Final Exam Flashcards
a|b
a divides b
b is a multiple of a
c = a(mod b)
c-a=bm
Direct Proof
Start with the assumption of the premise
Use known facts, definitions, and previously proven theorems to logically deduce the conclusion.
Each step should be justified and should follow logically from the previous steps.
Conclude by stating that the conclusion logically follows from the premise.
Proof by Contradiction
Assume the negation of the statement you want to prove (i.e., assume the statement is false).
Deduce logical consequences from this assumption.
Eventually, reach a contradiction with known facts or axioms.
Since a statement and its negation cannot both be true, the original assumption (that the statement is false) must be false, implying that the original statement is true.
Proof by Contrapositive
Begin by negating the conclusion of the theorem or statement.
Then, rewrite the negated conclusion in an equivalent form, which is the contrapositive of the original statement.
Prove the contrapositive using a direct proof.
Since the contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original statement, proving the contrapositive proves the original statement as well.
Proof by Division into Cases
Identify different cases that cover all possibilities related to the statement.
Prove each case separately using direct or another suitable method of proof.
Make sure that the cases are exhaustive (cover all possibilities) and mutually exclusive (no overlap between cases).
Conclude by showing that each case being true leads to the truth of the overall statement.
Proof of a Biconditional
Prove the implication in one direction (if part) using any suitable proof method (direct, contrapositive, contradiction, etc.).
Prove the implication in the other direction (only if part) using the same or another suitable proof method.
Conclude by stating that both implications have been proven, thus establishing the biconditional statement.
To prove a universal statement, we must…
show that it is true for all elements in the domain under consideration. This typically involves using a direct proof, mathematical induction, or proof by contradiction, depending on the nature of the statement
To prove an existential statement, we must…
provide at least one example or instance where the statement holds true. This demonstrates that there exists at least one element in the domain for which the statement is true. Proof by example, constructive proof, or proof by contradiction are common methods for proving existential statements.
To disprove a universal statement, we must…
find a counterexample, i.e., a specific element in the domain for which the statement is false. This shows that the statement does not hold true for all elements in the domain.
To disprove an existential statement, we must…
we must show that the statement is false for all elements in the domain. This can be accomplished by demonstrating that there is no element in the domain that satisfies the given conditions or by showing a contradiction.
Statement
In mathematics, a statement (also called a proposition)
is a declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both.
Conditional P → Q
False only when P is true and Q is false
Tautology
A tautology is a compound statement S that is true for
all possible combinations of truth values of the component
statements that are part of S
Contradiction
A contradiction is a compound statement S that is false
for all possible combinations of truth values of the component
statements that are part of S.
negation of the conditional statement
¬(P → Q) ≡ P ∧ ¬Q
the contrapositive of a conditional statement is
¬Q → ¬P
A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its
contrapositive
The converse of a conditional statement
P→Q is Q → P
Set
a well-defined collection of objects that can be thought of
as a single entity itself