Final Exam Test Bank Qs Flashcards
Population growth has been considered a source of pressure on the environment since the 18th century. Consider the work of Thomas Malthus, Garett Hardin, Paul Ehrlich. Summarize both why population growth was seen as a problem, and how each of these scholars thought it could / should be solved.
- Malthus, Harden, and Elrich all thought that the worlds population would one day exceed the Earth’s capacity. (1)
- overcapacity = Malthusian catastrophe where war and famine over lack of resources out destroy society (1)
-Malthus: there ought to be regulations on birth rates to slow the population growth (1) - Elrich: what Malthus said but we should target relatively higher pop growth in developing countries (1)
-Hardin: what they said but birth rate out to be regulated at an individual level – “the right to breed will bring ruin to all” (1)
Explain a global environmental problem that is an example of the Tragedy of the Commons. Your answer must briefly explain what is meant by the Tragedy of the Commons, explain what “the commons” is in your example (and why), how humans degrade the commons in your example, and how this problem evolved over time. Your answer should indicate some proposed solutions to the problem.
- Tragedy of the commons: unregulated access to finite resources will always result in that resource being depleted because individuals will maximize profit and disregard sustainability
- e.g., problem open seas with no fishing regulations = fish are depleted faster than they can reproduce = extinction and no one can utilize the resource anymore
- e.g., As tech increases and more countries send large fishing boats with massive nets, and evolution as the population increase needs more fish to feed them, the degradation happens at a much faster rate
-e.g., solution: regulations on what type of fish (no endangered species), how many (allow them to find breeding partners), and what time of year (avoid breeding seasons) fisheries can catch fish in order to allow fish to reproduce (i.e restore the commons)
How does economic globalization affect the environment? Please make sure your answer addresses both industrialized and developing nations.
- Economic globalization increases global trade which increases the economy (wealth) of both developing and industrialized countries
- How does wealth increase environmental effect: more wealth = more consumption = more pollution
- industrial: industrial agriculture, use of pesticides leads to major biodiversity loss
- Developing: outsourcing factories to developing countries reallocates the pollution to those countries which often do not have the same means of waste disposal as developed countries
How does economic globalization affect poverty and inequality? Please make sure your answer addresses both industrialized and developing nations and provide examples.
-Globalization increases trade btw countries & increased trade = increase economy
- industrial: middle income jobs, ‘low skilled work ‘ such as automobile production outsourced to developing countries for cheaper labour. ‘High skilled’ work e.g., car sales remains in the country = increases economic inequality btw rural and urban areas
- developing: increase economy as more ppl have outsourced jobs, e.g., automobile production in Brazil but there is an economic disparity compared to industrial countries who keep ‘high skilled/high paying jobs’
Globalization has been considered both the source of environmental problems, but also a potential avenue of solution to environmental problems. Explain how globalization can lead to more efficient resource use.
Globalization increases trade between countries. Increased trade is associated with technological development as countries share ideas and resources. Technological development leads to more efficient resource use because innovative ideas that utilize renewable resources are developed and spread faster. Examples of tech innovations that have led to more efficient resource use include things like wind turbines and solar pannels which utilize the earth’s renewable resources (sun and wind) to create energy. Long term, this reduces use on non-renewable resources (fossil fuels like coal and gas). Technological developments are happening all over the world all the time, one new example of a potential innovation that would increase the efficiency of solar energy is a spray on solar ‘panel’ called perovskites which could potentially be applied to any surface to produce energy from the sun!
- Globalization is associated with greater global co-operation. Using the example of the ozone hole, explain how global co-operation can work to solve a global environmental problem.
- The efforts of just one country, no matter how large their economy is often not enough to fix issues
- over half the ozone layer depleted due use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), increasing the risk of sun damage due to increased exposure to solar radiation
-30 countries came together in 1987 and agreed to phase out the use of CFCs to allow the ozone the heal, signed the ‘Montreal protocol. Many countries joined after
-successful because: globalization led to the best minds from all countries working together to solve a problem. Countries hold each other accountable
– wouldn’t have occurred with just one country
-ozone now: healed and not at risk
The Club of Rome’s Limits to Growth warned of global catastrophe. Explain the causes of this impending catastrophe, when it was expected to occur, what the results of this catastrophe would be, and what we should do to avoid it.
- club of Rome proposed that if the world continued to increase pollution, industrialization, and resource depletion unchecked we would incur global catastrophe by early 21st century (2010-2030!)
- catastrophe = sudden collapse in industry and resources resulting in war, famine and mass death
-solution = limiting causes and implementing regulations
What were some key uses of DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) and why was this insecticide ideally suited for birthing the environmental movement?
