FINAL EXAM Flashcards
Agency
A legal relationship in which one party (an agent) has the power to act on behalf on another (the principal)
What type of relationship is an agency?
Fiduciary
The agent (the fiduciary of the principal) has a duty to act for the principal’s benefit, arising from the special relationship between them.
Two ways agency issues arise?
- Relationship between the principal and the agent.
- How do we know if they are even in an agency relationship?
- What is the scope of the agent’s authority?
- What duties does the agent owe to the principal?
- What duties does the principal owe to the agent? - Relationship between the agency and some outside person (a “third party”).
- Is the principal required to perform a contract with the third party based on the agent’s agreement to the contract?
- Is the principal liable to the third party in tort or negligence based on what the agent did?
The test for existence of agency is ______ based not on what the principal for agent thought, but on ________________________
objective test
whether their words or other conduct indicate agreement that one person is acting on behalf of the other
An agency relationship does __________ so there is no __________
no need to be contractual
requirement of any consideration
Agent’s 5 duties to principal
- Duty of Loyalty: Agent acts for principal’s benefit – not for agent’s benefit at principal’s expense.
- No Conflicts of interest: self-dealing, working both sides of the deal, competing for principal’s business, accepting a kickback
- Maintain confidentiality even after agency relationship ends - Obey Reasonable instructions
- Act with reasonable care and skill (or high care and skill if that’s what you’ve advertised)
- Duty to Account: Segregate funds and keep good records
- Keep principal Informed of opportunities and risks
Principal’s 5 duties to agent
- Honor Agreements: If principal and agent have an agreement, principal (and agent) should abide by it.
- Compensate agent? Only if agreed (and as agreed)
- Reimburse agent for expenses agent reasonably incurs for principal’s benefit
- Indemnify agent for contract or tort liability agent incurs by acting on principal’s behalf (unless agent was unauthorized or solely at fault)
- Inform agent of known risks.
How is an agent’s authority created? - the two types of authority
- agency law - contract liability of principal*
1. actual express authority - sometimes authority is very clear from works of the principal says or writes to the agent
2. Actual implied authority - principals authorization of the agent is implied from parties conduct or position granted to agent
4 ways How is an agent’s authority created?
- agency law - contract liability of principal
1. actual express authority - sometimes authority is very clear from works of the principal says or writes to the agent
2. Actual implied authority - principals authorization of the agent is implied from parties conduct or position granted to agent - gut check
Test based on questions of fact:
a. Was the agent doing the sort of activity that would be expected of a person in that role?
b. Was the agent doing something that helped accomplish the goals of the agency?
c. Did the principal know about and acquiesce in (not do anything to stop) the agent’s acts?
d. Was the agent acting reasonably in an emergency?
3. Apparent Authority - principal’s conduct/words (or failure to let others know an agent is terminated) lead a third party to reasonably believe that an agent has authority to act for the principal.
4. Ratification - occurs when a principal voluntarily decides to honor an agreement, even though the agent was not authorized to enter the agreement
5 ways Termination of the agency
- Object (goal) of the agency is accomplished or the agreed term of the agency has passed.
- The parties agree to terminate.
- Death of either the principal or the agent
- Changes in the law that make the business of the agency illegal terminate the agency by operation of law
- Either party always has the power to terminate the agency on his own, but not always the right to do so.
Termination of agency - effect on third parties
Apparent Authority of the agent will continue unless the principal gives notice to third parties that the agency has terminated.
- Direct notice by statement or writing to third parties with who have previously dealt with the agent
- Constructive notice (i.e. newspaper, website) to other parties.
Contract Liability of the Agent
Agent’s liability on a contract made for the principal depends on what the third party knows about the principal:
- Disclosed principal (third party knows that the agent is working for a principal, and knows who the principal is) = agent not liable on contract. [normal situation]
- If agent does not disclose identity or fact of the principal to the third party, or if the principal does not exist at the time the deal is made, then..
AGENT is personally liable.
2 ways a principal may be liable for an agents tort
- tort liability - principals
1. Respondeat Superior - only for employee/employer relationships, NOT independent contractor relationships
2. Direct liability - applied to both employees and non-employee agents
Respondeat Superior
Employer liable when employee commits tort within the scope of the employment.
