Final Exam Flashcards
goal of prescriptive formulas
- achieve amplification settings that are appropriate for the patient
- objective:
- –generate a target for gain or output as a function of frequency and intensity
- with the prescriptive approach , anyone can replicate your recommendation anywhere
two times prescriptive formulas can be used
- during selection
* during verification of hearing aid output
considerations for choosing a fitting strategy
- amount of audiometric and related information
- availability of age-specific corrections
- flexibility in selection of transducer type
- resulting targets:
- –REIG
- –REAR
- –OSPL90
- –coupler gain
- –output in the coupler
- –other HA parameters
how are targets for HAs devised?
- computer-based fitting software
- –stand-alone computer programs
- –software programs provided by manufacturer
- –formulae included in real-ear gain analyzers
how are fitting strategies and prescriptive formulas characterized?
- type of gain application
- –linear or nonlinear gain application
- amount and type of audiometric information required
- –only thresholds, loudness scaling data, or both
- underlying theoretical rationale
- –loudness normalization
- –loudness equalization
linear prescriptive formulas
- only prescribes 1 target per frequency
* targets are used to amplify conversational speech and bring it to the level of the listener’s MCL
compression based prescriptive formulas
- provides more than 1 target per frequency
* establishes ideal gain targets for various intensity inputs
two different types of formulas that require two different types of audio info
- threshold-based formulas
- –pure tone audio only
- loudness based formulas
- –audio thresholds plus measured MCL, UCL, and/or loudness scale data
what are the two underlying theoretical rationales for prescriptive formulas?
- loudness normalization
* loudness equalization
what is the goal and assumption behind loudness normalization
- Goals: restore normal loudness across the frequency bands
* based on the assumption that restoration of normal loudness perception will lead to greater acceptance by the user
what is the goal and assumption behind loudness equalization
- goal: achieve equal loudness across frequency bands
* patient perceives all frequency bands with equal loudness
what are the 5 linear formulas for loudness equalization
- Half-gain rule
- berger
- POGO
- NAL-R
- libby 1/3
what are the 2 nonlinear formulas for loudness equalization
- NAL-NL1; NAL-NL2
* DSL
what is the linear formula for loudness normalization
DSL
what are the 4 nonlinear formulas for loudness normalization
- LGOB
- IHAFF
- FIG 6
- DSL
what are the linear prescriptive strategies
- 1 target per frequency
- –same gain-frequency curves for all input levels
- —-until output level is high enough to limit (OLC)
- similar reserve gain recommendations across strategies
- similar in prescription of reduced low-frequency gain
- –to help reduce upward spread of masking from LF ambient noise
lybarger’s half-gain rule
linear
*prescribed gain is 1/2 the amount of the HL
Berger’s half-gain rule
linear
- 1/2 gain at most frequencies
- more than 1/2 gain at 1000 and 2000
prescription of gain and output (POGO)
linear
- 1/2 gain with additional low cuts
- for losses up to 80dB HL
POGO II
linear
- severe to profound losses
- gain increased by 1dB for every 1dB increase in HL
libby one-third gain rule
linear
- gain prescribed is 1/3 of the HL
- less gain at low frequencies
national acoustics laboratory- revised (NAL-R)
linear
*slightly less than 1/2 gain is prescribed
NAL-RP
linear
- revised; profound
- less high frequency emphasis at 2 kHz as threshold increases beyond 90dB HL
desired sensation level (DSL)
linear
- mild to severe losses; targets are 1 SD below the pt’s estimated MCL
- profound losses; based on experimentally optimal sensation levels
what is the nonlinear fitting strategy
- compression-based fitting methods
- –provide more than 1 target/frequency
loudness growth at half-octave bands (LGOB
- nonlinear prescriptive strategy
- goal: loudness normalization
- HI pt categorizes loudness of NBN using a 7-pt likert scale
- for each input level, gain needed to normalize loudness is deduced
IHAFF
- nonlinear prescriptive strategy
- independent hearing aid fitting forum
- goal: loudness normalization
- use contour loudness scale
VIOLA
*nonlinear prescriptive strategy
visual input-output locator algorithms
FIG 6
- nonlinear prescriptive strategy
- goal: loudness normalization
- requires only audiometric thresholds
- prescribes insertion and coupler gain for:
- –soft
- –conversational
- –loud input levels
DSL [i/o]
- desired sensation level [input/output]
- nonlinear prescriptive strategy
- goal: prescribe the appropriate amount of gain so that all acoustic signals fall within the pt’s DR
- originally designed to meet the needs of the pediatric hearing aid population
the two alternative approaches of DSL
- DSL linear
- –loudness equalization
- DSL curvilinear
- –loudness normalization
DSL [i/o] (version 4)
nonlinear prescriptive strategy
*curvilinear procedure became dominant method
DSL [i/o] (version 5)
- nonlinear prescriptive strategies
- CT increased based on the level of HL
- gain reduction with low-level noise (ie, expansion)
- consideration of loudness summation for OSPL90 prescription
- gain increase for conductive HL
- lower for adult
DSL prescriptive strategies in general
- used with kids most often
- –specify more information than with other strategies
- –more high and low frequency gain than other fitting methods
- –lower OPSL90 targets
NAL-NL1 and NAL-NL2
- nonlinear prescriptive strategies
- extension o NAL-R linear fitting strategy
- goal: maximize speech intelligibility
- used most often with adult patients
NAL-NL2
- nonlinear prescriptive strategies
- came out in 2010
- males are prescribed slightly more gain than females
- increases or decreases gain based on HA experience level
- gain for children is adjusted 5 dB higher at mid-level inputs compared to gain for adults; more than 5dB higher at low level inputs; less than 5dB higher at high level inputs
- bilateral fittings are prescribed less gain than unilateral fittings
- can select tonal or non-tonal languages
CAMEQ2
- nonlinear prescriptiVe strategy
- now called CAM2
- earlier versions
- –cambridge loudness equalization (CAMEQ)
- –cambridge restoration of loudness (CAMREST)
- loudness equalization approach
- attempts to limit the total loudness to be= that perceived by a normal hearing listener to the same sound
- predicts from the threshold the amount of gain needed
prescribing compression thresholds
- lower CT results in higher gain for low intensity sounds
* around 60 dB SPL
prescribing OSPL90
- most effective method for prescribing OSPL90
- measure UCLs (LDLs) at specific frequencies
- use prescriptive formulas to determine appropriate OSPL90s
what is testing of electroacoustic performance
*measure of the output HA with inputs of various frequencies and intensities