final flash cards

1
Q

Present Possessory Estates

A

Fee Simple Absolute
Fee Tail
Defeasible Fees (3): FSD; FSCS; FSSEL
Life Estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fee Simple Absolute

A

“To A” traditionally “To A and his heirs”

Lasts forever (possibly infinite duration)

Devisable, descendible, & alienable

F.I. Only A has ABSOLUTE ownership b/c heirs only exist at A’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defeasible Fees

A

Fee Simple Determinable

Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent

Fee Simple Subject to Executory Limitation

Can last forever, but are limited/conditioned

All are alienable, devisable, and descendible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ADD

A

Alienable - capable of sale or transfer inter vivos

Devisable - can pass by will

Descendible - can pass by statutes of intestacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fee Simple Determinable

A

“To A during” “To A until”

Grantor must use CLEAR durational language

If stated condition is violated or not actualized, forfeiture (termination) is automatic

F.I. Possibility of reverter in O

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent

A

“To A, but if X event occurs, grantor reserves right to reenter & retake”

Grantor must use CLEAR durational language AND explicitly carve out the right to reenter

Not automatically terminated & endures even in presence of breach of condition unless & until O exercises right to retake

F.I. O has right of entry and power to terminate (RE/PT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Life Estate

A
  1. “To A for life” 2. “To A for the life of B”
  2. A has LE, B has LE pur autre vie (for A’s lifetime, not B’s)
  3. A has LE pur autre vie (for B’s lifetime, not A’s)

Life tenant must not commit waste: affirmative, permissive, ameliorative

F.I. O has reversion, 3rd party has a remainder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Open Mines Doctrine

A

LE prohibits T from committing waste

This is an exception that allows voluntary waste to deplete natural resources but only if the mine already existed and was open when T took possession (no new mines)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Future Interests for O

A

There are only 3 F.I. capable of creation in O, the grantor:

Possibility of Reverter

Right of entry / Power of Termination (RE/PT)

Reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Possibility of Reverter

A

Fee Simple Determinable ONLY

Becomes possessory ONLY on termination of FSA

Not subject to RAP

Frank Sinatra Didn’t Prefer Orville Redenbacher
Fee Simple Determinable Possibility of Reverter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Right of Entry / Power of Termination

A

Accompanies Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent ONLY

Devisable & Descendible

Transferrable inter vivos ONLY when coupled w/ a reversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reversion

A

Things only revert BACK, not forward

When O has transferred lesser estate than they own –>alienable, descendible, devisable

Does not apply to defeasible fees, usually LE

Not subject to RAP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Future Interests for Transferees

A

F.I. held by someone other than O

Vested Remainder
Contingent Remainder
Executory Interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Remainder

A

O NEVER has a remainder

NEVER follows a defeasible fee

NO GAP: Becomes possessory on the natural expiration or conclusion of prior possessory estate –> can never cut short preceding estate

C/L - transferor could not create an estate in a 3rd party to commence in the future

Modern - Follows LE or Term of Years (leasehold)
“To A for life, then to B” “To A for 10 yrs, then B”

must be created at same time as preceding supporting estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Vested Remainder

A

Created in born, ascertained person

NOT subject to a condition precedent

3 Types: Indefeasibly, Subject to Partial Divestment, Subject to Total Divestment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contingent Remainder

A

Unborn, unascertained person
AND/OR
Subject to condition precedent

“To A for life, then to B’s first child”
“To A for life then to B for life IF HE MARRIES”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Indefeasibly Vested Remainder

A

Totally Vested

Holder of remainder certain to acquire an estate in the future, no conditions or strings attached

“To A for life, remainder to B”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Vested Remainder Subject to Total Divestment

A

Holder of remainder exists

Right to possess, time w/ land can be cut short b/c of condition subsequent (NOT precedent)

If condition is alone b/c it is set off by commas, it is subsequent, not precedent

“To A for life, remainder to B, but if B dies under 25, to C.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Vested Remainder Subject to Partial Divestment

