final Flashcards

1
Q

Charles Borromeo: (1538–1584)

A

Milan reforming Bishop. He established three seminaries, including one devoted to rural clergy, and personally ministered to the poor and sick. The Barnabites order established the church of St. Barnabas in Milan in 1530. They believed in the clerical state and to ministering to the poor and the sick, paved the way for Carlo Borromeo and to assist him. Borromeo, in turn, would spur them to rewrite their rule in the 1570s to bring it more closely in line with the Tridentine decrees. His clergy resisted him (shot him in back story).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ignatius Loyola:

A

the founder of the Jesuit order.

He was originally a Basque noble, but was injured at a 1521 battle in Pamplona during the (French-Spain) Hapsburg-Valois Wars (1494–1559).

He would perfect his introspective meditations and turn his method of discerning God’s will into a detailed process and into a written manual, The Spiritual Exercises.

It repudiated Protestantism: Forget about a human will that can do nothing to earn its salvation, or about justification by faith alone or grace alone. Forget predestination.

He was persecuted by the Spanish Inquisition so he fled to France, Began the Jesuits in 1540. Unlike other orders, the Jesuits had no uniform garb, no fixed prayer times, no communal prayer. They did not engage in extreme fasts or self-mortification. This allowed Jesuits as much flexibility as possible within the world. The Jesuit curriculum taught Renaissance humanism. The Jesuit schools trained civic leaders, entrepreneurs, and functionaries. For Jesuits, distinguishing between “worldly” and “spiritual” subjects was unnecessary. For them, circumstances determined the seriousness of the sin (casuistry). Hospitals ranked high on the Jesuits’ list of priorities—also, ministering to prostitutes. They wrote counter-Protestant texts. In England, Jesuits entered the fray as subversives and as foreign agents, since they had all received their training abroad and had to slip into Elizabeth’s realm in disguise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

“Rules for Thinking with the Church”

A

ST IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA

“We should praise all works of penance, not only those that are interior but also those that are exterior.”

“If we wish to proceed securely in all things, we must hold fast to the following principle: What seems to me white, I will believe black if the hierarchical Church so defines.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

St. Teresa of Ávila (1515–1582).

A

She reformed the Carmelites, an order founded in the twelfth century.

A nun at a convent in Ávila, Spain, Teresa became close with Peter of Alcántara, the leader of the Franciscan Discalced reform. Despite heavy opposition from civil and church authorities, Teresa managed to establish a convent, St. Joseph’s, which was to subsist entirely by begging, and in which the sisters would devote themselves to silent, interior prayer, rather than to vocal or sung prayer on behalf of patrons. Teresa established seventeen new Discalced convents for women in Spain, and a parallel reform among the male Carmelites.

She was a mystic given over to visions and spiritual ecstasies. And it was due to Peter that Teresa began to gain acceptance as a genuine mystic rather than a demonically deceived or insane nun. After Teresa’s death, the female Discalced Carmelites continued growing, expanding into Italy, France, and Flanders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Francis Xavier: (1506–1552)

A

was one of the first Jesuits.

Xavier’s time in Japan was brief, but he planted the seeds for a much larger enterprise. Xavier figured out that the emperor was in a weak position, and he cultivated the support of the local lords, or daimyos.

Despite his limited knowledge of Japanese, he also figured out that the translation of certain basic terms, including God, was highly problematic, and settled on the use of Latin words, such as Deus for “God,” in place of Japanese equivalents. Xavier also figured out that the Japanese had such great admiration for China, and it would be best first to convert the Chinese.

While he was still alive, his letters on mission work, thanks to printing, made missions in general and the Asian missions in particular a significant component of Catholic culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fumi-e:

A

After Xavier left Japan Catholicism grew with the conversion of several local lords (daimyos) in the 1560s and the arrival of even more missionaries. Had the emperor remained weak and the state decentralized, it is highly likely that this growth would have continued.

But in the 1580s Toyotomi Hideyoshi, a daimyo, began to reunify Japan and to centralize power once again. Franciscan, Dominican, and Augustinian missionaries began to arrive, and to promote the Christian faith much less tactfully than the Jesuits, especially among the lower classes. The Spanish presence in the Philippines worried Hideyoshi, who knew that the Spanish were into conquering and ruling, and that all the missionaries on Japanese soil were now subjects of the king of Spain, due to Philip II’s takeover of the Portuguese throne in 1580. He then persecuted and executed a lot of Christians, continued in 1614 by Tokugawa Ieyasu.

