Final Exam Flashcards
Rational Model
assumes complete logic in decision making
Alternate Models
due to various constraints, many decisions in orgs are not purely rational
Organizational decision makers
characterized by bounded rationality - attempt to make logical decisions, but cognitively limited (by time + resources)
Nutt’s Normative Model
Formulation Concept Development Detailing Evaluation Implementation
Formulation
define the problem; needs assessment (Ex. Michael sees there’s a surplus)
Concept development
ideas generated (Ex. generate ways to spend money)
Detailing
gather info/research from subgroups (Ex. Michael brings in Hank)
Evaluation
judge cost/benefit - scrutiny (chairs verses copier)
Implementation
Launch (they buy chairs)
Optimal decision
the goal of Nutt’s normative model
shortcomings of Nutt’s model
- Few use all stages
- Don’t want to reinvent the wheel
- Don’t consider rationale for decision (why/how?)
- Often make hasty implementation w/o identifying other possibilities
- concept development is overlooked
March & Simon “Satisficing)
optimizing, bounded rationality - finding the single best solution to an org problem
analogical
in decision making, an intuitive process that is neither logical or illogical - going off past experience
How did your experience in the Bomb Shelter activity bear on these models of organizational decision making?
→ Most people satisficed, we didn’t approach it rationally. There is no right or wrong answer, it point to the fact that even though we may try to optimize, sometimes it isn’t possible.
What is groupthink?
“a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ‘ striving for unanimity overrides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action”.
What are characteristics of groupthink?
Illusion of invulnerability, illusion of morality, Stereotyping, self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, direct pressure on dissidents, reliance on self-appointed mindguards
illusion of invulnerability
nothing can go wrong within the group
Illusion of morality
the virtues of the group are beyond reproach
stereotyping
categorizing others outside the group in ways that see their views as unacceptable
self-censorship
overt restraint of a group member offering opinions counter to the prevailing thought in the group
illusion of unanimity
statement of group agreement while private doubts and disagreements are suppressed