FINAL EXAM! Flashcards
What is the first step in the assessment and evaluation process?
The assessment and evaluation process begins in the general education arena. Before a student may be referred, the public school must document that all general education options have been attempted and that the student is still not successful in the general education curriculum.
The initial referral for special education - parents must be provided with a notice of the referral beforehand
Assessment - The IEP team collects the assessment data and reviews the existing assessments and determines the need for further assessments (parent permission is required before new assessments are given) - If no new assessments are needed parents must be notified of the team IEP meeting
Evaluation - Parental consent must be provided before an evaluation is conducted, IEP team evaluates the assessment data
What is the responsibility of the SLP if the parents or legal guardians refuse to give permission to evaluate?
SLP should
-document attempts to contact/inform parents and of their refusal
-inform parents of their rights, potential consequences etc
-utilize due process or mediation if necessary
-look for alternative measures to assist the child
-overall can’t proceed without consent
If the parent refuses to provide consent, the local education agency may pursue an initial evaluation with the procedures described in section 615.
If the parent fails to provide consent for the child to receive special services, the local education agency is not required to convene an IEP meeting.
What is the definition of assessment?
The collection of data from a variety of sources (file review, case history, parent interview, classroom observation, teacher interview, standardized test results, authentic assessment results)
What is the definition of evaluation?
The review and interpretation of the assessment data by the multidisciplinary team to determine if there is a disability resulting in a handicapping condition that warrants special education and/or support services (also requires use of clinical judgement)
What must be included in the PLEFP statement?
Strengths, interests, and learning styles.
Challenges/needs.
How the challenges adversely affect educational, social, and functional performance and progress in the general education curriculum.
Based on evaluation results. Needs must be written in observable, measurable terms and show baseline performance.
How do the baseline data reported in the PLAAFP relate to the IEP goal?
Each need that is identified in the PLAAFP must be translated into goals on the IEP.
How has the writing of IEP goals changed over time?
Before 1990 – Goals were written in general terms and used nonspecific language such as improve, enhance, or develop – Objectives were used instead of benchmarks – 2 objectives written for each goal – each objective contained a condition, target behavior, and criteria – no baseline included, no direction of behavior was required, the accountability for the criteria was nonspecific (based on teacher-made test, classroom observation, parent report)
IDEA 1997 – more emphasis on least restrictive environment – IEP goals had to be curriculum based and reflect the LRE – benchmarks were allowed instead of objectives because the goal had to relate to education standards delineated by each state – IEP goals had to include a direction of behavior (increase, decrease, maintain), goals had to include baseline data taken from the PLAAFP – goals had to include criteria that were observable and measurable – benchmarks had to be written in observable and measurable terms
IDEA 2024 – does not require benchmarks or objectives to be written on the IEP
When does an IEP goal written after IDEIA 2004 have to include benchmarks and objectives?
If the student does not participate in statewide or districtwide assessment programs
What are the important parts of a well written goal?
Goals must connect to the general education curriculum
Time frame – the length of time it will take the student to achieve the goal (must not exceed on academic year)
Condition – the modifications and accommodations that will be made to help the student become successful
Direction of behavior – whether the child will increase, decrease, or maintain a specific behavior
Target behavior – what the student is expected to achieve
Baseline – the student’s demonstrated skills documented in the evaluation of assessment data
Criteria – how much progress the student is expected to achieve within the designated time frame
Setting – describes the least restrictive environment that is appropriate for the individual student
Why is it important to avoid professional jargon when writing goals?
The SLPs do not write IEPs alone. They must collaborate with others and make sure that IEPs are written in transparent, easy-to-understand language. The IEP must be understood by all IEP team members.
Team = parents, one general education teacher (must be currently involved in student’s education, one special education teacher, LEA representative who is qualified to supervise, the student (when appropriate), a person who interprets the instructional implications of evaluation results, other people related to parents or LEA personnel
What are the advantages of the traditional pull-out intervention approach?