In addition to destroying churches and driving missionaries away, Ieyasu’s forces began a brutal process of de-Christianization, He asked everyone to trample on images of Christ and the Virgin Mary. Those who refused to dishonor these icons, known as fumie, would be identified as Christians and subjected to torture, and eventually to execution if they refused to convert. Japanese Catholics survived by becoming “hidden Christians” passing on their faith at home, disguising their rituals as traditional Japanese ceremonies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Matteo Ricci (1552–1610)

A

Jesuit Italian (1552–1610) who went on a mission to China. He was very proficient in mathematics, geography, and astronomy, and would also quickly master classical and colloquial Mandarin Chinese. convinced that if they won over the elites, then the conversion of the masses would eventually follow. They sought to impress the Chinese with Western advances in science and mathematics, so they might drop their prejudice against all things non-Chinese as worthless. Committed to the creation of a native Catholic church in China, they dressed as Buddhist monks. Ricci looked for ways of convincing the Chinese that their most cherished beliefs were not antithetical to Christianity, but rather highly compatible, even brought to perfection by Christian theology, ethics, and philosophy. Such a deliberately slow approach was incompatible with the methods employed by most Catholic missionaries at that time, which were designed to win converts quickly. He wrote The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven which sought to prove the conformity of natural reason with the law of the Christian God and with the ancient sages of China. Ricci made it possible for Christian missions to be tolerated.

In 1705, Rome proclaimed all rites concerning ancestors incompatible with the Catholic faith and therefore forbidden. This decision eventually led the Chinese emperor to outlaw Christianity everywhere but Beijing and to ban all Christian missions from the provinces in 1721.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Laws of Burgos

A

The Dominicans convinced King Ferdinand to enact a new set of regulations for the colonists, in 1512. The Laws of Burgos set strict guidelines for the treatment of the natives of the Indies, seeking to protect them from abuse and ensure their conversion to Christianity. It outlawed the direct punishment of natives by anyone other than an appointed official, set limits on the amount of work they could do, required they be provided with adequate food and housing, and ordered that all of them be instructed in the Christian faith.

It enacted the encomienda, a land-grant system that gave colonists the right to exploit a limited number of natives (no fewer than 40 and no more than 150), according to the size of the property allotted to them. In exchange for their labor, the encomendero who owned the land was made responsible for their well-being and their catechization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bartolomé de las Casas (1484–1566)

A

a Dominican friar, he wrote a Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies. an early settler of Hispaniola, the embodiment of the Christian conscience in the early Spanish colonial enterprise. He showed the negative effect the violence had on mission efforts. His pressure helped bring about the Law of Burgos, and was against the Requerimiento, which, while it promised that no one would be compelled to convert, simultaneously required that all be subjected to religious instruction in the Christian faith.
Valladolid, Spain, in 1550 debate: On the side of the natives, Dominicans defended their full humanity. Bartolomé de Las Casas was backed by some formidable theologians known collectively as “the school of Salamanca.”

On the side of those colonists who thought the natives were a race apart, Juan Ginés de Sepúlved argued that the natives of the Indies were “natural slaves.” Out of Aristotle’s Politics, which proposed that there were indeed human beings whose intellect was so limited that they could do “nothing better” than “to use their body.”

The natives were fully human, yes, argued Las Casas, but their culture was at a far lower stage of development than that of their conquerors. The crown should defend their full human rights, but at the very same time govern them for their own good. Because of this the Church decided there would be no native priests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

María de Jesús de Ágreda: (1602–1665)

A

another noncanonized mystic—claimed not only to have constant contact with the Virgin Mary, but also to have served as her scribe, for the Mother of God supposedly dictated her biography to her. There was a renewed emphasis on the unwavering constancy of the miraculous in the Catholic Church. Sister Maria de Ágreda was reported to have levitated. Even more remarkable was the claim that this same nun had visited North America many times without ever leaving her convent in Ágreda, Spain, and that she had evangelized the natives of West Texas and New Mexico.

Holy people were expected to have intimate contact with the divine, through apparitions of Jesus, the Virgin Mary, or other saints in heaven, who sometimes had messages they wanted delivered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Peter Canisius (1521–1597)

A

Dutch Jesuit.

His catechism, Summa Doctrinae Christianae (1555), was intended for advanced students. It was later revised and appeared in two shorter versions, one of intermediate length for less advanced students and an even shorter version for young children. The intermediate Catechismus Minor was rapidly translated into every major European vernacular and reprinted constantly for generations, its polemical use earned Canisius the title “Hammer of Heretics.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Piarists and Ursulines

A

Founded in 1535 by St. Angela de Merici (1474–1540) in Italy, the Ursulines were the very first religious order for women dedicated to teaching. Eventually, they would also reach some of its overseas colonies. In 1639, for instance, the first convent for women in North America would be established, in New France. The Ursulines excelled at their teaching ministry, because they fulfilled a very modern need: that of educating the daughters of the rising urban bourgeoisie and of ensuring that they were properly instructed in Christian doctrine and morals. The Council of Trent had declared it preferable for religious women to be cloistered and given over to a contemplative life, but the Ursulines excelled at the active life amid the harsh realities of the “world,”

Joseph (José) de Calasanz (1556–1648), founded an order dedicated to educating disadvantaged children known as Piarists, the priests took an additional vow, committing themselves to a teaching ministry. This school aimed the uplifting of an entire social class. Joseph’s pupils also were taught all the basic academic subjects in their own language, rather than in Latin, with an emphasis on pragmatic skills that could prepare them for work. the Piarists made many powerful enemies by supporting Galileo Galilei and by teaching his radically new heliocentric theory in their schools. Then, in 1646, their superior general was exposed as a sexual predator who also created a network of pederasts. Then all of its priests were placed under the authority of their local bishops. But the Piarists and their schools were too useful to discard. They would reemerge again full of vigor, ready to conquer new mission fields. The schools spread all over the world, helped keep Poland Catholic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Eudists

A

a dynamic French reformer was Jean Eudes (1601– 1680). He established a seminary at Caen. Following the Oratorian paradigm, those who joined this congregation took no vows and remained under the jurisdiction of their bishops. They also devoted themselves to the training of secular priests. Some of these seminaries concentrated on training poor students for rural ministries. The Eudists focused on creating a more devout laity, placing great emphasis on reaching out to the fallen and downtrodden.

