final flash cards

1
Q

Present Possessory Estates

A

Fee Simple Absolute
Fee Tail
Defeasible Fees (3): FSD; FSCS; FSSEL
Life Estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fee Simple Absolute

A

“To A” traditionally “To A and his heirs”

Lasts forever (possibly infinite duration)

Devisable, descendible, & alienable

F.I. Only A has ABSOLUTE ownership b/c heirs only exist at A’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defeasible Fees

A

Fee Simple Determinable

Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent

Fee Simple Subject to Executory Limitation

Can last forever, but are limited/conditioned

All are alienable, devisable, and descendible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ADD

A

Alienable - capable of sale or transfer inter vivos

Devisable - can pass by will

Descendible - can pass by statutes of intestacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fee Simple Determinable

A

“To A during” “To A until”

Grantor must use CLEAR durational language

If stated condition is violated or not actualized, forfeiture (termination) is automatic

F.I. Possibility of reverter in O

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent

A

“To A, but if X event occurs, grantor reserves right to reenter & retake”

Grantor must use CLEAR durational language AND explicitly carve out the right to reenter

Not automatically terminated & endures even in presence of breach of condition unless & until O exercises right to retake

F.I. O has right of entry and power to terminate (RE/PT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Life Estate

A
  1. “To A for life” 2. “To A for the life of B”
  2. A has LE, B has LE pur autre vie (for A’s lifetime, not B’s)
  3. A has LE pur autre vie (for B’s lifetime, not A’s)

Life tenant must not commit waste: affirmative, permissive, ameliorative

F.I. O has reversion, 3rd party has a remainder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Open Mines Doctrine

A

LE prohibits T from committing waste

This is an exception that allows voluntary waste to deplete natural resources but only if the mine already existed and was open when T took possession (no new mines)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Future Interests for O

A

There are only 3 F.I. capable of creation in O, the grantor:

Possibility of Reverter

Right of entry / Power of Termination (RE/PT)

Reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Possibility of Reverter

A

Fee Simple Determinable ONLY

Becomes possessory ONLY on termination of FSA

Not subject to RAP

Frank Sinatra Didn’t Prefer Orville Redenbacher
Fee Simple Determinable Possibility of Reverter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Right of Entry / Power of Termination

A

Accompanies Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent ONLY

Devisable & Descendible

Transferrable inter vivos ONLY when coupled w/ a reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reversion

A

Things only revert BACK, not forward

When O has transferred lesser estate than they own –>alienable, descendible, devisable

Does not apply to defeasible fees, usually LE

Not subject to RAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Future Interests for Transferees

A

F.I. held by someone other than O

Vested Remainder
Contingent Remainder
Executory Interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Remainder

A

O NEVER has a remainder

NEVER follows a defeasible fee

NO GAP: Becomes possessory on the natural expiration or conclusion of prior possessory estate –> can never cut short preceding estate

C/L - transferor could not create an estate in a 3rd party to commence in the future

Modern - Follows LE or Term of Years (leasehold)
“To A for life, then to B” “To A for 10 yrs, then B”

must be created at same time as preceding supporting estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Vested Remainder

A

Created in born, ascertained person

NOT subject to a condition precedent

3 Types: Indefeasibly, Subject to Partial Divestment, Subject to Total Divestment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contingent Remainder

A

Unborn, unascertained person
AND/OR
Subject to condition precedent

“To A for life, then to B’s first child”
“To A for life then to B for life IF HE MARRIES”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Indefeasibly Vested Remainder

A

Totally Vested

Holder of remainder certain to acquire an estate in the future, no conditions or strings attached

“To A for life, remainder to B”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Vested Remainder Subject to Total Divestment

A

Holder of remainder exists

Right to possess, time w/ land can be cut short b/c of condition subsequent (NOT precedent)

If condition is alone b/c it is set off by commas, it is subsequent, not precedent

“To A for life, remainder to B, but if B dies under 25, to C.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Vested Remainder Subject to Partial Divestment

A

Vested Remainder Subject to Open

Vested in a group, category or class of takers --> at least one qualified to take possession
**if no one qualified, it is a contingent R

Open b/c it’s possible for others to enter, even unborn or unascertained
Closed when max membership set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Rule of Convenience

A

C/L - clear, bright line rule applies unless O specifically drafted otherwise

When any one member of the class has right to possession, the class closes

"To A for life, then to B's children"
Class closes at B's death, and rule says at A's death even if B is alive b/c present class members can demand possession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Executory Interest

A

Unlike a remainder, executory interests cut short another transferee (shifting) or cuts short the grantor (springing)

  1. cut short preceding present possessory estate or vested future interest
  2. takes effect after a gap in time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Shifting Executory Interest

A

Always follows a defeasible fee

Cuts short someone other than O

“To A and his heirs, but if B returns from Europe within next year, then to B”
B is in a position to cut short A’s time with land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Springing Executory Interest

