Final Exam Flashcards

1
Q

Genetic Fallacy

A

Arguing that a claim is true or false solely because of its origin
ex. Selenas argument regarding aboriginal rights is no good, because she is of Latina descent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ad Hominem fallacy

“To the person”

A

Criticizing the person making the claim, not the claim itself
ex. 1993 PC ad attacking the way Chertien speaks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tu Quoque fallacy
“You also”

A

Thinks the argument is defeated by accusing the arguer of hypocrisy
ex. Al Gore argues we must reduce our carbon footprint, but he had an enormous one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Poisoning the well fallacy

A

Attempting to discredit a person by saying something in advance that will cause everything the person says to be discounted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fallacy of Composition

A

One commits the fallacy of composition when one argues that what is true of the parts of something must be true of the whole thing
ex. One beer can’t get you drunk, so 24 can’t get you drunk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fallacy of Division

A

One commits the fallacy of division when one argues that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts of the thing
ex. Kim is pretty, so every particle making her up is pretty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fallacy of equivocation

A

One equivocates when one uses a word in two senses in different premises of an argument
ex. pizza is better than nothing (1) (ie. Having nothing), and nothing (2) (ie. Not one thing) is better than sex, so pizza is better than sex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fallacy of appeal to popularity

A

Arguing a claim must be true merely because a substantial number of people believe it
ex. most Canadians believe in the monarchy, so it must be good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fallacy of appeal to tradition

A

Arguing that a claim must be true just because its part of a tradition
ex. women shouldn’t be allowed to vote, because they never have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Appeal to ignorance

A

Arguing that a lack of evidence proves something
ex. Biologists have searched for Bigfoot and never found him, so he probably doesn’t exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Burden of proof

A

If someone had the burden of proof, then someone has the responsibility for providing proof for their claim
ex. “animal emotions do not exist,” is a claim that must be based on reasons. The default position is not that animal emotions don’t exist, not that they do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fallacy of illicit appeal to emotion

A

The use of emotions as premises in an argument. Consists of trying to persuade someone of a conclusion solely by arousing their feelings, rather than presenting relevant reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Red Herring fallacy

A

Raising of an irrelevant issue during an argument in order to change the subject
ex. The Premiers tax policies should be popular, but I suspect he had an affair. The media should investigate that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Straw person fallacy

A

Occurs when someone distorts, weakens or oversimplifies someone’s position so that it can be more easily attacked or refuted
ex. Obama believes Reagan was transformative in uniting people, Clinton says Obama said he liked Reagans ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Unacceptable premise fallacies

A

Mistakes of reasoning where the conclusion is supported by a premise that is unacceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fallacy of begging the question

A

Trying to prove a conclusion true by using that conclusion as a premise. P therefore P.
ex. Elmo is in jail, and innocent people aren’t in jail, so Elmo is guilty

17
Q

False dilemma fallacy

A

Asserts that there are only two alternatives to consider in some issue when there are actually more than two
Ex. When the president states “every person has a dilemma in this nation, you are either with us, or you are against us
Asserts that there are two mutually exclusive alternatives, which in fact may not be mutually exclusive
Ex. Either the child knows how to make the right decision, or the parents raised her properly. But it is possible the parents raised her properly but this decision is too difficult to make on her own

18
Q

The slippery slope fallacy

A

Arguing without good reasons, that taking a particular step will inevitably lead to a further, undesirable step

19
Q

Fallacy of hasty generalization

A

When a conclusion is made about a whole group based in an inadequate sample of the group
ex. deciding based on two reviews of a product on amazon

20
Q

Fallacy of illicit appeal to authority

A

When we accept a claim from someone deemed an expert or authority on an issue who is not an expert on the issue

21
Q

Inductive argument

A

Strong/weak is a matter of degree: very strong, strong, weak, very weak
Strong if it is true
Weak if it is invalid

22
Q

Cogent vs. Non-cogent

A

All true premises and inductively strong reasoning= a cogent argument

23
Q

Enumerative induction

A

Some forms of induction reason from individual members of a group to conclusions about all members of the group
Ex. 12/12 squirrels we studied love nuts, so probably all squirrels love nuts.

24
Q

Probabilistic reasoning

A

probability values range from 0-1
0= the lowest degree of probability, totally false
1= the highest degree of probability, totally true
0.5= equally likely and unlikely

25
Q

Statistical syllogism

A

Lead from statistical generalizations about a group of people to a conclusion about one member of that group
Ex. Most pro basketball players are over 6 feet tall. Terrence is a basketball player, so Terrence is probably over 6 feet tall

26
Q

Causal Claim

A

An assertion about the cause of something
X caused Y

27
Q

Mills Methods: Method of agreement

A

If C occurs, and E occurs, so C causes E

28
Q

Mills methods: method of difference

A

If C does not occur, E does not occur, so C causes E

29
Q

Mills methods: Joint method of agreement and difference

A

If C occurs E occurs, and if C does not occur E does not occur, so C causes E

30
Q

Mills methods: Method of concomitant variation

A

If C occurs the chance of E raises, if C is absent the chances of E lowers, so C causes E

31
Q

Inference to the best explanation

A

Theories or hypotheses that try to explain why something is the way it is, why something happened why something is the case.