An indefatigable preacher, Jean Eudes led the way by conducting more than a hundred preaching missions himself, and publishing several devotional texts. Eudes also played an instrumental role in the founding of other religious communities devoted to serving the needy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Augsburg Interim:

A

After the defeat of the Lutheran princes by Emperor Charles V in 1547, Charles V attempted to impose the Augsburg Interim on their lands in 1548.

Convinced that he could effect a reconciliation between Rome and Lutheran Germany, Charles V tried to work out a compromise that would allow his Lutheran subjects to return to the Catholic fold without abandoning their religious convictions. The Augsburg Interim required Luterans to accept the authority of the pope, to reinstate bishops, to accept seven sacraments, and to return to Catholic rituals and practices. They also had to accept Catholic teachings they had rejected, such as transubstantiation and saintly intercession, and to abandon sola scriptura and sola fide.

Pope Paul III viewed the interim as a challenge to his own authority and at first refused to approve it. Catholic princes tended to reject it too, on the grounds that it served only to give the emperor more authority over them. On the Lutheran side, many rulers and pastors rejected the interim outright and refused to obey it. Melanchthon produced his own “interim”; the Leipzig Interim held firm on theological issues, but allowing for concessions on issues of ritual and practice, arguing that some rites were “indifferent” or nonessential (termed adiaphora). The who sided with Melanchthon, who came to be known as Philippists, and those who opposed him called themselves Gnesio-Lutherans, or “genuine” Lutherans. Nothing came of the accord because of the Rebellion of the Princes against Charles V that ended in 1552 when Charles lost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Adiaphora

A

Melanchthon’s Leipzig Interim defended core Lutheran beliefs, but allowing for concessions on issues of ritual and practice, arguing that some rites were “indifferent” or nonessential (termed adiaphora), that is, insufficiently significant to stand in the way of union between Lutherans and Catholics. Adiaphora was the reinstatement of bishops, or the sacraments of confirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Magdeburg Confession:

A

A Lutheran statement of faith designed by Gnesio-Lutherans as an alternative to the Leipzig Interim and Augsburg Interim. It said that Lutherans were opposed to following Charles V’s imperial law and were prepared to resist its implementation with force if necessary. They justified this by saying that when subordinate powers within a state (religious institutions) were faced with the situation where the “supreme power” is working to destroy true religion, they may go further than non-cooperation with the supreme power and assist the faithful to resist. The Calvinist tradition also mirrored this justification of violent resistance theory when Beza wrote “On the Rights of Magistrates.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Peace of Augsburg:

A

In April 1552, the inconstant Moritz of Saxony switched sides again, allied himself with King Henry II of France, secretly assembled a large army, and pounced on Charles V, who was once again busy preparing to fight France. The Lutherans won this Rebellion of the Princes. The 1555 peace treaty marked the end of religious warfare in Germany, for the following sixty years or so. The question of religion was left entirely in the hands of local rulers. The Latin formula devised to describe the new status quo was simple enough: cuius regio, eius religio., “Religion belongs to the ruler.” Ultimately, the Peace of Augsburg diminished the emperor’s power and augmented the independence of each of the three hundred states within the empire’s chaotic map. This created an uneasy truce that rested on a political and military stalemate, which would cost them dearly during the Thirty Years’ War,

The Peace of Augsburg, also called the Augsburg Settlement, was a treaty between Charles V and the forces of the Schmalkaldic League, an alliance of Lutheran princes, on September 25, 1555, at the imperial city of Augsburg, in present-day Bavaria, Germany. It officially ended the religious struggle between the two groups and made the legal division of Christendom permanent within the Holy Roman Empire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Formula of Concord:

A

While the Philippists tended to favor a political solution in which the princes and civil magistrates would impose a settlement on all Lutherans, the Gnesio Lutherans insisted on arriving at a very detailed list of true beliefs and specific condemnations of the the Philippists. In 1580 the Solid Declaration of the Formula of Concord agreement was widely circulated and eventually accepted by principalities and imperial free cities, and enforced through the principle of cuius regio, eius religio. The Philippists thus lost. All twelve articles affirmed Gnesio-Lutheran positions: the total depravity of human nature, salvation by grace alone, the real presence of Christ in the eucharist, the necessity of shunning certain Catholic rites. Because of their desire to compromise, the Philippists could be more easily worn down. Though the Formula was widely accepted, the growing presence of Calvinists in Germany made eucharistic controversies continue. The Scandinavian kingdoms did not accept it either.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Edict of Nantes:

A

After Francis I persecution of Protestants, Huguenot churches grew in the 1550s, under Henry II. By 1560, thanks in large measure to the efforts of John Calvin and the exile community in Geneva, France had been flooded with Protestant texts and with well-trained missionaries. Huguenots, were very well organized, and disproportionately composed the professional elites and nobility. There were nine separate wars between 1562 and 1598 between the two sides. There was a collapse of central authority in France in which a succession of powerful nobles financed their armies with tax revenues. It ended when King Henry IV abjured his Huguenot faith and joined the Catholic Church to become the undisputed king of France. In April 1598 he proclaimed the Edict of Nantes, which granted legal toleration to the Huguenots, restored their civil rights, including the right to establish their own church and worship as they saw fit, and the right to work for the state or in any profession. It also gave them the right to petition the king directly.

