the ship). This way the workers are less paid, the owner does not need to control labour, no contractual relationship between owner and workers, and there is no contact between the owner and technical difficulties.
Frederick Winslow Taylor/ Taylorism
Born from a wealthy family, on his way to become a lawyer at Harvard he had medical problem. Later he joined a trade company as a worker. This was surprising for someone from his background.
Taylorism was designed to i) reallocate knowledge to reunite expertise and position; and ii) to replace skilled with unskilled labour. The consequences of this were:
closer and more effective management control of work;
lower pay;
‘spiritually impoverishing’ work.
Taylorism increased output, but only by increasing inputs (making employees work harder) and cutting the price of inputs (that is, pay).Taylorism, then, was not distributionally neutral.
deskill
Reduce the number of tasks performed by each worker, including craftsmen’s responsibility for the care of their own tools.
The implications of this would be that: i) the relative supply of workers for each job would be increased; ii) workers would be more readily substitutable so that turnover would cause less of a problem.
All this should make it possible to pay workers less
Incentive pay
Incentive pay is financial reward for performance rather than pay for the number of hours worked. The idea is the prospect of financial compensation will motivate the employee to hit certain performance figures or financial targets.
Simplified tasks usually make it easier to monitor work and to count output.
Where output can be counted, pay can be tied to output.
Relocate knowledge
He allowed for shop floors knowledge to relocate to upper levels. There is now someone who understands both the higher needs of the company, and the lower needs and details of the work processes. Expertise and position have now been combined
Workers no longer monopolize knowledge about work processes
Mechanization
Spread because:
Power prices fell more rapidly than prices in general.
A series of innovations made machines work better:
-improved lubrication;
the substitution of steel for wrought iron;
-greater precision in the manufacture of moving parts;
-the invention of ball bearings.
Mechanization contributed to the development of a new set of industries – in particular, assembly industries
Logistical Strangulation
Improving only a part of the process (one of the machines and not the others) will leads to problems of balance.
FORD
Introduced the Model T wanting to sell it for cheap (by making its production cheaper). Introduced the pre-moving assembly line for Chassis where big parts were put together and skilled workers walked around where they were needed. Then came the moving assembly line where the part were brought to the worker and not the opposite, the tasks were also broken down to more simple tasks.
GM vs Ford
GM overtook Ford not because it revolutionized the production process but rather because it increased the size of the market.
GM offered a lot more options, better as the prices went up. They offered credits and trade ups for better cars as clients; income rose. GM developed a policy of relating the prices of used and new cars to market conditions
Technological Innovation in Longshoring industry
Objectives:
- speed up loading/unloading processes and turnaround time
- reduce labour costs
Expectations:
- reduction in need of labour
- more extensive mechanical use
- less individual theft
- elimination of jobs (only need a few skilled workers instead of many unskilled workers)
- ports displaced to more spacious locations because of logistical strangulation
- less companies
Reaction of unions
The first reaction of the unions was to reduce any productivity gains from the new technology: i) demand that containers be unloaded and reloaded on the dock; ii) preserve jobs through welt-like practices (say, in a work group of 8, 4 work, 4 watch); iii) attempt to maintain gang sizes irrespective the work to be done.
The Mechanization and Modernization Agreement
The provisions of the agreement included:
a management right to change working methods which implied almost total flexibility;
employers paid $5 million per year into an ILWU fund that provided retirement incentives: i) a longshoreman with 25 years seniority could retire with a $7920 cash payment and a pension of $100 per month; ii) longshoremen between 62 and 65 were paid $220 per month up to the age of 65, if they retired.
Containerization
It did not like predicted reduce theft because there was now organized crimes against them. Contenerizarion process was slow because productivity benefits were reduced by inappropriate conformity rules.
Pricing by commodity reduced the efficiency of containers because once they are all together in a container it does not matter their individuals characteristics.
Wood industry
Productivity depended on terrain.
It was hard to manage so they developed piece work (getting paid by the number of trees you cut), however this did not apply to machine workers because it would make them overuse the machines.
Evolution in the use of mechanical wood cutters
They started selling the machines to individuals so they wouldn’t overuse them. They were now being paid piece rate like the others.
