Final Fill in the Blank Flashcards
Personal jurisdiction requires that the defendant be ______ to the forum state’s jurisdiction, and that the defendant be ______________.
amenable, served with proper notice
Amenability to personal jurisdiction is governed by the _______, subject to the limits of the _______ of the United States Constitution.
forum state’s law, due process clause
Pennoyer v. Neff described three bases for state jurisdiction over persons and things. Theyare
a. ________: jurisdiction over the person
b. ________: jurisdiction over interests in property
c. ________: jurisdiction over seized property, where plaintiff’s claim is unrelated to the seized property.
In personam, In rem, Quasi in rem
Pennoyer based its jurisdictional formula on ______ over persons and property within its borders.
state power
Under Pennoyer’s in personam jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor
—would be _____ in all states
—for the _____ of damages
—may be _______ until fully collected
binding in all states , full amount of damages, enforced repeatedly until fully collected
Under Pennoyer’s in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in favor of plaintiff
—affects ________ in a res (both _____ and _____ to the lawsuit)
—does not result in a ___________
— does not require ______ outside the forum
everyone’s interests, parties, nonparties
money judgment
enforcement
Under Pennoyer’s quasi in rem jurisdiction, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor:
—entitles plaintiff to the ____________________
—is not a _________
—is not __________________
—may not be enforced ____________
—may not be enforced ____________
property attached for jurisdiction, personal judgment enforceable against any other property more than once outside the forum
Another type of jurisdiction not discussed in Pennoyer is ______, which involves the state’s authority to adjudicate such matters as divorce, adoption, citizenship and mental competence.
status
__________________ altered Pennoyer’s rule for personal jurisdiction, replacing the concept of ________ with the new standards of _________ and ________ provided by the “minimum contacts test.”
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
state power
reasonableness
fairness
The current test for amenability, following International Shoe and other cases, does not require the minimum contacts test if the defendant satisfies any one of the four “traditional” bases for in personam jurisdiction. Those bases are: \_\_\_\_\_\_ in the forum state \_\_\_\_\_\_ to jurisdiction \_\_\_\_\_\_ of objection to jurisdiction \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ in the forum when served
Residence in the forum state
Consent to jurisdiction
Waiver of objection to jurisdiction
Physical presence in the forum when served
Consent to jurisdiction has two forms, _______ and _______. ________ are an example of express consent, and ___________ are an example of implied consent.
express consent and implied consent
Forum selection clauses
non-resident motorists statutes
If none of the traditional bases are present, a state may only exercise in personam jurisdiction over defendants who have minimum contacts with the state. The two categories of minimum contacts are ________ and ___________
specific jurisdiction and general jurisdiction.
___________ is where the lawsuit arises from or relates to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state. ___________ is where the lawsuit is unrelated to the nonresident defendant’s contacts with the forum state.
Specific jurisdiction
General jurisdiction
Specific jurisdiction has four contacts tests, which are that the defendant
a. _________ itself of the benefits and protections of forum law;
b. should have _______ that its activity would subject it to jurisdiction in the forum state;
c. could __________ being haled into court in the forum state;
d. placed its product in the __________ and could foresee that it would be used in the forum state.
purposefully availed
foreseen
reasonably anticipate
stream of commerce
General jurisdiction has one contact test, which is that it has ___________ with the forum state.
continuous and systematic contacts
If the defendant has no contacts with the forum (and does not meet one of the four traditional bases of jurisdiction), then there is ___________ over that defendant. If, on the other hand, defendant does have specific or general contacts, then the court must consider the ___________ test. This is a ________ test with five factors, which are:
—______________
—________ interest in convenient and effective relief
—______________
—the _______________ in furthering fundamental social policies
—the _______________ in effective resolution of controversies
no personal jurisdiction
fair play and substantial justice
balancing
burden on the defendant plaintiff’s the forum state’s interest shared interests of several states judicial system’s interest
The due process requirement for notice to defendant is stated in Mullane v. Central Hanover. Notice is constitutionally sufficient if it is “____________, under all circumstances, to apprise ________ parties of the pendency of the action, and afford them an __________ and __________.”
reasonably calculated
interested
opportunity to appear
present objections
An abbreviated version of the Mullane notice rule is that _________ requires ______ and an ____________.
due process
notice
opportunity to be heard
Which rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure deals with initially notifying the defendant of the lawsuit? _____
Rule 4
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, the two primary methods for service of process on a competent adult are:
a. ___________ to defendant;
b. leaving copies at ___________ with a person of ____________
personal delivery
defendant’s residence
suitable age and discretion.
In most cases, the federal method of service on defendants outside the district is by the ________ statute of the state in which the federal court sits.
long-arm
The purposes of venue rules are:
(a) ________ to defendant
(b) __________ of caseload within the forum state
fairness
geographic allocation
The federal statute for general venue provisions is __________
28 U.S.C. 1391.
The purpose of forum non conveniens is to move _______________________________________
cases from one forum to another based on fairness and convenience.
Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to adjudicate based on the _____________ and in some cases, ________________________.
type of case
the dollar amount in controversy
Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over two types of cases: ________;__________
—federal question
—diversity of citizenship
The statute dealing with general federal question jurisdiction is _______________. It provides that federal courts have jurisdiction over any _______________________________
28 U.S.C. § 1331
case or controversy arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
In addition to the general federal question provisions in 28 U.S.C. § 1331, there are specific statutes on federal question jurisdiction, including actions against (name three):
foreign states, admiralty, patents, civil rights, consuls, internal revenue, and United States as plaintiff or defendant.
Diversity jurisdiction is covered by ______________. That statute provides that federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over claims between _________________, or between __________ and ___________, where the amount in controversy ______________.
28 U.S.C. § 1332
citizens of different states
state citizens and foreign citizens
exceeds $75000
Although the Constitution requires only _____________, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires ___________ diversity. This means that all plaintiffs must have different citizenship than all defendants.
partial diversity
complete
For diversity purposes, a corporation has two citizenships, which are:
a. ______________
b. ______________
state of incorporation
principal place of business
For diversity purposes, partnerships have the citizenship of ______________.
all the partners
The amount in controversy is determined by plaintiff’s __________________.
good faith pleading
In achieving the amount in controversy, may Plaintiff aggregate (answer “yes” or “no”):
a. all of Plaintiff’s claims against one defendant?
b. alternate theories of recovery for the same wrong?
c. claims of different plaintiffs?
d. claims against different defendants?
Yes
No
No
No
In some cases, a related claim that lacks diversity or federal question jurisdiction may be included. This is called _______________.
supplemental jurisdiction
Federal courts traditionally abstain from _________, _________ and _____________.
family law, probate and state criminal proceedings.
If plaintiff has filed his action in state court, and jurisdiction is proper in federal court, defendant may remove the case to federal court. This is done by filing a _____________ in federal court, attaching a copy of ___________ and _________ to the state court and all parties.
Notice of Removal
all state court pleadings
giving notice
If there is a ____________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court no matter when the objection is made.
jurisdictional
If there is a ___________ defect in the removal, the case must be remanded to state court if ______________________.
procedural
a proper and timely objection is filed.
State court subject matter jurisdiction is governed by ____________.
state law
In state courts, subject matter jurisdiction is designated by ___________ and/or _____________.
type of case
dollar amount
In Texas, state district courts have ______________ over all claims of __________ or more in controversy.
general jurisdiction
$500
Federal courts have ___________ jurisdiction over patent claims. Federal and state court share ___________ jurisdiction over _______________.
exclusive
concurrent
federal civil rights actions
A court has _________ jurisdiction if it is the required forum at the beginning of the case. A court has __________ jurisdiction if it may adjudicate a case only after it has been heard in a lower court.
original
appellate
A Texas state district court has _______ jurisdiction over any dispute involving $500 or more, and _________ jurisdiction over appeals from Texas state agency decisions.
original
appellate
A federal district (trial) court has ________ jurisdiction over appeals from federal administrative agency decisions.
appellate
The United States Supreme Court has __________ jurisdiction over disputes between states.
original
The Rules of Decision Act provides that “the ______________, except where the Constitution or treaties of the United States or Acts of Congress otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as ____________ in civil actions in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.”
laws of the several states
rules of decision
__________ interpreted the Rules of Decision Act to require federal courts to apply the ______________ in cases where state law applied.
Swift v. Tyson
general American common law
________________ reversed Swift v. Tyson, holding that when state law applies in federal court, the federal court must apply _________________________________.
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
the law of the state in which that federal court sits.
_________________ coined the “outcome determinative test,” which provides that the ______ Doctrine mandates state law only where it affects substantive rights that are potentially outcome determinative.
Guaranty Trust v. York
Erie Doctrine
______________ modified the_______________, holding that the court should _______________ in the case to determine which interests were stronger. _____ further held that one factor of the balancing test is whether the state law in question is _____________ outcome determinative. Thus, _______ gives more importance to state laws that absolutely change the outcome of the case.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge outcome determinative test balance state and federal interests Byrd absolutely or definitively Byrd
To determine the content of state law in federal court, the Erie Doctrine directs that the court look to _________ and ____________________. Persuasive (but not binding) authority is found in ______________ and __________________. Erie also allows courts to make an __________________ as to state law.
state statutes decisions from the state's highest court lower state appellate courts federal court opinions on state law educated guess
The Rules Enabling Act (28 U.S.C. § 2072) provides the United States Supreme Court may enact the ___________________________, provided that no rule may _________________ any substantive right.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
abridge, enlarge or modify
The most prominent Rules Enabling case is ________________, which resolves the conflict between the Rules Enabling Act and the ______________.
Hanna v. Plumer
Erie Doctrine
_________ v. Plumer also provides the current version of the ____ Doctrine, holding that if there is no __________________ on point, then apply the Byrd test subject to the __________.
Hanna
Erie
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
twin aims of Erie