Final Flashcards
Criminal Law
The branch of law that deals with disputes or actions involving criminal penalties (as opposed to civil law)
Civil Law
A system of jurisprudence, including private law and governmental actions, for settling disputes that do not involve criminal penalties
Precedents
Prior cases whose principles are used by judges as the bases for their decisions in present cases
Public Law
Cases involving the action of public agencies or officials
Trial Court
The first court to hear a criminal or civil case
Court of Appeals (Appellate Court)
A court that hears the appeals of trial-court decisions
Supreme Court
The highest court in a particular state or in the United States. This court primarily serves an appellate function
Jurisdiction
The domain over which an institution or member of an institution has authority
Due Process
Proceeding according to law and with adequate protection for individual rights
Writ of Habeas Corpus
A court order demanding that an individual in custody be brought into court and shown the cause for detention. Habeas Corpus is guaranteed by the Constitution and can be suspended only in cases of rebellion or invasion
Chief Justice
The Justice on the Supreme Court who presides over the court’s public sessions
Senatorial Courtesy
The practice whereby the president, before formally nominating a person for a federal district judgeship, finds out whether the senators from the candidate’s state support the nomination
Judicial Review
The power of the courts to declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional
Supremacy Clause
A clause of Article VI of the constitution that states that all laws passed by government and all treaties are the supreme laws of the land and superior to all laws adopted by any state or subdivision
Ripeness
A case that is ready for litigation and does not depend on hypothetical future events
Standing
The right of an individual or organization to initiate a court case
Mootness
A criterion used by courts to avoid hearing cases that no longer require a resolution
Writ of Certiorari
A formal request by an appellant to have the Supreme Court review a decision of a lower court (Certiorari: latin for make more certain)
Amicus Curiae
“Friend of the Court,” an individual or group that is not a party to a lawsuit but seeks to assist the court in reaching a decision by presenting an additional brief
Brief
A written document in which an attorney explains - using case precedents - why a court should rule in favor of his or her client
Oral Argument
The stage in Supreme Court proceedings in which attorneys for both sides appear before the court to present their positions and answer questions posed by the justices
Opinion
The written explanation of the Supreme Court’s decision in a particular case
Concurrence
An opinion agreeing with the decision of the majority but not with the rationale provided in the majority opinion
Dissenting Opinion
A decision written by a justice who voted with the minority opinion in a particular case, in which the justice fully explains the reasoning behind his or her opinion
Judicial Restraint
The judicial philosophy whose adherents refuse to go beyond the text of the Constitution in interpreting its meaning
Judicial Activism
The judicial philosophy that posits that the Court should see beyond the text of the Constitution in interpreting its meaning
Judicial Activism
The judicial philosophy that posits that the court should see beyond the text of the constitution or statute to consider broader societal implications for its decisions
Class-Action Suit
A lawsuit in which a large number of persons with common interests join together under a representative party to bring or defend a lawsuit, as when hundreds of workers join together to sue a company
Civil Liberties
The protections of citizens from improper governmental action
Civil Rights
The legal or moral claims that citizens are entitled to make on the government
Strict Scrutiny
The most stringent standard of judicial review of a government’s actions in which the government must show that the law serves a “compelling state interest”