Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

M&A > Final > Flashcards

Final Flashcards

1
Q

Letter of Intent

A
  • Clarifies deal terms (decided v. open)
  • sets up due diligence

**Terms, even if originally enforceable, become unenforceable if LOI expires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

LOI Binding Provisions

A
  • No shop
  • Confidentiality
  • Governing Law
  • Public announcements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

LOI Non-Binding Provisions

A
  • Deal terms
  • Reps & Warranties
  • Terminations Fees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DE §144

A

Shareholder ratification/cleansing vote

  • Burden of proving entire fairness shifted to π if transaction is approved by a majority of the minority s/hs
  • Not a “get out of jail free” card
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DE §251 Statutory Mergers

A
  • By operation of law, shares of T become shares of B (according to ratio established by merger K)
  • ALL assets & liabilities follow
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DE §251 Merger Approvals

A
  • Both bds
  • T s/h’s
  • B s/h’s UNLESS:
  • –B’s shares unaffected,
  • –B’s certificate of incorporation is not changed; AND
  • –B is NOT using more than 20% of shares outstanding immediately prior to deal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DE §253 Short-Term Mergers

A

When parent owns 90%+ of subsidiary’s stock, ONLY approval needed is P bd

-Absent illegality or fraud, appraisal is the EXCLUSIVE remedy available to minority s/h who objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DE Triangular Mergers

A 
Forward = NewCo survives
Reverse= T survives (use if anything non-transferable)

APPROVALS: both bds, s/h of dissolved corp, s/h of surviving corp (unless §251(f))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DE §262 Appraisal Rights

A
  • Only applies in §251 mergers
  • Dissenting s/h has right to be cashed out based on FMV of entire entity
  • EXCEPTIONS
    (1) Market out - s/h in publicly traded company
    (2) surviving s/h not entitled to vote under §251(f)
  • EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION
  • –rights are revived where s/h is forced to accept consideration other than stock
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DE §271 Asset Acquisition

A
  • T sells all or substantially all assets to B
  • Negotiations determine which liabilities go with them
  • Remaining car’s must be allowed for before consideration can be distributed to s/hs

-APPROVALS: both bds, T s/h, NOT B s/h

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“Substantially All”

A

(1) Vital to operation of corp
(2) Over 50%
(3) Out of the ordinary transaction
(4) Substantially effects existence and purpose of corp
(5) Asset strikes at the heart of corp’s existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DE Stock Acquisitions

A

From T - need both bd approvals

From T s/h - only need approval of B’s bd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CA §183 De Facto Mergers

A

Regardless of form, substance of deal if merger if:

(1) transfer of all shares & assets
(2) assumption of liabilities
(3) pooling of interests
(4) absorption and dissolution
(5) joinder of officers & directors
(6) T execs retained by B
(7) S/hs of absorbed corp surrender existing shares for newly issued shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DE Independent Legal Significance Doctrine

A

An action taken pursuant to the auth’y of the various sections of the law constitute acts of independent legal significance and their validity is not dependent on other sections of the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CA §1200 Board Approvals

A

Merger: both

Asset: both

Exchange: B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CA §1201 S/h Approvals

A

If co’s bd approval is req’d, it’s s/hs must also approve UNLESS:
(1) shares remain unchanged
OR
(2) corp will own, immediately after the reorganization, equity securities of the surviving corp that equate to more than 5/6 of the voting power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

CA §1300 Appraisal Rights

A

If s/hs were entitled to vote, each can demand FMV of dissenting shares in cash

  • Market out exception: publicly traded shares
  • Exception to exception: 5%+ of outstanding shares of the class demand appraisal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

CA §2115 Quasi-CA Corps

A

Foreign corp’s articles of incorporation are deemed amended to comply w/ CA law IF:

(1) 50%+ of voting securities are held of record by people with CA addresses; AND
(2) 50%+ of business is in CA (measured by assets, payroll, and sales)

DE cts refuse to apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Internal Affairs Doctrine

