Final Exam Flashcards

1
Q

Shirlaw v Southern Foundries

Implied terms in contract

A

Officious bystander test - so obvious it goes without saying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

BP Refinery v Shire of Hastings

Implied terms in contract

A

Composite test - 5 conditions to be satisfied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Provost Developments v Collingwood Towers

Conditions affecting formation

A

“Subject to solicitors approval” = Binding condition, not pre-requisite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Connor v Pakerau Store

Conditions affecting formation

A

“Subject to finance” - must make reasonable efforts to fulfill condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking

Exemption Clauses

A

Notice of exemption must be given at time of contracting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Burnett v Westminster Bank

Exemption Clauses

A

Constructive notice must be given in a way plaintiff would expect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Livingstone v Roskilly

Exemption Clauses

A

Ambiguous notice = not effective/adequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

King v Wilkinson

Mistakes

A

Unilateral mistake - one party one mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ware v Johnson

Mistakes

A

Common mistake - both parties same mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Conlon v Ozolins

Mistakes

A

Mutual mistake - both parties different mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Herbert Morris v Saxelby

Contracts in Restraint of Trade

A

‘Secrets’ no more than general skills and knowledge that anyone would acquire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Brown v Brown

Vendor Contracts

A

Length of restraint must be justified and reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bisset v Wilkinson

Misrepresentation

A

Must be false statement of fact not merely opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dimmock v Hallett

Puff

A

Mere puff does not constitute misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

March Construction v CCC

Silence

A

Silence does not constitute misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Wakelin v RH & EA Jackson

Distortion of Positive Representation

A

Where silence constitutes a failure to make full disclosure, what is left unsaid constitutes misrepresentation

17
Q

Starlight Enterprises v Lapco Enterprises

Cancellation for Repudiation

A

No repudiation if willingness to continue contract demonstrated

18
Q

Hochster v De La Tour

Anticipatory Repudiation

A

Clear intention not to perform contract communicated

19
Q

Mana Property Trustee v James Development

Anticipatory Repudiation

A

Steps taken to ensure compliance removes claim of repudiation

20
Q

Westpac Merchant Finance v Winstone Industries

Affirmation

A

Right to cancel lost if contract affirmed with full knowledge of repudiation

21
Q

Walton Harvey v Walker & Homfrays

Frustration

A

Will not succeed where:

Frustrating event should have been foreseen

22
Q

Davis Contractors v Fareham Urban District Council

Frustration

A

Will not succeed where:

Contract is merely delayed or interrupted

23
Q

Krell v Henry

Futility

A

Performance futile because mutually understood underlying purpose of contract can no longer be achieved

24
Q

Hadley v Baxendale

Damages

A

Damages cannot be too remote

2 Limbs

25
Q

Redpath Industries v Cisco

Damages

A

Must be mitigated

26
Q

Ruxley Electronics & Construction v Forsyth

Damages

A

Cost of rectification not to outweigh benefit received

27
Q

Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon

Damages

A

Damages awarded if fruit of contract not provided