A

Vested Remainder Subject to Open

Vested in a group, category or class of takers --> at least one qualified to take possession
**if no one qualified, it is a contingent R

Open b/c it’s possible for others to enter, even unborn or unascertained
Closed when max membership set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Rule of Convenience

A

C/L - clear, bright line rule applies unless O specifically drafted otherwise

When any one member of the class has right to possession, the class closes

"To A for life, then to B's children"
Class closes at B's death, and rule says at A's death even if B is alive b/c present class members can demand possession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Executory Interest

A

Unlike a remainder, executory interests cut short another transferee (shifting) or cuts short the grantor (springing)

  1. cut short preceding present possessory estate or vested future interest
  2. takes effect after a gap in time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Shifting Executory Interest

A

Always follows a defeasible fee

Cuts short someone other than O

“To A and his heirs, but if B returns from Europe within next year, then to B”
B is in a position to cut short A’s time with land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Springing Executory Interest

A

Takes effect by cutting short or divesting O

“To A, if and when he marries”
When A marries, A cuts short O’s otherwise limitless time w/ land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Rule Against Perpetuities

A

C/L rule that requires interests to vest, if at all, within a stipulated time

Bright line rules:

  1. A gift to an open class conditioned on members reaching an age beyond 21 will violate the RAP b/c of principle “Bad as to one, bad as to all”
    - ->To be valid, C.P. to every members taking will be within the perpetuities period
  2. Many SHIFTING executory interests will violate the RAP if there is no limit on time within which it must vest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

4 Steps RAP

A
  1. Which future interests have been created by the conveyance?
    - -> CR, Exec. Interests, and certain VR subject to open; NEVER applies to reverter
  2. Identify the conditions precedent to vesting of the F.I.
    - -> what must happen before they can take
  3. Find a measuring life
    - -> is their life or death relevant to C.P.
  4. Will we know w/ certainty, w/in 10 years of death of our measuring life, if our future interest holder(s) can or cannot take?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Reform of C/L RAP

A

“Wait & See” or “Second Look Doctrine”
–>Wait until measuring life ends, then take 2nd look to gauge validity of future interest

USRAP (Uniform Statutory)
–>Codifies C/L & gives alternative 90yrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Concurrent Interests

A

When more than one entity owns the land at the same time

Joint Tenancy
Tenancy by the Entirety
Tenancy in Common

28
Q

Joint Tenancy

A

Joint tenants share ROS

JT can sell/transfer interest inter vivos w/o consent of others

Terminates by inter vivos sale or conveyance, or by partition

Traditionally - requires 4 unities
Modernly - unities overlooked but not ignored

29
Q

Four Unities (Tess’s TIP)

A

Joint tenants must take their interest:

at the same Time
by the same Title
with shares Identical
identical rights to Possess

30
Q

Right of Survivorship

A

Joint T who survives all other joint T’s becomes the sole owner of entire property

All Joint T’s are still alive, one dies, that share is divided equally amongst all others with ROS ONLY

Joint T’s can freely convey their interest, but it will sever ROS for the 3rd party, who will have a TIC

31
Q

Tenancy in Common

A

T’s concurrently own the same or diff % interests

Each T has a right to possess subject to every other T’s right

Hold undivided interests in whole property –> each co-T owns individual part w/ right to whole

Can freely convey & it passes to heirs at death

NO ROS

32
Q

Partition

A

A way to terminate a joint tenancy

  1. Voluntary: amicable, peaceful, privately end relationship
  2. Partition in Kind: judicial action where court orders physical division of the property if in the best interests of all –> preferred to avoid prejudice –> not required to share proceeds
  3. Forced Sale: court ordered, proceeds divided proportionately –> applicable when it is a small amount of land or a building that can’t be divided
33
Q