A

Only state of incorporation should have auth’y to regulate matters than pertain to the relationships among and between a corp & its officers, directors, and s/hs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Majorities

A

Simple= majority of voted shares

Absolute = majority of shares entitled to vote

Super = established in articles; makes minority vote necessary to approve specified issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

NYSE §312

A

S/h approval is req’d ANY time you issue more than 20% of shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Weinberger Entire Fairness

A

FAIR DEALING = PROCESS
–time constraints, arm’s length negotiations, uninformed votes, concealing superior knowledge

FAIR PRICE = RESULT
–must consider ALL relevant factors EXCEPT “speculative elements of value that may have arisen from the accomplishment or expectations of the merger”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Independent Negotiating Committee

A

Shifts entire fairness burden to π

Must have real bargaining power that it can exercise on an arm’s length basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Change in Control Provisions

A
  • Change in ownership in excess of X%

- Change in X% of bd w/in X time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Exceptions to Non-Assumption of Liability by Asset Purchaser

A

(1) P expressly or impliedly agreed to assume
(2) transaction is a merger
(3) P’s mere continuation of seller
(4) transaction is a fraudulent attempt to evade seller’s liabilities
(5) CA TORT LAW - PRODUCT LINE EXCEPTION
- –π lacks adequate remedy against seller/manufacturer
- –P knows about product risks associated wi/ the line it continues
- –Seller transfers goodwill associated w/ product line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Securities Act of 1933

A
  • Governs an ORIGINAL ISSUANCE of stock
  • Goal: provide sufficient info to investing public when a company issues its own securities
  • MUST REGISTER OR EXEMPTION ANY SECURITY WHEN ISSUED
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Registration Exemptions - Limited Offering

A

504: Offer and sell up to $1MM in any 12 month period to any # or type of investor w/o disclosure req’s
505: Up to $5MM to no more than 35 non-accredited investors and unlimited accredited investors. If ANY nons, must still disclose financial stmts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Registration Exemptions - Private Placement

A

506: Unlimited value to no more than 35 non-accredited investors and unlimited accredited investors, IF the nons are financially sophisticated (possess sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters to evaluate the investment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Accredited Investor

A

“Wealthy, sophisticated person” w/ ANY of the following:

(1) Net worth $1MM+ (excluding house)
(2) Income $200K+ last 2 and next yr
(3) Corp w/ $5MM in assets
(4) Officer or director of issuing company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Securities Act of 1934

A
  • Governs TRADING of public stock already issued

- Must register each transaction, not stock itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

‘34 Act - Periodic Reporting

A 
8-K: anything material, w/in 48 hrs
10-Q: quarterly report
10-K: annual report
14-A: proxy stmt
T-O: tender offer
??: d/o/10% s/h buying, selling w/ 180 days
13-D: acquiring control (5%+)
??: material omission/misrepresentation
32
Q

Proxy Statement

A

Provides FULL and adequate disclosure of all material facts necessary for the s/h to make an informed decision w/ respect to a transaction that req’s s/h approval

33
Q

Rule 10b-5

A
  • Indiv in possession of material inside info must either disclose it to the investing public, or, if unable to disclose, abstain from trading
  • If you change the total mix of info in the marketplace, you have an immediate obligation to correct it
34
Q

Material

A

Information a reasonable investor would deem important in making an investment decision

35
Q

Rule 14e-3

A

Prohibits ANYONE from divulging confidential info about a TO to persons likely to violate rule by trading on the basis of that info

36
Q

Beneficial Owner

A

Person or entity w/ ownership interest in shares currently owned or w/ right to acquire w/in 60 days

–Includes dispositive or voting interest

37
Q

Types of Consideration

A
  • Cash (easy to value, hard to get)
  • Stock (dilution issues, regulations, new owners w/ rights)
  • Debt (frees up cash, OPM, lender restrictions/approvals)
  • Convertibles: ability to transform one kind into another
38
Q