The edict was a limited compromise. It reaffirmed the Roman Catholic Church as the official religion of France, and made no mention of any other religious minorities. It also required everyone in the realm to pay a tithe to the Catholic Church, placed restrictions on intermarriage, and placed geographical boundaries on the Reformed Church. Louis XIV (r. 1643–1715) however revoked the edict in 1685 and renewed persecution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Dutch Revolt/Eighty Years’ War

A

In 1549 the Netherlands passed into the hands of the Hapsburg monarchs of Spain. (see all of Philip’s policies below). Calvinism made great inroads into the Netherlands. In 1565 bad weather led to a devastatingly poor harvest–the “Hunger Year”. King Philip did little to alleviate the situation. Calvinist ministers stirred up animosity toward the “idols” and rituals of the Catholic Church. Mobs numbering in the thousands began to ransack churches and monasteries. William of Orange proved himself a very able military leader, and a Calvinist hero too, despite a somewhat ambivalent approach to religion. He convinced the ten Catholic provinces of the south to overlook religious differences and join the Calvinists. England entered on behalf of the Dutch. For the Netherlanders, the war was one of attrition rather than victory. The fighting resumed as part of the Thirty Years’ War. By 1648, the Republic of the Netherlands, then known as the United Provinces, would be the most tolerant place in all of Europe.

21
Q

Philip II:

A

Son of Charles V, he was given possession including the New World, southern Italy, and the Low Countries. Reared in Spain, and culturally, linguistically, and temperamentally alienated from the Netherlanders. He increased taxes and tried to bypass the nobility and the Netherlandish parliament (the Estates States General), by appointing wealthy and powerful men he trusted as governors of each province.

King Philip also decided to redraw the ecclesiastical map of the Netherlands, to create new archbishoprics and new bishoprics. The Inquisition in the Netherlands also gained traction. In 1565 bad weather led to a devastatingly poor harvest, the “Hunger Year” to 1566. Philip did little to alleviate the situation. Philip II invested much of the wealth extracted from the New World into the Dutch war because he thought the Dutch had to be vanquished for the sake of the honor of Spain and of God.

22
Q

Janneken Munstdorp:

“Testament to Her Infant Daughter”

A

Anabaptist that was burned at the stake in 1573 in Antwerp, Belgium. Catholic Antwerp put an inquisition on Protestants and the Anabaptist brotherhood, which, contrary to the Calvinist community, could not fall back on an international system of refugee churches.

Janneken was pregnant when she was arrested and in prison gave birth. The baby was secretly given to “friends,” i.e., members of the congregation, to bring her up, To her little daughter she wrote that they had been married only a short while when the martyr’s death for the Lord’s sake overtook them; she should not be ashamed of them, but follow them and live a godly life. The mother could give her a good name; she should be industrious and good and fear God. She affectionately urges her parents to seek their salvation.

23
Q

Arminianism:

A

After Calvin’s death, under Théodore de Bèze from 1564 until 1605, Calvinists grew in number and the Swiss Reformed were increasingly eclipsed. Whereas the Swiss affirmed single predestination (that God merely predestines those to be saved), the Calvinists insisted on double predestination (that God predestines who will be saved and who will be damned). The Swiss, faithful to long-standing civic traditions, insisted that the civil magistracy should manage the church; the Calvinists preferred to grant the church more independence.

Calvinist Jacob Arminius (1560–1609), gave a milder interpretation of predestination that gave the human will some role to play and affirmed that Christ had thus died for all humans, not just for the elect. In 1610, his followers wrote The Remonstrance, which earned them the name of Remonstrants. With five succinct points, the Remonstrants emphasized human responsibility as much as divine grace. In 1619, at the Synod of Dordrecht (known as Dort in English), the Counter-Remonstrants condemned Arminianism and affirmed double predestination. Among Puritans, Arminianism was despised. Both King Charles I and William Laud, archbishop of Canterbury were Arminians, and the crown wanted to impose Arminianism. Resistance to Arminianism can be counted among the many causal factors of the English Civil War.

24
Q

Heidelberg Catechism (V2)

A

Under Bèze, new centers of Calvinist learning were established.

The German principality of the Palatinate and its rulers were committed to the Calvinist cause by taking in refugees and supporting the University of Heidelberg.

It produced the Heidelberg Catechism in 1563. Its summary of Reformed Calvinist faith and doctrine would prove immensely influential beyond Germany, and shape international Calvinism for centuries to come. It was endorsed at the Synod of Dort.