Tenancy by the Entirety

A

Limited to married couples –> doesn’t matter if they marry later

Includes ROS

Cannot be severed unilaterally

May convey to 3rd party

34
Q

Adverse Possession Elements

A
  1. Possession
    - -> must actually enter/go onto land & use it
  2. Exclusive
  3. Continuous/Uninterrupted (for statutory period)
  4. Hostile/Adverse/Claim of Right
    - ->possessor doesn’t have owner’s permission to be there & is adverse to color of title
  5. Open & Notorious (occupation is visible)
35
Q

Color of Title

A

Written instrument or deed

Advantage: if you have this and someone tries to come onto your land, it is constructive adverse possession for ALL of the property, not just the portion the A.P.er entered/occupied

36
Q

Tacking

A

To satisfy the statutory period, adverse possessors may tack his time with land together with predecessor’s time if there is privity of possession

privity of estate not necessary, but some voluntary agreement: deed, will, heir, intestacy

37
Q

Disabilities

A

The SOL will not run when a true owner is severely mentally ill or impaired, has minor status, and sometimes when they are imprisoned

If more than one, SOL tolled until BOTH removed

Disabilities CANNOT be tacked
–>only if disability is present when A.P.er entered does the SOL tack, not any subsequent arising ones

38
Q

Servitudes

A

Non-possessory interests in land

Easement (Affirmative or Negative)
Covenant (Real or Equitable)
Profit (not used often)

39
Q

Easements

A

Arises from private agreement between land owner and owner of the servitude

No magic words of statutory limitations (must only show intention of parties)

Must be in writing per SOF unless it is an implied easement

40
Q

Affirmative Easement

A

Right to enter another’s burdened land & use it in some specified way

41
Q

Negative Easement

A

Right to limit or prohibit some use of the burdened land

42
Q

Easement Appurtenant (to land)

A

Benefits the land or easement holder in his physical use or enjoyment of HIS OWN LAND
(can be implied or owner is silent)

Two parcels of land must be involved:
Servient tenement - burdened land
Dominant tenement - benefitted land

Transferred automatically w/ dominant tenement

43
Q

Easement (held) In Gross

A

Easement holder receives only a personal or commercial gain, not linked to holder’s use & enjoyment of his own land (expressly stated)

Only servient tenement –> no dominant since the benefit is not connected to his own land

C/L - could not be transferred
Modern - Not transferrable unless for commercial purposes (unless expressly prohibited)

**hint: if only one parcel involved & it is servient, you have in gross

44
Q

Affirmative Easement Creation (PING)

A

Prescription - implied by a reference to a plat

Implication - prior use; Witt

Necessity - no prior use needed

Grant (Express Provision) - Corbett

45
Q

Easement by Prescription (Statute)

A

Elements of adverse possession must be satisfied, but doesn’t necessarily have to be exclusive

CAN be for commercial purposes

MUST be hostile, permission defeats the acquisition of this easement

46
Q

Easement by Implication

A

Implied from prior or existing use (QUASI EASEMENT)

  1. Permanent & Obvious
  2. Continuity
  3. Reasonable Necessity (if necessity goes away, easement implied by prior use is uneffected)

Can’t have easement in own land but can have a quasi easement
quasi-servient: land benefits another portion
quasi-dominant: portion that has benefitted

Implied by necessity –> in reference to subdivision or plat

47
Q

Easement by Necessity

A

Majority - showing of reasonable necessity is required

Minority - Must be STRICT necessity based on PRIOR USE; if there is another way to landlocked parcel, no matter how inconvenient, must be used

Defeasible - can go away if necessity goes away

48
Q

Implied Necessity

A

Unity of ownership

Severance of title

STRICT NECESSITY - split of authority if we are applying the easement based on quasi-easement

Goes away when necessity goes away (policy reason) prior use must have been intended to continue

49
Q

Easement by Grant

A

SOF applies –> an easement for more than one year MUST be in writing: Deed of Easement

50
Q

Overburden or Surcharge Servient Tenement

A

Reasonable change in the use by the dominant tenement

Express Easement - cannot be used in such a way that overburdens, surcharges, or places unreasonable burden on tenement