A

Takes effect by cutting short or divesting O

“To A, if and when he marries”
When A marries, A cuts short O’s otherwise limitless time w/ land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Rule Against Perpetuities

A

C/L rule that requires interests to vest, if at all, within a stipulated time

Bright line rules:

  1. A gift to an open class conditioned on members reaching an age beyond 21 will violate the RAP b/c of principle “Bad as to one, bad as to all”
    - ->To be valid, C.P. to every members taking will be within the perpetuities period
  2. Many SHIFTING executory interests will violate the RAP if there is no limit on time within which it must vest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
4 Steps RAP
1. Which future interests have been created by the conveyance? - -> CR, Exec. Interests, and certain VR subject to open; NEVER applies to reverter 2. Identify the conditions precedent to vesting of the F.I. - -> what must happen before they can take 3. Find a measuring life - -> is their life or death relevant to C.P. 4. Will we know w/ certainty, w/in 10 years of death of our measuring life, if our future interest holder(s) can or cannot take?
26
Reform of C/L RAP
"Wait & See" or "Second Look Doctrine" -->Wait until measuring life ends, then take 2nd look to gauge validity of future interest USRAP (Uniform Statutory) -->Codifies C/L & gives alternative 90yrs
27
Concurrent Interests
When more than one entity owns the land at the same time Joint Tenancy Tenancy by the Entirety Tenancy in Common
28
Joint Tenancy
Joint tenants share ROS JT can sell/transfer interest inter vivos w/o consent of others Terminates by inter vivos sale or conveyance, or by partition Traditionally - requires 4 unities Modernly - unities overlooked but not ignored
29
Four Unities (Tess's TIP)
Joint tenants must take their interest: at the same Time by the same Title with shares Identical identical rights to Possess
30
Right of Survivorship
Joint T who survives all other joint T's becomes the sole owner of entire property All Joint T's are still alive, one dies, that share is divided equally amongst all others with ROS ONLY Joint T's can freely convey their interest, but it will sever ROS for the 3rd party, who will have a TIC
31
Tenancy in Common
T's concurrently own the same or diff % interests Each T has a right to possess subject to every other T's right Hold undivided interests in whole property --> each co-T owns individual part w/ right to whole Can freely convey & it passes to heirs at death NO ROS
32
Partition
A way to terminate a joint tenancy 1. Voluntary: amicable, peaceful, privately end relationship 2. Partition in Kind: judicial action where court orders physical division of the property if in the best interests of all --> preferred to avoid prejudice --> not required to share proceeds 3. Forced Sale: court ordered, proceeds divided proportionately --> applicable when it is a small amount of land or a building that can't be divided
33
Tenancy by the Entirety
Limited to married couples --> doesn't matter if they marry later Includes ROS Cannot be severed unilaterally May convey to 3rd party
34
Adverse Possession Elements
1. Possession - -> must actually enter/go onto land & use it 2. Exclusive 3. Continuous/Uninterrupted (for statutory period) 4. Hostile/Adverse/Claim of Right - ->possessor doesn't have owner's permission to be there & is adverse to color of title 5. Open & Notorious (occupation is visible)
35
Color of Title
Written instrument or deed Advantage: if you have this and someone tries to come onto your land, it is constructive adverse possession for ALL of the property, not just the portion the A.P.er entered/occupied
36
Tacking
To satisfy the statutory period, adverse possessors may tack his time with land together with predecessor's time if there is privity of possession privity of estate not necessary, but some voluntary agreement: deed, will, heir, intestacy
37
Disabilities
The SOL will not run when a true owner is severely mentally ill or impaired, has minor status, and sometimes when they are imprisoned If more than one, SOL tolled until BOTH removed Disabilities CANNOT be tacked -->only if disability is present when A.P.er entered does the SOL tack, not any subsequent arising ones
38
Servitudes
Non-possessory interests in land Easement (Affirmative or Negative) Covenant (Real or Equitable) Profit (not used often)
39
Easements
Arises from private agreement between land owner and owner of the servitude No magic words of statutory limitations (must only show intention of parties) Must be in writing per SOF unless it is an implied easement
40
Affirmative Easement
Right to enter another's burdened land & use it in some specified way
41
Negative Easement
Right to limit or prohibit some use of the burdened land
42
Easement Appurtenant (to land)
Benefits the land or easement holder in his physical use or enjoyment of HIS OWN LAND (can be implied or owner is silent) Two parcels of land must be involved: Servient tenement - burdened land Dominant tenement - benefitted land Transferred automatically w/ dominant tenement
43
Easement (held) In Gross
Easement holder receives only a personal or commercial gain, not linked to holder's use & enjoyment of his own land (expressly stated) Only servient tenement --> no dominant since the benefit is not connected to his own land C/L - could not be transferred Modern - Not transferrable unless for commercial purposes (unless expressly prohibited) **hint: if only one parcel involved & it is servient, you have in gross
