Final Exam Flashcards
Requirements for judicial review:
- Rule exceeds scope
- Violates constitutional rights
- Rule applied in arbitrary fashion
- Violates public policy
- Organization breaks its own rule
Standing
P’s right to bring complaint
Standing Requirements
- Plaintiff must have sustained injury
- Court must possess power to grant a remedy for interest which plaintiff seeks protection
- Plaintiff must have interest in outcome of case
Injunctive Relief
• Action by court to prevent future wrongs
• Prevents irreparable injury:
o risk of physical harm or death
o loss of special opportunity
o deprivation of unique, irreplaceable property
Temporary restraining order
- emergency situations without notice to D
* generally lasts for 10 days
Preliminary injunction
- granted prior to trial on merits of legal action
* D is given notice & opportunity to appear at hearing
Preliminary injunction requirements:
- P will face irreparable harm
- Money damages are inadequate
- P can prove the balance of hardships favors him/her
- P possesses likelihood of success in case based upon merits
Permanent injunction
- awarded as remedy following trial
* remains in force indefinitely
State Action
- An entity that conducts activities that have such a close connection to the state that the entity may be considered to be an extension of the state itself.
- Constitutional claims are only appropriate when a state actor is involved
Due Process
An expected course of legal proceedings established in U. S. system of jurisprudence for the protection and enforcement of private rights.
• Starting point is state action
• What right has been deprived?
• Life, liberty or property interests
How was their due process right violated?
Substantive Due Process
Requires the rule or regulation to be fair and reasonable in application as well as content.
Inquiry Asks Two Questions:
- Does the Rule or Regulation Have a Proper Purpose?
- Does the Rule or Regulation Clearly Relate to the Accomplishment of That Purpose?
Procedural Due Process
Examines the decision-making process that is followed in determining whether a rule or regulation has been violated and what sanction should be imposed.
In order to provide fairness, the court says that the greater the depreciation, the greater procedural due process that is owed to the plaintiff.
Equal Protection
• No state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
• Involves state action engaged in purposeful, rather than unintentional, discrimination
To determine if an alleged discriminatory practice is “constitutionally permissible” the court looks one of two areas:
Fundamental rights
Classification of people - The class affected by the rule or practice determines the standard of review used by the court
Discrimination by classification
• Strict scrutiny - classifications based on race, ethnicity, national origin
Is law necessary to achieve compelling governmental interest
• Intermediate scrutiny - classifications based on gender & legitimacy of birth
Is law substantially related to important government interest
• Rational basis review - lowest level applied to all group classifications not historically associated with discrimination
Is law reasonably related to a legitimate government interest
U. S. Constitution, Fourth Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. • Starting point is state action • Is the conduct a search? • Is search reasonable? o Probable cause
Is the Conduct a Search?
• U. S. Supreme Court has held that the collection and testing of urine constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.
Key question: Is the search reasonable?
- Was search justified at its inception? (i.e., Was there reasonable suspicion)
- Was search reasonable in its scope? (i.e., Degree of intrusion on individual’s privacy v. Government’s interest in testing)
What is risk management and why should sport managers engage in risk management?
o Formal process of assessing exposure to risk
o Taking appropriate action to minimize the impact of risk
o Controlling financial and personal injury losses from sudden, unforeseen, unusual accidents and intentional torts.
o Management strategy to maintain greater control over the legal uncertainty that may wreak havoc on on a RLS enterprise.
o A proactive plan shows… intent evidence of intent to act responsibly.
• What are the steps you should take in developing a risk management plan? (i.e., DIM process)
o DIM • Developing the risk management plan o Identification risks • Negligent public liability Risk of bodily injury Failure to supervise Instruct or properly train employees • Non-negligent public liability Discrimination Products liability Contractual liability Employee actions Sexual harassment • Property loss Owned/leased property and equimpemnt: • Fire • Floods • Theft • Vandalism • Business operations Financial losses due to personnel and non-personnel related risks