Final Flashcards
Types of Remedies
1) Compensatory
2) Coercive
3) Declaratory
4) Restitutionary
5) Punitive
6) Ancillary
Legal Remedies
- All kinds of damages
- Quiet title
- Quasi K
- Replevin
Equitable Remedies
- Injunctions
- Specific Performance
- Accounting for Profits
- Equitable Lien
- Constructive Trust
- Rescission
Statutory Remedies
Declaratory Judgment
Goals of Remedies
1) Put π in rightful position
2) Deter wrongful conduct
Rightful Position
Where π would have been but for the wrong
Value Rule
Value is the lowest of:
- market value
- replacement value
- capitalized income stream
Lesser of 2 Rule
π whose property has been injured may recover the lesser of the diminution in the prop’s value or its replacement cost
Special Purpose Property
Prop will be valued outside the marketplace if:
-improvement is unique & specifically built for the specific purpose for which it was designed
-being used for that specific use
-there is no appropriate market for the sale of the type of prop for that use
AND
-improvement must be appropriate at time of taking & use must be economically feasible & reasonably expected to be replaced
K Damages
Expectancy -> position π would be in if ∆ had upheld the K
Can be awarded even where it exceeds K price
Tort Damages
Reliance -> position π was in before ∆ committed the wrong
Consequential Damages
Those that flow from the injury, but are not the injury itself
Limitations on Consequential Damages
- Only those naturally & proximately caused by the harm
- Not available merely for non-payment of $ unless loan K where lender breaches or insurance K w/ bad faith delay or refusal to pay
- Not awarded unless ∆ was put on notice of special circs giving rise to them
Economic Loss Rule
Negligence π cannot sue for mere econ harm, but must show some physical impact to his person or property
Liquidated Damages
Can’t be “so way off base” that it’s unfair:
- was amount reas in light of anticipated damages?
- is amount reas in light of actual damages?
- are there difficulties in proof of amount of loss?
- is the amount unreasonably large so as to amount to a penalty?
Cannot K away ALL remedies
Avoidable Consequences
Where π has taken reas, even if not ideal, measures to mitigate, full damages will be awarded
Collateral Source Rule
A personal injury award may NOT be reduced or offset by any payment from an independent party not involved in the case
Review of Jury Awards on Appeal
Defer to the judgment of the jury unless the award is “monstrously excessive” or “so large as to shock the conscience of the ct”
One factor = whether the award is out of line compared to other awards in similar cts
Constitutional Harms
Still have to prove up damages, even when a constitutional right has been violated
You only automatically get nominal damages
Prejudgment Interest
Must be taken into account, regardless of good faith dispute or π’s partial liability
Net Present Value
Trial cts must consider the net present value of all awards of future damages
Punitive Damages
- Offset cost-benefit analysis where compensatory damages are insufficient to deter behavior
- Require MALICE = willful & conscious disregard for the rights & safety of others
Corporate Liability for Punitives
Find actor high enough up that corp can be bound:
- principle
- reckless employment of unfit agent
- P or mgr ratified or approved behavior
TC Calculation of Punitives
- degree of reprehensibility
- wealth of ∆
- amount of compensatory damages
- amount needed to deter (profitability of wrong)
- $ penalties under gov’t regulations
- potential punitives in RELATED cases
AC review of Punitives
1) Degree of reprehensibility
- -physical v. econ harm
- -amount of indifference/reckless disregard
- -intentional malice??
2) Ratio between harm suffered (as reflected by compensatories) and punitive award
3) Comparison of punitives w/ civil or crim penatlies for comparable misconduct
Injunction Elements
1) Irreparable injury
2) Ripeness
3) Lack of mootness
4) w/in wise discretion of ct
Types of Irreparable Injury
- Loss cannot be replaced (unique prop/intangible rights)
- Damages would be difficult to ascertain
- Similar goods are difficult/impossible to find on market
- Risk of multiple litigation
- Insolvent or immune ∆
- Harm from interim uncertainty
- Loss of legit tactical advantage
Ripeness
Have to show real, imminent danger - not remote or speculative
Voluntary Cessation
Does NOT render case moot UNLESS ∆ can demonstrate that there is no reas expectation that the wrong will be repeated
- -effectiveness of discontinuance
- -bona fides of expressed intent to comply
- -Character of past violations
Basic Types of Injunctions
1) Preventative - don’t let this bad thing happen
2) Reparative - fix the bad thing
3) Structural - create a good thing, even if it’s new
- -prophylactic: enjoin conduct lawful in itself to prevent, deter, or reduce wrongful consequences in future