Protestant confessional document taking the form of a series of questions and answers…

25
Q

Synod of Dort

A

In 1619, at the Synod of Dordrecht (known as Dort in English), the Counter-Remonstrants condemned Arminianism and affirmed double predestination.

Five-Point Calvinism: the human is so corrupted by original sin, it cannot avoid sinning

  • Unconditional election—humans can do nothing to earn salvation: it is all up to God Limited atonement—
  • Christ’s redemptive act applies only to the elect
  • Irresistible grace—those chosen by God cannot refuse his grace Perseverance of the saints—the elect cannot lose their salvation

Not all Calvinists accepted the Synod of Dort or its endorsement of the Heidelberg Catechism. Condemned by the synod, the Dutch Remonstrants had no choice but to create their own church. Five Point Calvinism, was adopted by the Church of Scotland and Presbyterians and Congregationalists in England and America.

26
Q

Francis de Sales

A

St. Francis was appointed provost of the cathedral chapter of Geneva in 1593. He set out to convert the Calvinists who lived in his diocese through preaching. He managed to reclaim many lapsed Catholics, and his spellbinding sermons were, in fact, very well attended, and then published, becoming best sellers for an eager Catholic audience. We also know that by the 1620s, Catholic preachers in the mold of St. Francis de Sales were fanning out in all directions, carrying out urban and rural missions

27
Q

Anna Maria van Schurmann: (1607-1678)

A

She was a very learned woman for her time, a Dutch polymath. She had a conversion experience, eschewed her learning, and later joined the Jean Labadie’s spiritual-pietist sect, which favored ethical living, the spirit of God’s presence for an individual, and reading the Bible in groups. Her attachment to these pietist ideas of inner regeneration and ethical loving were a response to what many deemed to be the dead, dry preaching of the age, a result of the onset of Protestant orthodoxy/scholasticism. She favored feeling and experience of God over dogmatic beliefs.

28
Q

Confraternities:

A

Lay associations that devoted themselves to specific devotions and acts of charity, such as the running of hospitals, almshouses, orphanages, and rehabilitation centers for former prostitutes.

Wherever Protestants disbanded confraternities, they also wiped out much of the local charitable infrastructure, which they then redesigned and placed in the hands of civil authorities, to be funded by compulsory taxes. Under the Catholic Council of Trent, confraternities were brought more directly under clerical control, and integrated more fully into parish life. In places where Protestantism had made inroads, confraternities could play a pivotal role in reestablishing Catholic piety and defining a new Catholic identity. When King Philip II of Spain attempted to turn over some of the philanthropic activities of confraternities to civil authorities, and to fund them through taxes instead, the confraternities rose in protest and made him abandon that plan.

29
Q

Almsgiving

A

Catholic tradition of dealing with poverty. The demands of Christian charity made the needy everyone’s concern. Almsgiving was a salvific act, which earned one merit. The poor, therefore, had a sacred dimension and were instruments of redemption. Alternatively, Karlstadt insisted that the giving of alms was not at all a salvific gesture and that the needy were not agents of salvation who presented the faithful with an opportunity to score points with God, but rather a problem that Christians were required to solve. Catholics tended to sacralize charity to encourage interaction between donor and recipient, and to fund it through privatized almsgiving.

30
Q

Elizabethan Poor Laws

A

Protestants tended to establish a centralized system that was run by civil authorities rather than by churches, confraternities, or individual donors. On the whole, the Protestant solution rested on removing the individual citizen or Christian from the process of poor relief, and in sundering all direct connections between donors and the needy. Begging was abolished in most Protestant localities, and as a result, anyone who claimed to need assistance would have to be certified as genuinely needy by the municipal agency that was in charge of poor relief. Charity became strictly local, and also desacralized. This can be seen in England’s “1601 Act for Relief of Poor, which formalized poor relief as either indoor or outdoor relief, thought about specific kinds of relief for the elderly or the sick, even those who would only be out of work for a short while.

31
Q

Puritans

A

Intent on cleansing the Anglican Church from all traces of popery, Puritans were intellectual and spiritual heirs of John Calvin, gained considerable momentum throughout the reigns of Elizabeth and James I.

When people were upset with King James’ autocratic rule, more subjects joined the Puritan cause, especially after he removed many Puritan clergy. some argued that the Church of England had to be reformed from within and others at the other extreme claiming that genuine reform required separation from that church. Some Puritans went into exile to escape persecution, especially to the Netherlands and Calvinist areas of Germany and America. Puritans thought that the Church of England and the Book of Common Prayer were “popish.” King Charles raised an army of loyalists, who would come to be known as Cavaliers. The Puritans raised their own army in response, and would come to be known as the Roundheads. Having defeated the king, the Puritans became divided between conservative Presbyterians, Independents, and radical puritans like the apocalyptic social egalitarianisms. Cromwell defeated the Presbyterians, took over Parliament, ejected all who did not agree with him and the Independents (Pride’s Purge). The Independents preferred to allow the existence of multiple autonomous churches with purely voluntary membership. They advocated for redefinition of the powers of the monarchy and Parliament so that both would be more responsive to the voice of the people. In 1660 the Puritan Commonwealth was replaced once again by a monarchy.

