Final Ch. 12-17 Flashcards
leadership
exercise of influence by one member of a group or organization over other members to help the group or organization achieve its goals
leader trait approach
effective leaders possess certain qualities of traits that help a group or organization achieve its goals
traits in leader trait approach
intelligence, task-relevant knowledge, dominance, self-confidence, emotional maturity, integrity and honest, tolerance for stress, energy/activity levels
Behavioral theories of leadership
we can train people to be leaders
Initiating structure
behaviors a leader engages in to ensure that subordinates and teams perform their jobs and tasks acceptably and effectively
consideration
extent to which the leader trusts, respects and values good relationships with their followers.
effective leaders perform behaviors that include
initiating structure
and consideration
Fiedler’s contingency theory
leadership effectiveness
leadership effectiveness is determined by
- the characteristics of individuals
- the situations in which they find themselves
Fiedler’s contingency theory (distinct leadership styles)
- relationship oriented
- task oriented
* assumes that style is fixed
Relationship oriented (fiedler)
leader wants to be liked and get along with subordinates
getting the job done is the second priority
Task oriented (fiedler)
wants high performance and accomplishment of all tasks
getting the job done os the first priority
Situational characteristics of fiedler’s contingency theory:
leader-member relations
task structure
position power
Very favorable situation for leading
good leader-member relations
high task structure
high position of power
or good , high, low
or good, low, high
according to contingency theory, when are oriented leaders successful?
in very unfavorable situations because they can add structure and demand performance
in very favorable situations because the task is taken care of
in favorable situations _____ oriented leaders may interfere
relationship
according to contingency theory, when are relationship oriented leaders successful?
moderate situations
Path Goal Theory
describes how leaders can motivate their followers to achieve group and organizational goals and the kinds of behaviors leaders can engage in to motivate followers. `
guidelines for path-goal theory
- determine what outcomes subordinates are trying to obtain in the workplace
- reward subordinates for performing at a high level or achieving their work goals by giving them desired outcomes
- make sure subordinates believe they can obtain their work goals and perform at a high level
Directive Behavior
lets subordinates know what tasks need to be performed and how they should be performed
Supportive behavior
lets subordinates know that their leader cares about them and is looking out for them
Participate Behavior
enables subordinates to be involved in making decisions that affect them
Achievement-Oriented behavior
pushes subordinates to do their best
Path-goal theory characteristics of an effective leader
motivate followers to achieve goals
ensure they have control over outcomes their subordinates desire
reward subordinates for performing at a high level
raise subordinate beliefs about ability to achieve
consider subordinate characteristic and work type
Vroom and Yetton moedel
describes the different ways in which leaders can make decisions
offers guidelines about the extent to which subordinates should participate in decision making
autocratic decision making style
the leader makes the decision without input from subordinates
consultative decision making style
subordinates have some input but the leader makes the final decision
A group style
the group makes the decision and the leader is just another group member
the delegated style
the leader makes subordinates solely responsible for making decisions
Criteria for decision making style
- nature of tasks
- level of task interdependence
- output being produced
- characteristics of the employees
Leader Member Exchange Theory
Leadership is a relationship between leader and follower
leaders do not treat all subordinates equally; leaders have special relationships with their in-group
These different relationships have a strong effect on subordinates’ performance and satisfaction
In group (LMX)
the leader trusts them and has high interaction
there is personal compatibility, subordinate competence and/or extraverted personality
Outgroup (LMX)
formal relations between leader and subordinate
Transformational Leader
occurs when a leader transforms or changes his or her followers in three ways ways has charisma
intellectually stimulates followers
engages in developmental consideration
Things that transactional leaders do
articulate a vision
induce followers to support their vision
develop followers
engage in transactional leadership
Things that transactional leaders do
articulate a vision
induce followers to support their vision
develop followers
engage in transactional leadership
Power
the ability to get others to do something they might not otherwise do
principal means of directing and controlling organizational goals and activities
Individual Power
formal power
informal power
formal power
legitimate power, reward power, coercive power, information power
informal power
expert power, referent power, charismatic
Legitimate power
formal authority to control and use organizational resources to accomplish organizational goals; power from one’s position in an organizational hierarchy
reward power
ability to administer valued rewards to others
coercive power
power to administer punishment
information power
power to provide access and control over information