44
Affirmative Easement Creation (PING)
Prescription - implied by a reference to a plat Implication - prior use; Witt Necessity - no prior use needed Grant (Express Provision) - Corbett
45
Easement by Prescription (Statute)
Elements of adverse possession must be satisfied, but doesn't necessarily have to be exclusive CAN be for commercial purposes MUST be hostile, permission defeats the acquisition of this easement
46
Easement by Implication
Implied from prior or existing use (QUASI EASEMENT) 1. Permanent & Obvious 2. Continuity 3. Reasonable Necessity (*if necessity goes away, easement implied by prior use is uneffected*) Can't have easement in own land but can have a quasi easement quasi-servient: land benefits another portion quasi-dominant: portion that has benefitted Implied by necessity --> in reference to subdivision or plat
47
Easement by Necessity
Majority - showing of reasonable necessity is required Minority - Must be STRICT necessity based on PRIOR USE; if there is another way to landlocked parcel, no matter how inconvenient, must be used Defeasible - can go away if necessity goes away
48
Implied Necessity
Unity of ownership Severance of title STRICT NECESSITY - split of authority if we are applying the easement based on quasi-easement Goes away when necessity goes away (policy reason) prior use must have been intended to continue
49
Easement by Grant
SOF applies --> an easement for more than one year MUST be in writing: Deed of Easement
50
Overburden or Surcharge Servient Tenement
Reasonable change in the use by the dominant tenement Express Easement - cannot be used in such a way that overburdens, surcharges, or places unreasonable burden on tenement Expressly Limited - when easement is created, no use can be made that is expressly limited Not Expressly Limited - any purpose reasonably devoted of the dominant tenement; what parties intended; circumstantial; dominant t can change & still be used if it doesn't overburden servient Dominant is Divided and Conveyed Away - can still be used if it doesn't overburden servient
51
One Stock
If we all own an easement in gross we cannot transfer together Must be used as if by one person Everyone must agree - so the servient tenement isn't overburdened
52
Termination of Easement (END)
ESTOPPEL - servient builds or improves based on reliance that holder is done with easement NECESSITY - if not based on prior use, terminates w/ end of necessity DEFEASIBLE - Expressly or implied, building goes down, parking is defeased
53
Termination of Easement (CRAMPP)
CONDEMNATION - of servient tenement, by gov eminent domain power RELEASE - by easement holder ABANDONMENT - must be an easement, cannot be an FSA MERGER - easement ends when that and title to servient T becomes vested in same person PURCHASE - O sells easement PRESCRIPTION - Servient T interferes w/ easement in accordance w/ adverse possession elements
54
License
An authority to do a particular act or series of acts upon another's land, without possessing a state there in No interest in land CAN be created ORALLY (no SOF)
55
License Revoked
Revocable at will of the licensor Owner can change mind at any time, but must give reasonable notice Minority - does not recognize estoppel Majority - license becomes irrevocable by estoppel (becomes implied easement)
56
Real Covenant
Becomes a real covenant when it is capable of running with the land (bind successors to original contracting or covenanting parties) Minority - Only negative (restrictive) covenants enforceable Majority - Affirmative AND negative
57
Defeasible Agreement v. Covenant
Defeasible agreement strips the possessory interest There is no possessory interest in a covenant
58
Negative (Restrictive) Covenant
A promise to refrain from doing something related to land Most real covenants are restrictive (promise not to build for commercial purposes)
59
Affirmative Covenant
A promise to do something related to the land | promise to maintain good repair our common fence) (promise to pay dues to homeowners' association
60
Equitable Servitude
Mutually Beneficial MAJORITY Only ONE instance it can be created by implication (common scheme or plan of single family residential subdivisions, S. v. McLain) Otherwise MUST be in writing MINORITY NO E.S. may arise by implication under ANY circumstance
61
General Scheme or Conformity
Brochures, realtor General conformity Appearance
62
Elements for Real Covenants/Equitable Servitude
1. Must comply w/ SOF - valid contract in writing - not against policy or too vague 2. Intention for the burdens, and burdens run with the land 3. Touch & Concern 4. Privity of Estate *not for E.S.* 5. Notice
63
Intention for Burdens That Run w/ Land (RC/ES)
More than personal Benefit to one successor, burden to other MODERN - clear, no magicwords C/L - need word ASSIGNED
64
Touch and Concern (RC/ES)
Both benefits and burdens touch & concern the land (sufficiently related) Not merely personal Negative Cov. - restrictions T&C Affirmative Cov - maintain common area out of own pocket Covenants Not to Compete - could run with land
65
Privity of Estate (RC/ES)
BURDEN to Run - both BENEFIT to Run - vertical Horizontal - promise made in "succession of estate" or in grantor-grantee, LL-T, debtor-creditor relationship Vertical - non-hostile, by contract, blood relation, or devise
66
Notice (RC/ES)
Must have had some form of notice of the promise when she took (AIR) Actual - literally & actually informed of the covenants existence Inquiry - NO inquiry notice Record - if burdened party had notice the real owner will take