The two explanations for the weak association
between computerization and productivity growth
On measurement:
standard growth accounting methods (summing expenditures or incomes) do not adequately
measure the benefits associated with: i) quality improvements; ii) product innovation; iii)
better customer service, including speed of delivery.
On the implications of GPT …
It is often argued that computers can only be used effectively if the right sorts of employees
are available and if production organization is suitably adjusted.
The use of computers has implications for the demand for skills. They could only contribute
to productivity growth if employees with the necessary skills are available.
Computers reduce the cost of smaller batch production. Producers had to recognize this to
use them effectively.
Related to the two points above, the efficient use of computers may require a substantial
reorganization of production, including shifting more responsibility in the work process to
workers themselves.
Marglin and Braverman’s argument
Production was reorganized for distributional reasons:
to extract more effort from employees (subjecting workers to supervision, increasing management’s ability to supervise);
to effectively reduce pay (eliminating appropriation of raw materials, reducing skill levels);
to appropriate the benefits of innovation (in Marglin’s account).
These cases suggest, then, that changes in production organization have not come at the expense of productivity growth. They’ve contributed to it. (chainsaw, moving assembly line, ect)
union effects on productivity growth
Unions usually don’t oppose the introduction of productivity-increasing new technology. Sometimes they urge it (e.g. the UMW in the 1950s and 1960s).
Union wage increases may speed up technological change. This happened in the ports.
There is no evidence of a temporal association between growth in productivity and unionization.
Unions do reduce flexibility (cf. the logging example). But they do not prevent the substitution of capital for labour. So the magnitude of the effect on flexibility and productivity is small.
Unions contribute to productivity growth in several ways. i) They provide a way of expressing discontent. In other words they make possible ‘voice’ rather than ‘exit’ as a way of responding to poor management. This reduces the costs of turnover. ii) Unionization and strikes may be responses to poor management. This means that unions may provide signals to owners that they should consider the replacement of the existing management. iii) Unions provide a structure through which management can discuss with employees ways to improve work practices and productivity.
Freeman and Medoff argue that, in aggregate, unions do not have a negative effect on productivity where there is product market competition
Unemployement rate
Who are unemployed?
People who do not have employment.
And who are seeking employment (in Canada, unless they are on temporary lay-off).
The unemployment rate is the number unemployed/the number in the labour
force.
The labour force includes both employed and unemployed
Therefore, the unemployment rate is: unemployed/(employed+unemployed)
This leaves another category not in the labour force or inactive: those who are
neither employed nor unemployed.
Discouraged worker effect
People may not seek jobs because they think there is no realistic prospect of finding one. This is
called a ‘discouraged worker effect’. Note that this may be offset by an ‘added worker effect’, when
the loss of a job by one member of a household induces another member to take a job.
Conclusions from unemployement gtaphs
unemployment goes up and down, displays no secular trend, but varies across countries.
male employment rates mostly don’t change much and, again, levels differ quite a bit
Female employment rates tend to rise but also differ across countries.
given that we know that technology often eliminates jobs why is there not
an aggregate effect?
- Product versus process innovations
Offsetting effects
Adaptive versus rational expectations
Product innovation
New products create new jobs (to make them)
Process innovation (Offsetting effects)
The new equipment has to be constructed.
By lowering the price you increase demand.
New equipment raises income which might be put into new employment.
If there is labour displacement as a result of an innovation, and if there is a reasonably competitive labour
market, then wages in the labour market are likely to fall and that should lead to a rise in employment.
technological unemployment is likely
where …
wages are rigid;
prices are rigid;
there is an absence of profitable investment opportunities (possibly linked to the
previous points) so that profits aren’t invested locally;
and expectations are adaptive rather than rational.
Unemployement measurement difficulties
Looking for work questions -0.7
Assignment of “short-term future starts” -0.2
Assignment of full-time students looking for work +0.3
Exclusion of native peoples reserves +0.1
Differential imprisonment -0.2
Summing the effects of these measurement difficulties: if Statistics Canada had the same practices/context as the US Bureau of Labor Statistics its unemployment rate would be about 0.8 of a percentage point lower.
Looking for work question:
In the US: People who are not actively looking for a job are not considered “unemployed”, meaning that these people are excluded for the labour force because they are not considered as having tried hard enough to find a job.
However in Canada they assume that everyone is trying hard enough and therefore everyone is counted as unemployed