expert power
informal power wielded as a result of expertise, a special skill or knowledge
referent power
the individual power base derived from the degree to which one is liked, respected and admired by others
charismatic power
an intense form of referent power that comes from a person’s unique personality or capabilities
Organizational Conflict
when the goal-directed behavior of one person or group blocks the goal-directed behavior of another person or group
can be functional or dysfunctional
Optimal level of conflict
High level of performance, medium level of conflict, at the apex
Sources of conflict
differentiation
task relationships
scarcity of resources
differentiation
people and tasks are grouped or split up into different functions and divisions; each group focuses on specific tasks that help the organization increase its performance
differentiation arises
when functional orientations and status inconsistencies emerge between groups
resulting in conflict and lower organizational performance
task relationship conflict
overlapping authority
task interdependence (lack there of)
inequitable performance evaluation systems
overlapping authority
organizational tasks are interrelated and affect one another so if two different functions or divisions claim authority for the same task, conflict can develop
inequitable performance evaluation systems
rewards for some functions but not others can create conflict
scarcity of resources
limited resources in the organization (salaries, benefits, interesting projects) can create conflict
Collaboration
interest in helping other = high
interest in achieving individual goals= high
Compromise
interest in helping others = middle
interest in achieving individual goals= middle
Accommodation
interest in helping others = high
interest in achieving individual goals= low
Avoidance
interest in helping others = low
interest in achieving individual goals= low
Competition
interest in helping others = low
interest in achieving individual goals= high
Compromise
bargaining and negotiating to reach a solution acceptable to both parties. no winner, no loser
Collaboration
both parties try to satisfy their own goals as well as the goals of the other side
Accommodation
one party allows the other to dictate a solution and achieve its goals. One side wins and the other loses
Avoidance
both parties refuse to recognize the real source of the problem and that conflict exists and act as if there were not a problem
Competition
each party is focused on pursuing its own interests. Neither party takes the interests of the other into account
Promoting compromise
emphasize common goals focus on the problem focus on interests, not demands create opportunities for joint gain focus on what is fair
Decision Making
the process by which members of an organization choose a specific course of action to respond to the opportunities and problems that confront them
Classical Decision Making assumption
people have access to all necessary information
people choose the best possible solution
Administrative decision-making model
descriptive
satisficing S
bounded rationality
steps in classical decision making model
list all the alternatives
list consequences of each alternative
rank sets from most to least preferred based on personal preference
Problems of the classical decision making model
limited information is available
cognitive abilities are limited due to information overload
impossible to make the best possible decision
Availability heuristic
the tendency to determine the frequency of an event by how easy these events are to remember
*what is available to you through memory, vivid events, catastrophic events, events that evoke emotion, recent events
Representative heuristic
tendency to predict the likelihood of an event occurring from the extent to which the event is typical of similar kinds of past events
*biases here occur with failure to consider base rate and by overestimating the likelihood of a rare event
Anchoring and adjustment heuristic
tendency to make decisions bases on adjustments from some initial amount
Risk Aversion
tendency to prefer a sure gain of a moderate amount over a riskier outcome, even if the riskier outcome might have a higher payoff
Escalation of commitment bias
tendency to invest additional time, money or effort into poor decisions
Heurisitics
shortcuts or rules of thumb used to simplify decision making
leads to biases-systematic errors that lowers decision making quality
Base rate
actual recorded frequency with which an event occurs
example of anchoring and adjustment heuristic
salary adjustments are often made from an “anchor” or initial pay. If the anchor is not reasonable, this heuristic will lead to biased decision making
why does escalation of commitment occur
decision makers do not want to admit that they have made a mistake
decision makers believe that an additional commitment of resources is justified to recoup losses
when they view things in a negative light they tend to make riskier decisions
Advantages of group decision making
availability/diversity of members’ skills, knowledge, expertise
enhanced memory
greater ability to correct errors
greater decision acceptance
Disadvantages of group decision making
time to make a decision
group conflict
diffusion of responsibility
potential for groupthink
Groupthink
a pattern of faulty decision making that occurs in cohesive groups whose members strive for agreement instead of accuracy
minimize groupthink
devils advocate
second meeting
gather information from outside people leader refrains from expressing own opinions
leader encourages thoughtfulness/criticism