Final Exam Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Strict Scrutiny Rule

A

Statute must be narrowly tailored to satisfy a compelling government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rational Basis Test

A

Statute must be reasonably and rationally related to a legitimate government interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Vagueness

A

Leaves enforcer with unbridled discretion which causes issues with due process as to whether there was actual notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Overbreadth

A

Statute prohibits protected and unprotected speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Overbreadth 3rd person Exception

A

Can have someone whose speech that is not protected bring a suit for people whose speech would be protected had they brought a suit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Prior Restraint

A

Government Speech that preceded the speech itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Prior Restraint and Permits Scheme Test

A

1) State must have explicit criteria for the grant or denial of the permit; and
2) The criteria must be content neutral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-Topical Speech

A

Timing is not critical to the speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Non-Topical Speech Test

A

1) The government must show the speech is not protected
2) Quick determinations by the court
3) The government must be prompt to initiate court action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Topical Speech

A

Timing is critical to the speech and must be a court determination before the government can restrain publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Clear and Present Danger Test

A

Brandenburg Test

1) Direct incitement to (Hand)
2) Lawless conduct, that is
3) Imminent, and (Present)
4) Likely to occur (Clear)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conduct as “Speech”

A

If a person gives material support to a terror organization, it is a form of unprotected speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defamation- Public Official/Figure

A

1) Speaker must have knowledge that the statement is false; and
2) act with reckless disregard for whether the statement was false or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defamation- Private Individual

A

1) The statement made is false; and

2) The speaker acted negligently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Obscenity

A

Miller Test

1) Prurient Interest
2) Patently Offensive
3) Artistic Value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Obscenity (1)

A

Prurient (Indecent) Interest-

Whether the average person would subjectively find the work appeals to a prurient interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Obscenity (2)

A

Patently Offensive-

Whether the work depicts or describes sexual conduct as defined by the applicable state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Obscenity (3)

A

Artistic Value-

Whether the work lacks artistic, scientific, or political value

19
Q

Child Pornography

A

Automatically unprotected, but must actually involve children

20
Q

Fighting Words

A

Unprotected speech where words are directed at a specific person or group and by their very utterance inflict injury or tent to incite an immediate breach of the peace

21
Q

True Threats

A

Speaker means to communicate a serious act of unlawful violence towards a particular person or group

22
Q

View Point Discrimination

A

Law which bars speech for only certain classes of individuals will always be met with strict scrutiny

23
Q

Commercial Speech

A

Intermediate Scrutiny-
Speech Related Solely to the economic speaker and its audience or speech proposing a commercial transaction (first two prongs of test = easier to prove)

24
Q

Commercial Speech Test

A

Central Hudson Test

1) Whether the expression is protected under the First Amendment (is it lawful)
2) Whether the asserted government interest is substantial
3) Whether the regulation directly advances the government interest asserred
4) Whether the restriction is no more extensive than necessary to secure that interest

25
Q

Content Neutral Restriction on Speech

A

Cannot have time, manner, or place, restrictions within the statute (not as difficult to meet)

26
Q

Content Neutral Restriction on Speech Test

A

Frisby Test

1) Is the restriction truly content neutral
2) Is there a significant government interest
3) Id the restriction narrowly tailored to serve the government interest
4) Does the restriction leave ample alternative channels for communication

27
Q

Traditional Public Forum

A

Very limited government property: public streets, sidewalks, parks (same type of analysis as before)

28
Q

Designated Public Forum

A

Government property opened intentionally and for general use (same type of analysis as before)

29
Q

Private Property

A

Given the highest level of protection

30
Q

Limited / Non-traditional Public Forum

A

Government intentionally opens for use by certain speakers of certain subject matter

31
Q

Limited / Non-traditional Public Forum Test

A

Government may ban even protected speech as long as the ban is:

1) reasonable; and
2) viewpoint neutral

32
Q

Viewpoint Neutral

A

If the speech being excluded is different in king from the speech that is being allowed, it is not viewpoint discrimination

33
Q

Government as a Speaker

A

The First Amendment does not apply, and, therefore, government speech can also be viewpoint discrimination

34
Q

Speech in Schools

A

Tinker- Strict Scrutiny

But Tinker is applied inconsistently so if the speech appears to be grossly “obscene” then it could be rational basis

35
Q

Establishment Clause

A

Congress may not pass a law that established religion

36
Q

Establishment Clause Main Test

A

Lemon Test:

1) The statute must have a secular purpose which cannot be pretextual
2) The statute’s principal/primary purpose can neither advance nor inhibit religion
3) Cannot have excessive government entanglement with religion

37
Q

Other factors in the Establishment Clause

A

1) Endorsement Test
2) Coercion Test
3) Passive Monuments

38
Q

Endorsement Test

A

Issues where a reasonable person would perceive the forms of speech as being sponsored by the government

39
Q

Coercion Test

A

Whether or not the religious item coerces the viewer into adopting or following a particular religion

40
Q

Passive Monuments

A

Lemon Test is not applicable

41
Q

Passive Monument Factors

A

1) Can the monument be easily avoided
2) If the monument has a duel significance
3) If the monument is indoctrinating an impressionable young person
4) If the monument was donated by a private indivdual

42
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

Congress may not interfere with the free exercise of religion

43
Q

Free Exercise Clause Test

A

Oregon v. Smith

1) Law targeting religion on its face is Strict Scrutiny
2) A generally applicable law with incidental impact on religious beliefs is Rational Basis (but if the law also incites another First Amendment Protection, could get heightened scrutiny)