Final Flashcards
What is descriptive epi and what questions does it ask
defines frequency and distribution of diseases and other health related events
how many, who, where, when
What is analytic epi and what questions does it ask
analyzes determinants of health problems
how, why
What are the different types of descriptive epi studies
case reports
case series
ecological
cross-sectional
What is a case report study
a single occurence, description of symptoms, signs and diagnosis
What is a case series study
several occurrences with common features
what is an ecological study
study of aggregate data on populations
what is a cross-sectional study
snapshot of a study pop, data at indiv level
What is a big issue in ecological studies
temporality
What are some strengths in cross-sectional studies
- data at indiv level
- Subgroups based on E+ or O+
- generalizeable
- helps identify resource needs for hlth intervention
- generate new hypotheses on relationship between exposure and disease
What are some limitations of ecological
- No objective measure of the temporal ordering of exposure and disease
- Cannot examine causality
- Identify high proportion of prevalent cases of long duration
- May under-represent diseases with short duration
What studies are analytic
Observational:
case control
cohort
Experimental: RCT
What are you analyzing in analytic epi
- Hypothesis
- Exposure causes outcome/ exposure precedes the outcome
- E-> O
- If the exposure casus the disease, then exposed indiv will have more disease than the unexposed indiv
What are the 4 causal criteria you need to know?
Temporality:does the exposure precede the outcome
Consistency
Strength of association: stronger association more credible the results will be
Biological gradient (dose response): the more of the exposure the more disease you can have. Is the correct type of medicine being used and dosing at the right amount
What is the difference between observational and experiemental
O: investigators do not intervene on or control study participants’ exposure status
E: investigators assign an exposure to study participants
Describe a case control study
- groups selected in terms of whether they do or do not have outcome of interest
- groups compared retrospectively with respect to exposure to potential risk factors
Describe cohort study
- indiv selected based on their exposure
2. incidence of outcome over time is assessed
what is a case control study design
- Start with outcome those who have the disease (cases)
- Select controls those who do not have the disease (controls)
- Then examine if each group was exposed or not exposed
Advantages of case-control studies
- Fast and inexpensive
- rare diseases
- diseases with long delay between E+ and O+
- Population is dynamic
- Look at multiple E+
6.
Disadvantages of Case-control studies
- 1 hlth O+ at a time
- inefficient for rare diseases
- Temporal relationship between E+ and disease is unclear
- Participant recall
- Cannot measure disease frequency since indiv with disease are pre-selected by investigator
Are case control studies
Retrospective or prospective
How are indiv selected?
What measure do you use
- Retrospective
- Selected on their health outcomes (cases) - Disease - No disease
- Measure prior exposure between disease and no disease
- Odds Ratio
What is an odds ratio
OR = ad/bc
What are the interpretations of OR
=1
>1
<1
OR = 1 – exposure has no effect
OR > 1 – exposure is a risk factor
OR < 1 – exposure is a protective factor
What is the classic cohort study design
- there is a defined population that is not randomly assigned
- Then they are put into exposed or not exposed
- within each group there is disease or no disease.
Why choose prospective designs?
More control over cohort selection, exposure measurement, follow-up procedures, and outcome measurement
Greater ability to account for other variables (i.e. confounders)
Who choose retrospective designs?
Faster and less expensive
Existing records available to reconstruct the cohort, assess exposure history, and assess outcomes
Strengths of cohort studies
Can directly measure incidence outcomes
- Temporality of E+ and O+ is clear
- Good for common outcomes that occur within a relatively short time frame
- Useful for rare exposures: can study multiple
Limitations of cohort studies
- Need large samples
- Inefficient for rare or very delayed outcomes
- Potential for confounding when E+ is not randomly assigned
- Can be expensive and labor-intensive
- LTFU
- continuity of staff and funding is uncertain
What are the three possible sources of bias when evaluating a screening program that may result in a false picture of its efficacy:
- Volunteer Bias (People who choose to participate in the screening program may be healthier or at higher risk of developing the disease than those that don’t participate)
- Lead-time bias (Lead-time is the amount of time by which the diagnosis was advanced due to screening. Lead time bias means that survival may erroneously appear to be increased among screen-detected cases simply because the diagnosis was made earlier in the course of the disease.)
- Length-biased sampling (•Slowly progressing forms of a disorder tend to be more easily detected and have a better prognosis than rapidly progressing forms•Screening tests appear to be more effective than they are when comparing screened to unscreened populations in term of survival rates)
Definition of incidence
Number of new cases that occur during a specified period of time within a population at risk
What is the RR formula
CI among exposed/ CI among unexposed
A/ (A+B)/ C/ (C+D)
What is the AR formula and interpretation
CI among exposed- CI among Unexposed
Excess amount of disease due to the exposure
what is the AR % formula and interpretation
(CI among E+ - CI among Unexposed)/ CI among exposed
The percentage of disease in the exposed that can be attributable to the exposure