Final Exam Flashcards
Paleolithic period describes
Appearance of stone tools (stone age)
Lithic tool ages (oldest to youngest)
Olduwan
Achulean
Mousterian
Cerebral rubicon
Threshold established by Keith at 750cc designations what species can be placed into genus homo
Homo habilis
- Handy Man
- Appeared in E. Africa around 2 MYA
- Olduvai gorge & Turkana basin
- highly fragmentary materials
Oldowan tools (3 types)
Hammer stones- show percussion damage, smash into other rocks
Stone cores- sharp edge on one side
Stone flakes- flakes off stone cores for fine cutting
Oldowan appear before/after first known homo habilis remains
Before
Cranial dental differences different from austalopiths to Homo (OH 24 “twiggy”)
Similar incisors & canines Reduced molars & premolars M3 smaller than M2 No sagittal crests Slight post-orbital constriction
_____ first appears in H. Habilis
Modern shape to dental arcade (parabola)
AL 666-1
Post cranial traits of homo habilis
- Robust hand bones, BUT also fine gripping capability
- stout, adducted big toe
- some climbing
Leakey revised cerebral rubicon
Bipedality
Upper limb shorter than lower limb
Grasping thumb
600-1600 cc brain
Leakeys
- Olduvai discoveries- KNM-ER 1470 (1972)
- Established human evolutionary development in Africa
Homo rudolfensis (5) (as opposed to homo habilis)
- Larger flatter face
- larger brain (775 cc)
- larger molars + premolars
- trend toward modern human (except teeth)
- KNM-ER 1470
Homo rudolfensis (5)
- Larger flatter face
- larger brain (775 cc)
- larger molars & premolars
- trend toward modern human (except teeth)
- KNM-ER 1470
Single species hypothesis
- Brace & wolpoff
- super lumpers
- Human & close ancestors = comprehensive niche, only 1 species can exist at a time
- all variations in fossils from same period = intraspecific variation
Lumpers
Fewer species, intraspecific variation
Splitters
More species, interspecific variations
Evidence against single species hypothesis
More than 100cc difference in brain size
H rudolfensis = more gracile facial features
Interpretations of homo rudolfensis & homo habilis based on facts
KNM ER 1470 = homo rudolfensis, separate species
Homo habilis = ancestor of modern humans
What features distinguish the genus homo from other homini? (3)
- Encephalization
- Tool use
- Reduced dentition and facial features
Adaptability
Ontogenetic adaptation
Developmental change over lifetime/childhood
Acclimatization
Plastic physiological change over minutes/hrs/weeks in response to environment
adaptation
Microevolutionary adaptation
Genetic change over generations, evolution
Adaptability
Ontogenetic adaptation
Developmental change over lifetime/childhood
Acclimatization
Plastic physiological change over minutes/hrs/weeks
Behavioral/cultural adaptation
Decisions
Unconstrained
Bergmann’s rule
increase/decrease SA by changing volume
Smaller animals need more energy and diffuse more heat due to increase SA to volume ratio
Allen’s Rule
increase/decrease SA by changing proportions (ex: more elongated body)
Sickle cell anemia protects against
Malaria
Lactose intolerance
Lack lactase enzyme that allow us to digest lactose, lactase persistent allele= autosomal dominant
3 main types of evidence of change in early homo lineage
“Homo erectus”
Anatomical changes
Geographic distribution
Evidence of culture
Cranial traits of homo erectus
Thick cranial bones Large brow ridge Long low skull Cranium wider at base Sagittal keel 700-1250 cc brain
Post cranial traits of homo erectus
- Taller than early homo, height within modern human range
- > 100lb in weight
- sexual dimorphism
- robust heavily built frame
Homo erectus geographical location
Africa
Georgia
Asia
Western Europe
ER 3733
Oldest H erectus fossil from Africa
1.7mya old
Found at East Lake Turkana
WT 15000
Most complete H erectus specimen found
Nariokotome boy (Nariokotome, Kenya in E Africa)
Juvenile
Dmanisi
Earliest known Homo (homini) outside Africa
1.8-1.7mya
Used olduwan tools
Dmanisi cranial traits (similarities and differences from H erectus)
Similar to H erectus: low braincase, wide base, sagittal keeling
Different from H erectus: smaller cranial capacity, less robust & thinner browridge, projecting lower face, relatively large canine
Dmanisi post cranial traits
Not tall, 4’9” to 5’5”
Body proportions similar to H erectus and H sapiens
Zhoukoudian remains
Cave site in China Remains of >40 adults and children .7-.4 mya (recent) Site occupied for ~250,000 yrs Large browridges, sagittal keel, nuchal torus Thick skull bones Protruding face, broad near bottom
Atapuerca site
Large amount of material Earliest material resemble Dmanisi, later individuals = H heidelbergenesis? Sophisticated stone tools Cut marks on animal bones Long occupation
Earliest material from
Africa
Anatomical change of H erectus associated with behaviors related to emigration from Africa and appearance
Evidence of culture in H erectus
Tool use (olduwan --> achulean) Hunting? Controlled fire? Clothing? Social structure (groups, sexual dimorphism)
Acheulian technology
Developed ~1.4mya
Handaxe or biface
Raw materials transported long distances
Butchering meat evident (doesn’t necessarily mean hunting)
Significant part of diet = plant materials
Reconstructing of zhoukoudian cave site behavior is based on
Homo erectus bone = habitation
High density of animal bones = diet
Ash layer = controlled fire + cooking
Evidence of Zhoukoudian cave site as hyena den
Homo erectus bones = hyena prey
Animal bone in high density = other prey (including hyena) lived there
Ash layer = natural organic deposits
African vs Asian homo erectus
African = thinner skull bones –> homo ergaster
Too big for H habilis
Too derived for H rudolfensis
Too generalized for H erectus
pliocene vs pleistocene homini
pliocene = homo habilis/rudolfensis pleistocene = everything else (homo erectus --> neanderthals/modern human)