Expressly Limited - when easement is created, no use can be made that is expressly limited

Not Expressly Limited - any purpose reasonably devoted of the dominant tenement; what parties intended; circumstantial; dominant t can change & still be used if it doesn’t overburden servient

Dominant is Divided and Conveyed Away - can still be used if it doesn’t overburden servient

51
Q

One Stock

A

If we all own an easement in gross we cannot transfer together

Must be used as if by one person

Everyone must agree - so the servient tenement isn’t overburdened

52
Q

Termination of Easement (END)

A

ESTOPPEL - servient builds or improves based on reliance that holder is done with easement

NECESSITY - if not based on prior use, terminates w/ end of necessity

DEFEASIBLE - Expressly or implied, building goes down, parking is defeased

53
Q

Termination of Easement (CRAMPP)

A

CONDEMNATION - of servient tenement, by gov eminent domain power

RELEASE - by easement holder

ABANDONMENT - must be an easement, cannot be an FSA

MERGER - easement ends when that and title to servient T becomes vested in same person

PURCHASE - O sells easement

PRESCRIPTION - Servient T interferes w/ easement in accordance w/ adverse possession elements

54
Q

License

A

An authority to do a particular act or series of acts upon another’s land, without possessing a state there in

No interest in land

CAN be created ORALLY (no SOF)

55
Q

License Revoked

A

Revocable at will of the licensor

Owner can change mind at any time, but must give reasonable notice

Minority - does not recognize estoppel

Majority - license becomes irrevocable by estoppel (becomes implied easement)

56
Q

Real Covenant

A

Becomes a real covenant when it is capable of running with the land (bind successors to original contracting or covenanting parties)

Minority - Only negative (restrictive) covenants enforceable

Majority - Affirmative AND negative

57
Q

Defeasible Agreement v. Covenant

A

Defeasible agreement strips the possessory interest

There is no possessory interest in a covenant

58
Q

Negative (Restrictive) Covenant

A

A promise to refrain from doing something related to land

Most real covenants are restrictive

(promise not to build for commercial purposes)

59
Q

Affirmative Covenant

A

A promise to do something related to the land

promise to maintain good repair our common fence) (promise to pay dues to homeowners’ association

60
Q

Equitable Servitude

A

Mutually Beneficial

MAJORITY
Only ONE instance it can be created by implication (common scheme or plan of single family residential subdivisions, S. v. McLain)
Otherwise MUST be in writing

MINORITY
NO E.S. may arise by implication under ANY circumstance

61
Q

General Scheme or Conformity

A

Brochures, realtor
General conformity
Appearance

62
Q

Elements for Real Covenants/Equitable Servitude

A
  1. Must comply w/ SOF
    - valid contract in writing
    - not against policy or too vague
  2. Intention for the burdens, and burdens run with the land
  3. Touch & Concern
  4. Privity of Estate not for E.S.
  5. Notice
63
Q

Intention for Burdens That Run w/ Land (RC/ES)

A

More than personal

Benefit to one successor, burden to other

MODERN - clear, no magicwords
C/L - need word ASSIGNED

64
Q

Touch and Concern (RC/ES)

A

Both benefits and burdens touch & concern the land (sufficiently related)

Not merely personal

Negative Cov. - restrictions T&C

Affirmative Cov - maintain common area out of own pocket

Covenants Not to Compete - could run with land

65
Q

Privity of Estate (RC/ES)

A

BURDEN to Run - both
BENEFIT to Run - vertical

Horizontal - promise made in “succession of estate” or in grantor-grantee, LL-T, debtor-creditor relationship

Vertical - non-hostile, by contract, blood relation, or devise

66
Q

Notice (RC/ES)

A

Must have had some form of notice of the promise when she took (AIR)

Actual - literally & actually informed of the covenants existence

Inquiry - NO inquiry notice

Record - if burdened party had notice the real owner will take