MAC/MAE

A

Any event, occurrence, or development of a state of circumstances or facts which had or reasonably could be expected to have a MAE/MAC on T

Could allow B to walk away, but high burden

39
Q

Baskets

A

Zero Base Claim - once you reach basket, you can claim everything

Deductible Claim - only claim everything over the basket amount

40
Q

Non-Competes

A

Unenforceable in CA except in connection w/ sale of business or significant acquisition

41
Q

Qualifiers

A
  • MAC/MAE
  • Knowledge
  • Basket/cap
  • Collars
42
Q

Williams Act

A

Amendment to ‘34 Act that provides safeguards against “Saturday Night Special” stampedes

43
Q

§13(D)

A
  • When you reach 5% ownership of a public corp, you must disclose w/in 10 days the:
  • -names of buyers, source of funds, price paid, # of shares owned, plans for co if buyer intends to gain control, info about K’s entered into w/ respect to acquired securities

**Includes indivs or acquisition groups

44
Q

§13(E) - Self-TO

A
  • Regulates issuer’s repurchase of its own securities

- All Holders Rule: can’t exclude any holders from transaction

45
Q

§14(d) - 3rd Party TOs

A
  • Schedule 14D-1: B must disclose info relating to B’s identity, source of funds, and plans to merge w/ or make material change in T
  • Schedule 14D-9: T bd must give recommendation & reasons w/in 10 days of commencement
  • Best Price Rule: all tending s/hs get same price
46
Q

§14(E) - Disclosure During TO

A
  • Offer must stay open 20 business days

- Shares must be purchased on pro-rata basis

47
Q

§16(b) - Short Swing Profits

A

To prevent unfair use of inside info, if director, officer, or beneficial owner does a purchase and sale or sale and purchase w/in 180 days of each other, any profit he realizes must be disgorged to the issuer, regardless of intent

Strict liability - no equitable defenses

48
Q

State Anti-Takeover Statutes - 1st Gen

A

Edgar v. MITE Corp
-mandatory waiting period, included foreign corps, had a subjective hearing component

–Directly opposed Williams Act so pre-empted

49
Q

State Anti-Takeover Statutes - 2nd Gen

A

Control Share & Fair Price

CTS Corp v. Dynamics Corp of America

  • IN statute req’d nexus to IN, could be opted out of by IN corps
  • Not pre-empted – state CAN protect s/hs from coercive effects of TOs - Williams is about process, does not give right to or encourage TOs
50
Q

State Anti-Takeover Statutes - 3rd Gen

A

Business Combination Statutes

Amanda Acquisition Corp

  • -WI statute- if B passes threshold, has to wait 3 yrs before merging unless T bd approves in advance
  • -Doesn’t mess w/ process of TO, so no pre-emption

**States CAN discourage TOs, just can’t interfere w/ process once made

51
Q

DE §203

A

Prohibits DE corp from entering into a business combination for 3 yrs after offeror becomes an interest s/h (owns 15%+ of outstanding)

Waiting period waived IF:

(1) prior approval from T bd
(2) single transaction in which B goes from <15 to >85% of voting shares
(3) approval during wait by T bd & 2/3 of outstanding shares not owned by B
(4) T approves a white knight transaction

52
Q

Wellman Test

A

TO Factors:

(1) Active & widespread solicitation of public s/hs
(2) solitcation made for substantial % of issuer’s stock
(3) offer made at premium over prevailing market price
(4) terms are firm & non-negotiable
(5) offer is contingent on tender of fixed # of shares
(6) only open for a limited period of time
(7) offer subjected to pressure to sell stock
(8) public announcements before or w/ rapid accumulation

53
Q

Hanson Trust Rule

A
  • Rejects Wellman Test
  • To determine if TO, look at totality of circ’s - “does there appear a likelihood that, unless the pre-acquisition filing strictures are followed, there will be substantial risk that solicitees will lack info needed to make a carefully considered appraisal of the proposal”
54
Q