Isolated, structured environment – reduces background noise and interruptions
Individualized instruction – therapy can be tailored to the individual child’s learning pace
Progress monitoring – easier to track progress in a controlled setting – leading to more appropriate adjustment of goals
Reduce anxiety – feel less pressure to perform in front of their peers and feel more comfortable practicing their skills
What are the disadvantages of the traditional pull-out intervention approach?
It disrupts the child’s class time – child is missing instructional time from their teacher, could impact the child’s academic performance and engagement in the classroom
Missing out on social interactions with their peers in the classroom
Can feel isolating to the student making them feel different from their peers
Could hinder generalization of skills to the classroom as child is not practicing skills in their classroom environment
How are the self-contained classroom model and the resource room model alike?
SLP is in charge
Self-contained – SLP serves as specialized teacher and is responsible for total curriculum
Resource – SLP provides individual intervention, group intervention, or group
Promote IEPs and targeted intervention
How are the self-contained classroom model and the resource room model different?
Self- contained differences:
Use widely in early childhood and elementary level
Focus on therapy for speech sound disorders – phonology, Hodson cycles approach
Always in the self-contained class with other students with special needs
Resource room differences:
Used widely at the middle school level (can be implemented in elementary and high school)
Focus on general education/using IEP goals to complete general education assignments
Middle school/high school – can receive course credit if curriculum-based goals are achieved
In general education class, leave for one or two periods (pull-out format)
Describe when it would be most advantageous to use a consultation service delivery model
When the goal is to empower other professionals or caregivers to directly implement interventions, to supplement providing minimal direct treatment yourself, and incorporate IEP goals into daily living being embraced by all parties.
Good for early childhood programs/early intervention – may be home-based or day-care based intervention
SLP trains other educators or parents in how to implement the plan
Create a continuum that reflects the most restrictive environment to the least restrictive environment. Place the following intervention approaches along that continuum: self-contained, teaming for reading, resource room, team teaching, cooperative learning, RtI (response to intervention), and consultation model.
MOST // Self-contained, resource room, team teaching, teaming for reading, cooperative learning, RtI, consultation model // LEAST
What are the advantages of a teaming for reading approach to intervention?
Collaboration – SLPs team with other educators to support the literacy development of students
Individualized plans/targets for the student through collaboration – intervention integrates both spoken and written modalities of language – collaborating with various professionals who have expertise in the development of reading
Prevent future reading difficulties (early identification of students at risk for reading difficulties)
Team (using their strengths) = SLP, reading specialist, learning disabilities teacher, OT, educational assistant
SLP – phonological awareness, story grammar, vocabulary building, comprehension, reasoning skill development
OT = letter formation and fine motor skill development
Reading specialist/learning disabilities = phonics instruction
What are the disadvantages of a teaming for reading approach to intervention?
Time-consuming – requires many team meetings to discuss student progress
Conflict/Tensions – due to difference in opinions about teaching philosophies and aligning goals
Increased workload for educators – regular team meetings, lesson plans, tracking progress, contacting families
Not every school has a reading specialist
Why has response to intervention been introduced as a new approach prior to intervention?
We don’t want to wait for a student to fail in order to qualify for special education services – students who are struggling must be identified and supported earlier long before academic failure occurs
We want to address student’s learning difficulties before formal intervention is needed/to prevent the child from needing special education services with the tiered approach
RTI allows for timely intervention – a child with learning difficulties can receive appropriate intervention sooner
RTI mitigates the risk of students falling further behind
What are the 3 criteria the NRC identified in a framework for evaluating scientific evidence?
- Threats to internal validity
- Threats to external validity
- Generalization
List the 3 major characteristics that constitute threats to internal validity
Does the study include a group of control subjects so that the effects of maturation can be determined?
Are the pretest and posttest measures conducted by different persons from those who delivered the treatment?
Are the gains merely the result of a statistical artifact (regression to the mean)
List the 4 major characteristics that constitute threats to external validity
Failure to randomly assign/select participants
Too small of a sample size
Too large of a sample size
Poorly defined population
List 2 major characteristics that relate to generalization
Are the treatment outcomes likely outside of the experimental environment/can they be generalized?
Are the treatment outcomes functional?
What is the internationally accepted instrument used by ASHA for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines?
The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE)