Final Flashcards
What is the systems view on episodic vs semantic memory?
episodic and semantic memory are different memory systems that store different types of info and have different degrees and types of organization of info
What is the process view on episodic vs semantic memory?
episodic and semantic memory are the same system with 2 different types of info (specific/episodic vs generalized/semantic memories)
What are the different nodes in semantic memory?
stimulus word - structural node - semantic node
What is the composition of semantic networks?
consists of nodes (concepts), features (properties related to nodes) and links (relations between features and nodes)
organization is hierarchical/contains information in itself
cognitive economy
What is the concept of cognitive economy?
features or properties are represented only once at the highest level of the hierarchy
What are some assumptions of the hierarchical network model?
it takes time to move from one level of the hierarchy to a different level
it takes additional time to retrieve features stored at a level (should be faster to answer category membership classes than questions about properties)
smaller categories are lower down on the hierarchy
Describe the sentence verification task experiment.
answering true or false to a series of questions as fast as you can
ex. category membership
s0: a canary is a canary
s1: a canary is a bird
s2: a canary is an animal
ex. properties
p0: a canary is yellow
p1: a canary can fly
p2: a canary has skin
slowly moving further from the canary, takes more time
property judgements slower
also consistent with category size effect:
- members of smaller categories classified faster
What are the problems with the hierarchical network model?
can’t explain reversals of category size effect
can’t explain typicality effect
- in model, atypical and typical members are at the same level of hierarchy so they should take the same amount of time
What is the spreading activation network model?
concepts organized in network but it is not hierarchical, there is not structure imposed on nodes
features still stored with concepts
length of links between nodes represents strength of associations (further = weaker)
assumes activation spreads between concepts and decreases with distance
Describe the lexical decision task.
words and nonwords presented one at a time, subjects have to decide if each letter string is a word
measure time to make each lexical decision
results:
- words following related words identified faster than words following unrelated words (semantic priming)
What is the Moses effect?
“How many of each type of animal did Moses bring on the Ark with him?”
an example of spreading activation allowing us to answer 2 despite the fact that Moses brought no animals, it was Noah
What are the different levels of analysis in semantic priming?
letter analysis
word analysis
semantic analysis
Describe an experiment by Anderson on the Fan effect.
had people learn made up associations between concepts (so they had no prior knowledge)
varied the number of associations for each concept
participants were faster to recognize info when there were fewer associations, suggesting more suggestions leads to less activation of each
suggests there is a cost to knowing too much
- however benefit is that increased learning leads to sets of interrelated facts and easier retrieval of a concept, outweighing the costs
What are the advantages of the spreading activation model?
it is the best model because it can explain:
semantic priming
- spread of activation in a model
typicality effect
- closer distance between concepts = more typical
category size effect + its reversals
- effects due to semantic difference, not hierarchy levels
the fan effect
- spread of activation and interference from other associations
Describe McNamarras experiment on the spreading activation effect. (lion-tiger)
demonstrated 3-step priming using a lexical decision task
mane - lion - tiger - stripes
when mane becomes activated, spreads to related concepts, priming lion which primes tiger etc
What were the results of Chwilla and Kolks experiment on spreading activation and 2/3 step priming.
showed that priming advantage decreases with distance
more advantage with 2 step than 3 step
What is the problem with the spreading activation model?
simple network models cant represent richness of our semantic and episodic knowledge
need more than simple associations between nodes
solution: ACT model
What is the ACT model?
an example of how a network model may be elaborated to more fully capture the richness of our knowledge
all info represented as propositions instead of concepts
- smallest unit of knowledge
- can be either true or false
ellipse represents “meeting point” of the elements of a proposition
- agent, object, and relation
ex. proposition “dog chase cat”
ellipse
- dog (agent)
- cat (object)
- chase (relation)
specifics can also be built in (episodic memory)
What are schemas?
general knowledge structures that represent organized clusters of knowledge
represent general procedures, objects, events, or sequences of events
What are scripts?
a particular schema of knowledge organized around routine activities
give us an organized structure to guide encoding, comprehension, and retrieval
ex. visiting the doctor, eating at a restaurant
What is script theory?
when a script is invoked, all typical actions of script are activated
when not all typical events are expressed, omitted events are inferred
Describe the first experiment by Bower, Black, and Turner on script theory. (recognition of components)
had participants generate scripts for routine activities
compared scripts and found a high degree of agreement for components and order of events for scripts
Describe the second experiment by Bower, Black, and Turner on script theory. (recognition test)
had subjects read 18 stories based on different scripts
- either 1, 2, or 3 stories based on each script
- not all actions/events included in each story
given a recognition test for memory of stories
results:
- stated script items confidently identified
- other items (new items not associated with a script) could be confidently rejected
- not-stated script items (new items associated with script) identified with a high degree of confidence despite not being read
- effects increased as more scripts read
Describe the Script-Pointer-Plus-Tag theory.
when a script is activated the store in semantic memory, represents both stated and inferred typical events
we “tag on” atypical actions of the story to the script and have better memory for these actions since they are tagged on and more distinctive
disrupt script actions, better remembered than those irrelevant to script