32
Q

James VI / I: 1566-1625

A

King James VI of Scotland became King of England in 1603, presented with the Millenary Petition, a list of requests signed by Puritans who requested genuine change in the Anglican Church, but he met few of the demands. He however sponsored the English translation of the Bible, known as the King James Version. King James defended the Anglican status quo. “No bishops, no king,” he insisted, in defense of the episcopal polity of the Church of England. An advocate of the divine right of kings, and ever distrustful of Parliament, he died in 1625. When people were upset with King James’ autocratic rule, more and more of his subjects joined the Puritan cause, especially after he removed many Puritan clergy from their posts.

33
Q

Charles I 1600-1649:

A

Heir of James I. dismissive of Parliament and enamored of the rites that Puritans condemned as “popery.” He always asked Parliament for money, but hated them. He asked William Laud (1573–1645), the archbishop of Canterbury, to impose a uniformity on English worship that many found uncomfortably close to Catholicism. He tried to impose high Anglican worship on the Calvinist Scots in 1638. The Scots rebelled, the First Bishops’ War (1639–1640) bankrupted King Charles and Scottish Parliament abolished bishops and declared the Scottish Kirk free of royal control. The so-called English Long Parliament that assembled in 1640 (and would technically remain in session until 1653) immediately set itself to claiming unprecedented powers, removing the king’s chief ministers from power, rearranging the councils that ran the government, impeaching Archbishop Laud for treason, and legislating other changes that diminished the king’s authority. Ultimately, the disagreements between Parliament and King Charles would lead to civil war. In 1646, King Charles himself was captured by Cromwell’s Roundheads and imprisoned. He was beheaded in 1649.

34
Q

William Laud: (1573–1645)

A

the archbishop of Canterbury, who was committed to imposing a uniformity on English worship that many found uncomfortably close to Catholicism. Archbishop Laud’s love of “high” ritual—which included the use of elaborate vestments, incense, bells, and candles—was offensive to many in England, and totally unacceptable in Calvinist Scotland. Their fatal mistake was to try to impose high Anglican worship on the Calvinist Scots in 1638. The Scots rebelled immediately. the First Bishops’ War (1639–1640). The Long Parliament impeached Archbishop Laud for treason.

35
Q

National Covenant, 1638

A

Charles I and William Laud tried to impose high Anglican worship on the Calvinist Scots in 1638. The Scots rebelled, swearing to uphold their religious and civil liberties, inspired by John Knox. Their parliament enacted a Covenant which rejected English “innovations” in religion. Although it emphasized Scotland’s loyalty to the King, the Covenant also implied that any moves towards Roman Catholicism would not be tolerated. The fighting that ensued in 1639, which came to be known as (1639–1640), bankrupted King Charles and further emboldened the Scots, whose Parliament abolished bishops and declared the Scottish Kirk free of royal control. Unable to raise or fund an army, Charles called Parliament to grant him the means of doing so in March 1640, but since many of its members were Puritans, they refused and he disbanded. Left without the means to pay for an army, King Charles soon found himself facing a Scottish invasion. Left with no choice after the Second Bishops’ War, Charles summoned Parliament again, and sparked a revolution.

36
Q

New Model Army:

A

One of the chief reasons for the eventual triumph of the Roundheads was Oliver Cromwell (1599–1658), who molded the rebel army into a disciplined and highly effective fighting force. The Puritans controlled London and most of the heavily populated southern half of England, along with Parliament, which could levy taxes to support their cause. Cromwell’s men, who recited the psalms as they went into battle and considered themselves God’s elect, identified with the ancient Israelites. Having subdued Ireland, Cromwell turned to Scotland, which he and his New Model Army invaded and occupied in 1650–1651. As in Ireland, the pretext was the possible treachery of those who backed the monarchy and supported the claims of the dead king’s son and heir, Charles II, who was in exile on the Continent. The net result was the subjugation of Scotland to England and the creation of a single political entity in the British Isles.

37
Q

Presbyterians:

A

The most conservative Puritans were the Presbyterians, who wanted England to have a church like that of Scotland and Geneva, with no bishops. They also favored retaining the monarchy, along with a vigorous Parliament to keep it in check. Of the three factions, the Presbyterians had the highest representation in Parliament.

The second faction, the Independents preferred to allow the existence of multiple autonomous churches with purely voluntary membership. They advocated for redefinition of the powers of the monarchy and Parliament so that both would be more responsive to the voice of the people.

Oliver Cromwell and most of his army officers were Independents. The Presbyterians attempted a coup in 1648, to restore the captive king to power, but Cromwell quickly and decisively trounced them, entered London, and took over Parliament, ejecting all who did not agree with him and the Independents (Pride’s Purge).

38
Q

Menocchio

A

an Itallian Miller. He was tried by the inquisition for his unorthodox religious views, and burnt at the stake for heresy in 1599.

During his trial, he argued that the only sin was to harm one’s neighbor and that to blaspheme caused no harm to anyone but the blasphemer. He went so far as to say that Jesus was born of man and Mary was not a virgin, that the Pope had no power given to him from God but simply exemplified the qualities of a good man, and that Christ had not died to “redeem humanity”. He describes sacraments and practices of the Church as just “business”. He thought that God did not create the world, but spontaneously emerged from crude matter (worm, cheese). This is how God and all the angels emerged, out of matter.

