Final! Flashcards
Public Sphere
express views/wants in light of that of others’
Deliberation
I support this and heres why
Habermas and the Hierarchy of Deliberative Opinion
(From Least to Greatest) No Opinion - Opinion but no reasons - Opinion with reasons - Opinion in light of reasons of others, even opponents
Political Homopholy
surround yourself with like-minded individuals, which reinforce our own views
Mediatization
the process by which the media have come to play a central role in politics, influencing institutions, performing strategic functions for political elites
Information Regime
a stable system of political organizations linking citizens to one another and to the state, and adapted to the ecology of communication and information at any given time
First Info Regime
1830s to late 19th Century
mail-based national system; national scale political parties and new businesses
Second Info Regime
Late 19th Century to mid-20th Century
Industrial-scale administrative complexity, diversification, specialization, interest groups, civic orgs, professionals
Third Info Regime
1950s to 1990s
emergence of mass media, communication, centralized high-cost, asymmetric, mass communication
Fourth Info Regime
1990s to Present
With the emergence of digital media allows individuals to find and communicate with one another; radically decentralized and inexpensive communication; network dynamics, info abundance
Public Agenda
the set of issues that the public thinks is the most important
Policy Agenda
the set of issues to which government institutions are devoting attention
News Agenda
the set of issues that professional news media are covering most prominently; tells us what to think about; social media changes this; citizen generated content can reach news orgs
Issue Framing
using words that elicit one set of values, beliefs, or attitudes rather than others in a way that affects what opinion people express
Episodic Framing
describing discrete events, without context
Thematic Framing
describing context, trends, causes, interconnections among events, why things happen and how we should think about solving them
Equivalency Framing
people respond differently to numerically equivalent statements as a function of whether these are framed in terms of loss or gain
Framing effects are stronger with….
repetition, more political knowledge, talking with politically-similar others
Nelson, Clawson, and Oxley Theory
ideas used to frame certain stories will also influence viewers’ opinions on the story
Nelson, Clawson, and Oxley Methodology
lab setting with undergrads, warm-up segment, then 7 min clip compilations, “tolerance measure” questions
Nelson, Clawson, and Oxley Findings
news framing matters for viewers’ tolerance
Learning Model
mass media messages provide new info about an issue
Priming/Cognitive Accessability Model
Political judgements and evaluations are based on only a subset of all potentially relevant thoughts
Expectancy Model
asymmetrically stresses the importance of gain/loss and variability in risk involved in problems among other accessible considerations, which influences your opinion
Cognitive Bias
pattern of thought involving a predisposition toward a predictable error, mis-estimation, or mental shortcut (Ex: gamblers’ fallacy, coin flips)
Anchoring Effect
exposing someone to an arbitrary number will influence another numeric estimate even if there is no relationship between the two values
False Consensus
we tend to be bad at estimating how many people agree with us on a certain issue, being biased to favor our own viewpoint
Third-Person Perception
on average, people agree with us on a certain issue, being biased to favor our own viewpoint
Hostile Media Effect
selective perception and recall of news as being biased against one’s views
Selective Exposure/Acceptance
preference for news and other messages that reinforce existing attitudes and opinions
Belief in Falsehoods
actively held belief that is factually incorrect; cognitive biases support false beliefs
Priming
practice of highlighting particular issues or features in a complex situation to emphasize the considerations around which opinions are formed
Cueing
looking for cues/labes
Bolstering
selecting factoids to support positions
Weighing
using emotions to direct attention
Anchoring
packing and narrating this mediated information in terms of personal life experiences
Factoids
bits and pieces of info that fill in emerging understandings of a situation
Vallone, Ross, and Lepper Question
is the hostile media phenomenon really an exception to the rule of confirmatory bias in cognition and perception?
Vallone, Ross, and Lepper Methodology
36 min of TV reports of Beirut Massacre shown to pro-Arab and pro-Israeli groups, then questionnaire RE: fairness/objectivity of segments
Vallone, Ross, and Lepper Findings
disagreed about material; more knowledge —> more inclined to view bias; tendency for partisans to view media coverage of controversial events as unfairly biased/hostile to their position
Heuristics
cognitive shortcuts
Constructionism
focuses on how individuals form different beliefs from media exposure which depends on demographics, psychology, and the content of a particular medium
Schema
a cognitive structure consisting of organized knowledge about situations and individuals that comes from prior experiences; serves as a filter for info
Knowledge Gap
high-status, well-informed citizens acquire more info at a faster clip that their low-status, poorly informed counterparts
Values
understanding what is good and not good
Political beliefs
understanding of what is true and not true; falsifiable in principle
Opinions
positions on specific political questions of the day
Attitudes
enduring dispositions about problems
Receive-Accept-Sample (RAS) Model
many opinion reflect “top of the head” thinking based on highly filtered info, not necessarily tightly connected to values and beliefs
Dual Process Models
thinking tends to be peripheral, unless motivation, interest, urgency, and skill are brought to bear
Accessibility and Agenda Setting
Most accessible information is what is most important and/or most recent
Applicability and Framing
Applying certain values, presented from a frame to a certain issue
Inclusiveness of Press
- Established by Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938)
- doesn’t just cover newspapers, pretty much any publication (like fliers)
Limited Content-Based Restrictions in the Press
- Established by many cases
- “viewpoint discrimination” just as in speech
Press Protection from libel sanctions
- Established by NYT v. Sullivan (1964)
- Journalists have a generally higher level of protection from libel
- Price you pay for free press is occasional mistakes; news requires some tolerance
No prior restraint of the press
- Established by NYT v. US (1971 - The Pentagon Papers)
- Effective news orgs will sometimes expose gov’t deception that the government doesn’t want to be seen