The employee, in addition to the employer, may be liable to the third party.
The doctrine does not apply to non-employee agents
Direct Liability
tort liability - principals liability
This is much narrower scope of liability than respondeat superior, and applies to both employee and non-employee agents.
Principal is directly liable for agent’s tort if the principal authorized the tortious conduct.
Negligent hiring or negligent supervision: Principal will be directly liable if principal was negligent in hiring /supervising agent.
If the agency relationship is an employee relationship, then the employer has more obligations re benefit expenses, regulations that apply to employees, etc.
Employee or independent contractor?
Nearly all employees are agents of their employer
Independent contractors are someone who is hired to undertake a contractually defined result and is not an employee of the principal but is sometimes an agent (like a realtor or lawyer)
Employee versus Non-employee Agents
Principal’s right to control the manner and means of the agent’s performance;
Skill required
Source of tools
Location of the work
Duration of the relationship
Principal’s right to assign additional projects to the agent
Agent’s discretion over when and how long to work
Method of payment
Agent’s role in hiring and paying assistants
Whether the work performed by the agent is part of the regular business of the principal
Whether the principal is a business
Tax treatment of the hiring party
*justin and janet
As a general rule is an agent liable for their own torts?
Tort liability - agent
yes
Joint and several liability and indemnification in agent tort liabillity
Both the agent and the principal may be liable to the third party for the same tort –
Agent is not absolved from liability to a third party just because she acted at the direction of the principal.
But the principal may have to indemnify the agent for torts committed in the course of performing her duties, if she was not acting beyond the scope of her authority.
The injured party will only recover once, but can recover from either the agent or the principal or some combination.
Who is liable for agents tortious conduct if the agent is an employee?
Was employee acting within the scope of her employment?
If YES: Principal liable (respondeat superior). Agent also liable, but may be entitled to reimbursement from principle.
Did the principal authorize the tortious conduct?
YES: Principal may also be directly liable for the tort. (principal may be both directly liable and liable under respondeat superior) Agent is also liable but may be entitled to reimbursement from P.
Was the principal’s own conduct negligent in some way (hiring, supervising)?
YES: Principal directly liable for negligence. Agent also liable (unless had no reason to know of defective tools).
Who is liable for agents tortious conduct if the agent isn’t an employee?
Did Principal actually authorize the agent to commit the tortious conduct?
If YES – Principal directly liable.
Was the principal’s own conduct negligent in some way (hiring, improper instructions, failure to discharge, etc.)?
If YES – Principal directly liable for her own negligence.
If No to both of the above, the principal is not liable for a non-employee agent’s tort.
Why forms of business matter
Creation Continuity Control Liability Taxation
4 Basic Forms of businesses
- sole proprietorship
- partnership - LLP
- Corporation - C corp, S Corp
- LLC
Sole Proprietorship
A sole proprietorship has only one owner. The business is just an extension of its owner.
It is not a legal entity and cannot sue or be sued, so creditors/claimants sue the owner directly. Often is the form of business just by default – the owner simply opened the business and started operating.
Advantages
no formalities,
owner takes all profit and control,
not taxed as business before flowing through to proprietor
Disadvantage:
owner bears all risk of loss
Organization cannot continue past the owner’s life
Not amenable to outside investor/outside ownership
Partnership
Objective test for determining whether partnership exists:
Two or more people who
Have a common interest in business
And share profits and losses.
A partnership may be created without the people in it intending to create one
Consequences of General Partnership:
The default arrangement by law is that partners share profits and losses equally. AND
Partners in a general partnership are individually (personally) liable for the torts of the partnership (torts committed within the scope of the business).
A partnership is a legal entity (can sue and be sued, though in a general partnership the partner are still individually liable)…
…but not a federal tax-paying entity
Advantages: relatively easy to create individual taxation partners control the business flexible structure without a lot of formality
Disadvantages:
sometimes too easy to create (can form general partnership by default)
general partners bear all risk of loss jointly and severally.
LLP
As a partner in an LLP, you do not have personal liability for the LLP’s torts.
You do, however, have unlimited liability for your own wrongful acts.
Eliminates the problem of a partner being on the hook for his partner’s malpractice.
Often used by professionals (e.g. lawyers, auditors)
LLPs can elect to be taxed either like a partnership or like a corporation.