(Ginzburg was among the pioneers of “microhistory“, a type of social history which focusses attention on detailing what we can known about one particular individual, family or village, for instance.) He was convinced that the universe had come into existence from some preexisting eternal matter, rather than out of nothing, as the church taught.

39
Q

Malleus Maleficarum

A

Witchcraft was evil-making that required very intimate relations with the devil. The notion that sorcerers belonged to an organized satanic cult increased in popularity, especially among the learned. The Malleus Maleficarum (Hammer of Witches), attributed to Heinrich Kramer (1430–1505) and Jacob Sprenger (1436–1495), two Dominican inquisitors who had prosecuted witches and were commissioned directly by Pope Innocent VIII to write a book on witchcraft. It would teach many an inquisitor and magistrate how to identify, prosecute, and convict witches. It thought most of those involved in satanic maleficium were women, and that “all witchcraft came from carnal lust.” The factual claims of the Malleus concerning the power of witches made it relatively easy to try anyone for witchcraft. The evidence needed to convict someone for the crime of maleficium tended to be purely circumstantial. One of the purposes of the book was to refute skeptics who denied the existence of witchcraft and stood in the way of its prosecution. By the late 1550s, as the era of orthodoxy/social disciplining dawned, persecutions intensified, so—more witch hunts!

40
Q

Johann Weyer: (1515–1588)

A

the first major challenge to witch hunting came from a Protestant physician. Witches were actually wretched melancholics who were mentally ill. Consequently, he argued, to persecute witches was not only wrong, but unnecessary, illegal, and illogical because their alleged crimes had not actually taken place. Weyer opposed the use of torture, and especially the extraction of confessions. The real solution to the problem of witchcraft, as he saw it, lay in treating the madness of the accused rather than in killing them. He wrote “On Witches” in 1577. Weyer’s books enjoyed a fairly wide circulation, but had no discernible effect on witch hunting.

41
Q

Thirty Years’ War:

A

in 1618 there was some initial conflict about Bohemia’s relation to Hapsburg authority, but the alliances that had been made turned this local dispute into a destructive war. The Defenestration of Prague- when two representatives of the Holy Roman Emperor were tossed out of a high castle window, seen as anti-Hapsburg, anti-re-Catholicization.

When HRE died, and there was a dispute between Frederick V, the Calvinist leader of the Evangelical Union and the Catholic King Ferdinand of Bohemia to be the next Holy Roman Emperor. With Frederick V was defeated, Catholic Ferdinand II seemed unstoppable, so a new Protestant League was formed that linked a number of German states with Denmark, England, and the Netherlands.

King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden also entered, but was then killed, so it took a Catholic, Louis XIII of France, who could not abide the thought of a strong Hapsburg Empire to sway the tide. The Thirty Years’ War was the first modern military conflict to involve so many nations and to affect civilian populations directly, as enormous armies moved across the landscape without sufficient provisions, living off the reserves of the unfortunate natives they encountered.

42
Q

Peace of Westphalia:

A

The 30 years war finally came to an end with the signing of the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. This settlement recognized the independence of the Republic of the Netherlands and Switzerland. It granted the individual states within the Holy Roman Empire the right to make treaties and alliances of their own, further enhancing the fragmentation of Germany and diminishing the authority of the emperor. As far as religion was concerned, the Peace of Westphalia not only reinforced the cuius regio, eius religio settlement of the Peace of Augsburg, sealing the religious division of Germany, but also acknowledged the legitimacy of Calvinists.

43
Q

Jansenism

A

Cornelius Jansen (1585–1638), a Dutch theologian wrote an immensely detailed refutation of the errors he perceived in Molinism (God’s omniscience allows him to know all possible outcomes, so divine predestination is based on God’s foreknowledge of the choices that human beings will, and won’t, make, Spanish Jesuit Molina). In his work Augustinus 1640, he thought the Catholic Church had gone too far in their attempt to combat the teachings of Luther and Calvin on divine grace, so there was too great a role to the human will in the process of salvation. He compared it to Pelagianism, ancient heresy opposed by St. Augustine. Jansen put forward a rigorist ethic that was opposed to Jesuit laxity. It was too cerebral to gain a broad following. The chief opponents of the Augustinus were the Jesuits, who charged that Jansen denigrated the integrity of the human will and denied that salvation was accessible to all humans. In 1705, Pope Clement XI condemned Jansenism outright. In France Louis XIV oppressed it France, but outside France Jansenism proved more resilient. In the Netherlands, where religious toleration was observed, Jansenists formed their own church. In Italy, Jansenism thrived.

44
Q

Augustinianism:

A

Cornelius Jansen (1585–1638), a Dutch theologian wrote an immensely detailed refutation of the errors he perceived in Molinism by drawing on St. Augustine on grace, free will, and predestination. He titled his book Augustinus (1640). Augustine’s central principle concerning the human will: Bereft of grace, humans could not help but sin. Jansen therefore thought that salvation ultimately depended on God’s inscrutable and seemingly predestinating will. Jansenists then argued that to condemn Jansen’s Augustinus was to question the orthodoxy of St. Augustine himself. The Papal Bull condemning the Jansenists chose to sweep much of Augustinian theology under the carpet, without actually condemning Augustine, but in doing so it both alienated many in the Catholic Church and gave them firm ground to stand upon as dissidents.

