Final Exam Extra Flashcards
Hate Speech - Burning Cross
Had to Intended to intimidate + intimidation occurred this is unconstitutional
[Virginia v. Black]
Hate Speech Generally
Protected Viewpoint
Unprotected Categories of Speech
- Incitement to Violence - Lawlessness
- Fighting Words
- Obscenity
- Libel
- Child Porn
Obscenity found in house due to search warrant for something else
Protected
Child Porn Found in a House during search warrant for something else
Unprotected
Obscenity in theater
Can ban - no protection in a theater
“Child” porn - computer generated
protected b/c not real -no children harmed and that is the reason for all bans
Nudity Bans
Can’t restrict on the basis of content
Ex: could have a restriction about drive in movie theater placement screen angle
- Can’t ban ALL Live nude entertainment BUT
- Zoning ordinances = ok b/c it’s to move Not to Ban Sexual speech is treated as lower value speech
Flag Burning
Protected Speech - Symbolic Conduct but not content neutral
Specialty Plates
Gov’t speech Not a public forum - SO - when the gov’t speaks it is not barred by 1st Amend from determining the content of what it says
Terrorist Material Support
It is Expressive Conduct
BUT Not O’Brien but was Strict Scrutiny (compelling gov’t interest and least restrictive)
- it passed the scrutiny and was able to be restricted
Gov’t Power to Limit Speech in Parks + Streets
Can have reasonable time , place, manner restrictions
2 Questions to ask
1) What is the gov't reason for banning ? 2) Is it too restrictive ? a) Look to how restrictive it is b) Are there alternate forms of communication?
Limiting Speech in Public -
can ban - sound trucks, signs on public property, sleeping in public park
can’t ban - leafleting, hand bills door to door, signs on private property
Traditional Public Forum (Streets & Parks)
Must meet strict scrutiny
Designated Public Forum
not traditionally public forum that has been opened up to for that purpose
Must meet strict scrutiny