- what is DDT: insecticide in gardens and fields, also to control viruses spread by insects like malaria (mosquitos) and typhus.
- neg affects of DDT: bioaccumulation of toxins in bald eagles (iconic American sp) and other top predator animals
- worked because: measurable effect with clear cost and effect (bald eagles) made it easy for lay consumer to understand
- birth of environmental movement: increased information to consumers boycotting DDT and increased awareness of other environmental issues
The 1960s US counterculture movement represented a rejection of the dominant system. Explain what this system was, and how the adherents of the counterculture responded to it.
- dominant system, capitalism: consumption, traditional family values, & wars
- youths called ‘hippies’ rejected this by ‘dropping out’ of society and adhering closer to a communist system by not working, communal living, and protesting war, and advocating for environmentalism, rejecting consumption
- hippies advocated to change the system and resulted in more relaxed standards and a public interest in increasing social services, and decreasing the focus on consumption which was prevalent at the time
Provide the IPAT formula, including what each of I,P,A and T stand for. What are our options for reducing overall I? Address each variable in turn, and how we might ethically lower overall impact by decreasing this variable.
- I = P x A x T
I = impact on the Earth
P = population of Earth, large contributor - Cant ethically reduce! Child limits are unethical and don’t work (china evidence)
-infringes on bodily autonomy
-BUT as a country develops its birth rate often declines
A = affluence, the consumption of people - Hard to enforce, people don’t want to give up comfy life and nice things
- But! The average Canadian uses 500,000 KWh of water/year versus 5,000 KWh for the average Pakistani
- Large gap that could potentially be closed
T = technology - the most promising one, no infringing on rights
- clean tech = more efficient resource use and decreased impact
Clean Tech provides opportunities beyond decreasing environmental impact. Explain, using at least two examples, how clean (or cleaner) technology can also improve living conditions in developing countries.
- e.g., 1: India, who burns mostly coal for energy, set a goal for 1/3 of energy to be clean by 2030. As part of this they Switch to clean tech by increasing free electricity in the home in India with solar panels, could spend less time acquiring resources such as firewood for wood stoves and travel to charge things like phones, decreased cost of living, and increased general happiness. Especially in rural areas
- e.g., 2: Columbia public transportation system reform in 2000 increased efficiency on the road. Decreased traffic time and congestion. Provided 1500 jobs for Columbians!
Explain the concept of “techno optimism”. Outline the core argument against techno-optimism.
- techno optimism is the thought that all the worlds problems (e.g., pollution) can be solved by more technological development or more efficient use of our current technology
- Jevons paradox describes the tendency for consumption to increase with increased tech efficiency
- directly opposes techno optimism
-e.g., paradox: car consumption increased from the 1800s as tech increased because increased efficiency = decreased consumer cost.
Food security is about more than just the world producing enough calories to feed everyone. Describe the current state of world food security?
- the world currently produces more than enough food to feed everyone. The WHO suggests each person requires 2,500 Kcals a day and currently all regions produce at least 2,500 kcals in cereals.
- This SHOULD be enough food for everyone but many areas experience the TRIPLE BURDEN OF MALNUTRITION
- triple burden: 1. Over 800 million ppl suffer from malnutrition 2. 2 billion ppl experience over nutrition 3. 2 billion ppl face micronutrient deficiency
Agriculture has become increasingly incorporated into the globalized economic system in recent decades. Explain what is meant by a globalized food system. Outline the positive and negative impacts of a globalized food system for consumers and farmers in both the developed and developing world.
- globalized system = one where every country specializes in a crop and trades it for other crops they do not grow to give their residents a balanced diet instead of every country eating solely the food they grow
- industrial
pro: more output = more profits for farmers (farmer), consumers can add ‘exotic’ food to their diet that they wouldn’t be able to eat without global food trade, e.g., pineapples (comsumer)
Con: Monopolies on crops can increase prices for consumers (consumer) and family farms are often bought out by agrocorporations that can increase efficiency and outpuit (farmer) - developing:
Pro: more efficient tech = more food for people to eat (consumer), larger market = more buyers (farmers)
Con: have less tech than industrial countries so can output less crop (farmers). Monocropping decreases the number of important cultural crops in residents diet (consumer)
What is meant by the technology treadmill in agriculture? Explain the implications of treadmill using some of the examples discussed in class.
- What is technology treadmill: increased agro-tech = increased efficiency = increased output = product is less valuable = farmers make less money = farmers must purchase new tech = increased DEBTS
- example: farmer suicides in India. 1 farmer death every 8 hours due to inescapable debt