45
Q

Pascal’s Wager (1623–1662)

A

Blaise Pascal, mathematician, scientist, inventor, and philosopher. in 1657 Pascal published The Provincial Letters, which publicized the Jansenist cause. He thought that Jesuits seemed more interested in helping sinners be comfortable with their sins rather than in effecting genuine remorse and conversion. He died before he could finish the Pensées, or “Thoughts.” It reveals how threatened Christian intellectuals could feel by the attacks of deists, skeptics, cynics, libertines, and rationalists.

Bet on the existence of God, he proposed to rationalists, for you have nothing to lose, and much to gain if he does exist. If you assume that God exists and commit yourself to the virtuous life, and if it turns out that he does not exist after all, then you will have lived a virtuous life. That, in and of itself, was a life worth living, a nod to the deists and skeptics who wanted to reduce religion to ethics. If God does exist, however, having wagered on his existence and on the necessity of a virtuous life will bring unimaginable rewards. Conversely, having lived as if God did not exist, ignoring his commandments will be disastrous. Pascal’s wager was a scientist’s response to materialistic rationalism.

46
Q

Toleration

A

Pragmatic toleration required no theology, simply a response to stalemate.

The free imperial city-state of Strassburg is a good example of locally devised, unplanned toleration. The Lutheran community grew, along with Reformed influence from Switzerland, pacifist Anabaptists, and radical millenarians at the other. In 1548, the Augsburg Interim reintroduced the Catholic Mass too. In 1548, Emperor Charles V imposed a new political order on Augsburg, in which Catholics and Protestants were to have equal representation in the city government, although at that time the city was only about 10 percent Catholic. In 1555, the Peace of Augsburg sealed this arrangement by granting equal protection under the law for the beliefs, worship, and property of both Catholics and Protestants. Geneva, the Protestant Rome, was surrounded by Catholics. The United Provinces of the Netherlands had Anabaptists, Catholics, Calvinists, Lutherans, and Jews. De facto toleration in the Dutch Republic was so entrenched by the seventeenth century that being pronounced a heretic by any religious community brought no dire consequences (Spinoza).

47
Q

Principled toleration:

A

Sebastian Castellio (1515–1563) Convinced that Christian love demanded a certain degree of tolerance, and that living a life of compassionate virtue was a far better way to convince others of their errors than to round them up and burn them. Freethinking spiritualists also argued for a cessation of all confessional rivalries and persecutions. Caspar Schwenckfeld thought to wait for God to settle the religious mess of the age because he rejected the establishment of any church. English philosopher John Locke (1632–1704) Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) argued that religious liberty was essential to social harmony for all attempts by the state to force consciences usually led to confrontations and civil unrest. But Locke, an English Protestant, was not willing to extend toleration to Catholics or atheists, because he thought their thoughts were fundamentally opposed to toleration.

48
Q

William Allen, A True, Sincere and Just Defense of English Catholics 1584

A

At Oxford, Catholic resistance was strong, and several recusant heads of colleges were dismissed. William Allen (1532–1594) argued that English Catholics were not traitors at all, but really the best possible subjects the crown could ask for. His argument rested on the assumption that their chief virtue was their religion, which was true and divinely established, unlike that of the crown, which was heretical.
He resigned from Oxford shortly after the accession of Elizabeth, so he could avoid taking the Oath of Supremacy and fled to create an English college across the Channel at Douai.

He helped publish an English translation of the New Testament, aimed specifically at English Catholics, against Protestant points of view, the Douai-Rheims Bible.

According to the canons and decrees of the Council of Trent, published in 1563, Catholics were forbidden to read the Bible in the vernacular on their own. But the Douai-Rheims translation was never condemned, principally because authorities of the Catholic Church understood that the English recusant minority was being constantly exposed to “incorrect” translations anyway.

49
Q

Immanuel Kant, “What is Enlightenment?” (V2) 1784

A

Reared by Pietist parents, Kant would reduce religion to ethics, and ethics to the golden rule of the gospels and the Sermon on the Mount. Though he preferred to call the golden rule the “categorical imperative” and to dissect reason, Kant’s philosophy was a complex rationalist version of the “practical Christianity” dear to Pietists.

Definition of a lack of Enlightenment as people’s inability to think for themselves due not to their lack of intellect, but lack of courage. Kant understands the majority of people to be content to follow the guiding institutions of society, and unable to throw off the yoke of their immaturity due to a lack of resolution to be autonomous. The key to throwing off these chains of mental immaturity is reason.

With freedom, each citizen, especially the clergy, could provide public comment until public insight and public opinion changes the religious institution. Publicly it is in your own self-interest not to assent to a set of beliefs that hinder the development of your reason. It is in man’s interest to surpass those that prevent him from using his own reason. Later generations are not bound by the oaths of preceding generations.