Final exam Flashcards
General Rules
-California is a CP state
-CP system will apply automatically to married couples and domestic partners domiciled in California, unless couple makes a valid agreement to the contrary
Community property
All property, real or personal, wherever situated, acquired by either spouse during the marriage while domiciled in CA is presumed CP. The burden is on the proponent to demonstrate property is SP. including labor or effort of either spouse during marriage. CP is divided in kind, and equally at divorce unless otherwise indicated.
Burden - CP/SP
The burden is on the proponent to demonstrate that property at issue is separate property
Separate property
Separate property is all property acquired before marriage, after permanent separation or divorce, or at any time by gift, devise, or bequest. All rents and income from separate property remain separate property. All SP is confirmed to the SP owner upon divorce.
Quasi community property
QCP is property acquired while the couple was domiciled in a non-CP state, which would have been classified as CP had it been acquired under the same circumstances in California. QCP will be treated like CP.
Tracing Rule
To determine whether an asset is CP or SP, a court will trace back to the source of funds used to acquire the asset. Joint title trumps tracing for real and personal property, but tracing is always allowed for jointly held bank accounts.
Putative spouse/domestic partner
Putative spouse is not legally married because the marriage is void or voidable, but one or both parties believe in good faith that the parties are legally married. Property acquired by putative spouse is quasi marital property
Quasi marital property
QMP is property acquired during a void or voidable marriage, which would have been CP or QCP if the marriage had not been void or voidable. QMP will be treated like CP.
Dividing business profits: If CP labor contributed to SP business–>
CP is entitled to a share of the increase in value of business
Formulas for dividing business profits
Pereira Formula AND van camp formula
Pereira/Van camp fact triggers
-Business started before marriage
-Business inherited during marriage
-Business started with SP funds during marriage
-Business started during marriage with CP labor—explain why
Pereira/Van Camp don’t apply
Pereira formula
Use when growth of the business asset is attributed to the work/management skills of the spouse. (Favors CP)
-SP: initial SP contribution (the value of SP business at the time of the marriage or the SP funds used to capitalize the business during marriage) + RRR (10% of SP contribution for each year family had SP business during marriage)
-CP: Value of biz - SP interest calculated above
Van camp formula
Use when character of business is reason for growth (Favors SP)
-CP: fair market value salary (FMV of spouse’s managerial services for each year family had SP business during marriage) - family expenses (paid with business earnings for each year family had SP business during marriage) - salary taken (actual salary taken by managing spouse for each year family had SP business during marriage)
-SP: value of biz-CP calculated above
CONCLUDE W/ WHICH FORMULA COURT WILL USE
When SP and CP contribute jointly to the purchase of property, and the property is titled in one spouse’s name
Each estate shares proportionally in value of estate, use Marriage of Moore!
Marriage of Moore
When SP and CP contribute jointly to the purchase of property, and property is titled in one spouse’s name, the SP and CP share in proportion to their contributions to the purchase price.
-SP% = SP down payment + (SP loan - CP payments on loan) / purchase price
-CP% = CP contributions toward purchase price / purchase price
Married Woman’s Special Presumption (MWSP)
Property acquired by a married woman in a writing, prior to 1975, is presumed to be her SP.
Property purchased w community funds and title is in wife’s name
When property is purchased with community funds and title is taken in wife’s name alone, it is presumed that husband made a gift of his interest to wife
Property taken as tenancy in common
If a married woman took title with her husband, her interest was presumed a tenancy in common unless a different intention was specified. Wife’s tenancy in common interest is presumptively SP under the MWSP
Overcoming MWSP presumption
-MWSP is rebutted by evidence that the wife controlled how title is taken
-Where title is taken in wife’s name, husband’s testimony that he did not intend to make a gift of his SP or his interest in the community is sufficient, if believed by the court, to overcome the MWSP.
MWSP amended
GR: When property is acquired by husband and wife in a written instrument in which the parties are described as husband and wife, the property is presumed CP.
GR: MWSP is inapplicable when property is acquired in joint tenancy form.
Jointly titled property where there is a SP contribution
LUCAS AND ANTI LUCAS
Lucas rule
Pre 1984: Jointly titled property is entirely community in nature in the absence of any evidence of an ORAL or WRITTEN agreement
Anti Lucas II
Any jointly-titled property taken AFTER 1987 is presumed CP for purposes of divorce. -SP can get share of ownership only if there is a WRITTEN agreement reserving it. -SP gets automatic reimbursement for down payments, payments for improvements, and payments that reduce the principal of a loan. -Rest is CP and will be divided.
Improvements
When SP used to improve CP or SP of other spouse, reimbursement is required, unless right to reimbursement waived in writing by SP contributor
Bank account GR
bank account should be characterized based on the source of funds deposited in the account
Separate account
Generally, all assets acquired during marriage, including any income earned, is presumptively community property. The fact that the funds are placed in a separate account, not a joint account, does not change the characterization of the property.
If spouse hid separate account
H will argue that W breached her fiduciary duty by both opening the account and by failing to disclose the account in the divorce proceedings.
Spouses are allowed to have a bank account in their name only. This by itself would not violate a spouse’s fiduciary duty. But the failure to disclose the bank account in the divorce proceeding is a clear violation of the fiduciary duty that is imposed on spouses. Spouses are required to disclose all of their assets and liabilities in a divorce action. H may be entitled to all funds if failure to disclose was willful wanton and malicious
Commingling GR
Commingling of SP funds with CP funds does not necessarily transform or transmute property from SP to CP. When CP and SP funds are commingled, the spouse claiming that property acquired with funds from that account is SP must show that SP funds were used to acquire the property.