Duty of Care

A

Bd is obligated to manage the corp’s business in the manner they reasonably believe to be in the corp’s best interest

CA + DE both allow exculpatory clauses preventing liability for $ damages

55
Q

Business Judgment Rule

A

Presumption that, in decision making, bd acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interest of the corp

Puts burden of showing gross negligence on π

56
Q

Levels of Bad Faith

A

(1) Subjective bad faith
(2) Intentional dereliction of duty - systematic failure to review proposal in accordance w/ business stds
(3) Extreme lack of care

57
Q

Duty of Candor

A

Bd must give s/hs all material info

In DE, it is a constant duty to give info

58
Q

Duty of Loyalty

A

Bd is obligation to make business decisions not tainted by any conflict of interest and to avoid appearances of self-dealing

59
Q

Independent Director

A

Someone able to exercise independent judgment without conflict

60
Q

DoL Rules

A

Squeeze Out Merger = Entire Fairness

Poison Pill = Unocal

61
Q

Proxy Fight

A

Political campaign to win over the hearts and minds of voters

Cts will NOT enforce any plan that interferes w/ this process

62
Q

Defensive Tactics by Targets

A

(1) Staggered/classified bd
(2) No removal of directors without cause
(3) No removal of directors w/o written consent of s/hs
(4) White Knight Rescue
(5) PacMan defense
(6) Self-tender exclusion
(7) Advanced notice bylaw provision

63
Q

Poison Pills

A

Shareholder Rights Plan - once B passes a certain threshold, pill flips & s/hs other than B are issued a set of rights

64
Q

Unocal Rule

A

BJR applies if:

(1) the bd had reasonable grounds for believing that a threat to corp policy & effectiveness existed, AND
(2) the defensive measures taken is a proportionate response to that threat

65
Q

Unocal Threat

A

Bd must show they acted in good faith and conducted a reasonable investigation

66
Q

Unocal Response

A

Proportionate = not draconian = not coercive or preclusive

coercive = force mgr-sponsored alternative on s/hs
preclusive = makes successful proxy contest either mathematically impossible or realistically unattainable
67
Q

Moran

A

Plan, redemption, and refusal to redeem all must satisfy Unocal rule, regardless of how independent the bd is, because of the “specter of self-interest”

68
Q

Quickturn Design Systems

A

New bd must have FULL power to manage & direct the business and affairs of the corp

Cannot contractually write off fiduciary duties

69
Q

Air Products v. Airgas

A

Under DE law, inadequate price alone is a Unocal threat - “Substantive coercion”

Even when are offer is non-coercive, it may represent a threat to s/h interest b/c a bd w/ power to refuse and actively negotiate may be able to obtain a higher value

Bd, not s/h, is responsible for election of time frame for achievement of corp goals

70
Q

Revlon Duties

A

When (1) a sale becomes inevitable, (2) long-term strategy is abandoned in furtherance of a transaction, or (3) process would result in change in control, the bd’s role changes from defenders of corp bastion to auctioneers charged w/ getting the best price for s/hs

71
Q

Lyondell Chemical Co. v. Ryan

A

“There is such a way of acting that is so egregious that it goes beyond care & might be disloyal”

There is no single way to meet Revlon duties - entirely fact and situation specific

72
Q

Deal Protection Devices

A
  • Shark Repellants - staggered bd & supermajority
  • Poison Pills
  • PacMan
  • Lock Ups
  • Termination fee/Liquidated damages
73
Q

Mills v. MacMillian

A

If in Revlon mode, deal protection devices must only be those that confer substantial benefits on s/hs (increase bidding)

74
Q

Ways to Go Private

A

Goal = < 300 s/hs

(1) stock buyback/repurchase
(2) reverse split w/ fraction elimination
(3) acquisition by private co w/o a stock payment
(4) 2 step squeeze out
(5) purchase by indiv

75
Q

Fair Dealing in the Auction Process

A

It is not per se wrong to engage in favoritism, so long as it is geared toward getting the highest possible value

M&A (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions