FINAL EXAM Flashcards
CH 12,7,24,35
Consideration
something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal
Two parts of consideration
- legally sufficient value
- bargained-for-exchange
Legally Sufficient Value
something of value in the eyes of the law:
a promise to do something that you otherwise had no prior legal duty to do, performance of an action that you are otherwise not obligated to undertake, forbearance: refraining from an action that you have a legal right to undertake
Bargained-For-Exchange
the basis for a bargain struck between or among the contracting parties: distinguishes contracts from gifts
Adequacy
Involves “how much” consideration is given/if bargain was fair
General rule: courts do not typically get involved in determining adequacy as long as consideration is legally sufficient
Freedom of Contract
fundamental public policy recognizing one’s ability to enter freely into contractual arrangements; courts rarely interfere with contracts that have been voluntarily made
exceptions: illegal activities, unreasonably restrain trade, uneven bargaining power
Agreements that lack consideration
- Preexisting Duty: a promise to do what one already has a legal duty to do does not constitute legally sufficient consideration, prevent against extortion
- Past Consideration: promises made in return for actions or events that have already taken place are unenforceable (bargained for exchange is missing)
- Illusory promise: a statement that is uncertain and vague that is not considered a definite promise “as long as management thinks it is warranted”
Accord and Satisfaction
a common means of settling a disputed claim, whereby a debtor offers to pay a lesser amount than the creditor purports to be owed: typically occurs when amount of debt is in dispute
accord: agreement under which one party promises to give or perform and the other party to accept
satisfaction: performance (payment) which takes place after accord is executed
Release
a contract in which one party forfeits the right to pursue a legal claim against the other party
binding if given in good faith, stated in signed writing, accompanied by consideration
Promissory Estoppel
detrimental reliance: doctrine that can be used to enforce a promise when the promisee has justifiably relied on it when justice will be better served by enforcing the promise
- a promise may be enforced even though consideration was not given
- similar to quasi contact
Five elements of promissory estoppel
- must be a clear and definite promise
- promisor should have expected promisee would rely on the promise
- promisee reasonably relied on the promise by acting or refraining from some act
- promisee’s reliance was definite and resulted in substantial detriment
- enforcement of the promise is necessary to avoid injustice
Capacity
both parties must be competent
Contractual Capacity: Minors
18 years old cutoff, a minor can enter into any contract an adult can, provided that the contract is not one prohibited by law for minors.
voidable at option of minor, to avoid contract must clearly show intention not to be bound by it
exceptions: marriage, military, engaged in business as an adult, contracts for necessaries
Disaffirmance
legal avoidance or setting aside of a contractual obligation
- must express in words or conduct and disaffirm entire contract in a reasonable time period
*can disaffirm a contract after minor comes of age as long as it was entered into as a minor
Ratification
the acceptance or confirmation of an act or agreement that gives legal force to an obligation that previously was not enforceable
express: state orally or in writing
implied: behaves in a manner inconsistent with disaffirming
Contractual Capacity: Intoxication
condition in which a person’s normal capacity to act or think is inhibited by alcohol or some other drug: contract may be voidable at that person’s option. rare for contracts to be avoided due to intoxication as courts use an objective test
Contractual Capacity: Mentally Incompetent
Void: (not valid) if a court has previously determined that person is mentally incompetent and has appointed a guardian to represent them
Voidable: if a court has not previously judged a person to be incompetent and person did not know they were entering into an agreement with mentally incompetent person
Valid: if person was competent, lucid intervals (temporary period of sufficient intelligence)
Legality
purpose must be to accomplish a goal that is legal and not against public policy
contract prohibited by law is void and unenforceable from outset. if it become illegal the contract is discharged
Contract Contrary to Public Policy
- contracts in restraint of trade
- covenant not to compete: contractual promise of one party to refrain from conducting business similar to that of another party for a certain period of time within a specified geographic area
Unconscionable Contracts
contract or clause that is void on basis of public policy because one party was forced to accept terms that are unfairly burdensome and unfairly benefit stronger party
- procedural unconscionability: involves inconspicuous print, lack of an opportunity to read contract or ask questions
- substantive unconscionability: when contract or provision is oppressive or overly harsh: leave party without remedy for nonperformance
Adhesion contract
a standard form contract in which the stronger party dictates the terms on a take it or leave it basis: enforced unless terms unreasonably favor the drafter
Exculpatory Clause
a clause that releases a contractual party from liability in the event of monetary or physical injury, no matter who is at fault
not enforced: residential leases, employment contracts which remove employer’s potential liability for injuries to employees
can enforce: limit but do not release a party from liability, health clubs, etc
The Effect of Illegality
General rule: neither party to an illegal bargain can sue for breach and neither party can recover for performance rendered, except:
justifiable ignorance of facts, members of a protected class, severable contracts (divisible due to distinct parts), fraud, duress, or undue influence
Intellectual Property
any property resulting from intellectual and creative purposes
Trademark
distinctive word, symbol, sound, or design that identifies the manufacturer as the source of particular goods and distinguishes its products from those made or sold by other companies: person who used symbol is protected
Statutory protection of trademarks
Lanham Act of 1946: federal statute enacted in part to protect companies from losing business that use confusingly similar trademarked, based on common law
Federal Trademark Dilution Act: amendment of Lanham Act which allows trademark owners to bring a lawsuit in federal court for trademark dilution: protects against certain unauthorized uses even when the use involves noncompeting goods or is unlikely to confuse consumers
Dilution
unauthorized use of a distinctive and famous mark in a way that weakens the marks distinctiveness or harm its reputation: even if it is noncompeting goods
Trademark Registration
register with the US Patent and Trademark Office, can be registered if currently in commerce or intends to put it out within 6 (to 36) months
- USPTO gives notice of mark and receives symbol
- renew between 5th and 6th year and every 10 years after
Infringement
when someone else uses the registered trademark in its entirety or copies it to a substantial degree, intentionally or unintentionally without authorization
- must show it created likelihood of confusion
- remedy is injunction: restrains a person from committing an act
Distinctiveness of the Mark
must be sufficiently distinctive
most distinctive are outside the context of the particular product
- fanciful trademarks: involve invented words (Google)
- arbitrary: involve common words not associated with the product (Apple)
- suggestive: bring to mind something about product without directly describing (DQ)
- generic: refer to an entire class of products, weakest type, receive no protection
- secondary meaning: descriptive terms and color schemes that are not initially distinctive but customers associate them with specific items made (FedEx colors)
Service, Certification, and Collective Marks
service: distinguishes the services
certification: mark used by persons other than owner to certify quality or characteristics of specific goods or services
collective: mark used by members of a group or organization to certify certain characteristics (CPA)