final Flashcards
mass media
- the 20th century was the age of mass media-periforation of mass media, invention of a lot of mass media-esp. electronic
- film and recording industry started late 19th century-but came of age in 20th century
- stage that is still with us
- pervasive
- tv on 8 hrs/day in avg american household-avg american watches 5 hours a day
- most households have >1 TV set
- has played an increasingly central role in ppl’s lives
functions of the mass media
- for individuals and for society
- content functions vs medium functions
- manifest function vs. latent function
- societal functions
- individual functions
functions of the mass media: content functions vs medium functions
-some functions tied to the content of the medium (ex: vote guiding function of newspapers during election time), others tied to the general nature of a medium or the conditions of its use (ex: movies provide place for you to go with a date-content irrelevant)
functions of the mass media: manifest function vs latent function
- obvious, surface, intended functions vs. functions that are hidden, maybe even subconscious
- ex: listening to radio in car for news vs. listening as something to do with husband because relationship troubles, to prevent a fight
functions of the mass media: societal functions
- status conferral
- passing on norms, values, traditions
- narcotizing function
- services political system
- creates a sense of social cohesion/community
- services the economy
functions of the mass media: societal functions: 1. status conferral
-mass media legitimizes status on ideas, people, organizations (if something like global warming is discussed on CBS news, tells people it’s an important issue)
functions of the mass media: societal functions: 2. passing on norms, values, traditions
- the same values-so homogenous society-to everyone
- enforces them as well-especially by exposing deviations from these norms-what happens to people who deviate-crime, cheating
- what is right and wrong in our society-both fiction and nonfiction do this
- sometimes the mass media doles our the punishment itself-tabloids-embarasses manw ho left woman at alter adn went on honeymoon along by “Meet the Jerk” on over
- upholds status quo norms and values-if doesn’t, criticized
functions of the mass media: societal functions: 3. narcotizing function
-negative function-mass media creates a sense of apathy-flood of too much info-rots our brains, fills them with junk-much of mass media superficial, not important-makes us inert, passive
functions of the mass media: societal functions: 4. services political system
-leaders use mass media to put their message out to/communicate with the people-peoples’ choices in elections decided by watching/using mass media-internationally as well, leaders can communicate to other countries by using mass media
functions of the mass media: societal functions: 5. creates a sense of social cohesion/community
- news and even shows like MAS*H, American Idol-communal experience
- by providing us with a common base of knowledge, common interests, common concerns
- in particularly dramatic ways during crises-like 9/11
- TV connects us to other people, don’t want to be alone, scared, anxious-reassuring to know that have news to tell you what’s going on-with familiar faces of anchors-suggests someone in charge-sense of stability
- countertrends-more and more media outlets-variety-some people argue media pushing us apart rather than bringing us together-many more channels-also the internet-millions of sites-people concerned about this cuz people go to places (channels and sites) where they already agree with views-where they’ll hear what they want to hear
- but still brings us together-you may be the only person with an interest or hobby in your community, but through the internet can find people with that same interest or hobby-form online community
functions of the mass media: societal functions: 6. services the economy
- through the business page
- advertising-advertises and produces jobs in the process and supports the media
- e-commerce
functions of the mass media: individual functions
- guide our behavior
- guide our understandings
- develop our self concept
- professional tool
- facilitate social interaction
- substitute for social interaction
- aid in emotional release
- ritualize our lives
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 1. guide our behavior
- what movies we see, who to vote for
- a guide to life
- see how characters behave, build a store of knowledge on how you should behave
- ex: when I dressed like Blair
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 2. guide our understandings
- helps give us a grasp of what the world is like-helps define reality )and influences your behavior, so connected to #1)
- mean-world syndrome: the more TV someone watches, the more likely they are to believe that people will do you wrong, world is a mean and scary place-esp. violent TV-so leads to an understanding of what the world is like (and this can influence your behaviors-so don’t walk alone at night anymore)
- editorial function: helps guide our interpretations of politics
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 3. develop our self concept
- we use the mass media to explore reality, diff people
- some of these people we identify with (identification)-this can help us create concepts about who we are, where we fit into world-especially pay attention to people who are like us-in gender, race, age class
- role models-positive and negative-also important in gender and racial stereotypes-lack of role models for them in mass media
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 4. professional tool
-help you in your career-keep up with your field-can provide guidance, news-teachers get articles online to use in class-linkedin.com
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 5. facilitate social interaction
-gives us things to talk about with others-common ground for convo-TV shows-interact with people online, through their blog, later meet up in person-social networking sites, so social interaction online too, and can cause it to happen in person
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 6. substitute for social interaction
-providing you with vicarious companionship-for socially isolated or shy people-watch TV alone to entertain you, so you don’t feel alone-morning news shows especially effective at this-hosts sit on sofa, morning coffee, look out at you and say “good morning”-feel like you know these people
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 7. aid in emotional release
helps us move from 1 emotional state to another-we often use mass media to do this-very effective, especially music-anxious, use spotify music to help you relax, funny video to make you happy when sad, watch TV when bored
functions of the mass media: individual functions: 8. ritualize our lives
-order and organize and structure our lives-which gives us a sense of security-maybe read newspapers every morning, read book before bed-know what will be doing on those times-organize life around mass media-make sure home tuesday at 8 to watch PLL-changing now, media conforming to our schedules-online, record-but still happens-plan to watch shows you missed during week on sunday afternoon
Storage of Media Content
- most media content is stored
- only a small portion is distributed live without being stored first
- 5 important concepts on the nature and storage of media content
1. longevity
2. capacity
3. portability
4. accessibility
5. reproducibility - quality sacrificed for other things in digital media ((for space/storage/minimizing)
Storage of Media Content: 1. longevity
-how long will it last? cave paintings have lasted for thousands of years-but more recently longevity has been substituted for other factors, like portability or facility or accessibility or easy use-VCR home tape, tape
Storage of Media Content: 2. capacity
-how much can be stored? Books and print media can retain a lot more info than cave paintings-but decay much more quickly-can store even more content on floppy disk or CD or DVD or memory sticks or USBs- miniaturization of content has aided capacity, also aided portability
Storage of Media Content: 3. portability
-how easy is it to move the content around? things much more portable now
Storage of Media Content: 4. accessibility
- how easy is it to access that content? need source of power with electronic things-then access is easy
- standards of devices change over time-making it hard to access stuff from older devices-hard to find VCR to play, VHS cassettes
- modern electronic storage has created more access than ever before as long as have modern technology
Storage of Media Content: 5. reproducibility
- how easily and accurately can you make copies? hard before printing press-scribes rewrote to get copies-so texts changed over time, not identical
- visual media initially had to be copied by hand too until photography
- now with digital media, everything is incredibly easy
how media content is stored has certain ramifications:
-civilizations that favor stone tablets favor centralized system-info in 1 space-papyrus led to decentralization cuz laws and info could be easily distributed-commerce was affected as well-commerce records could be moved-affected trade-recording police brutality, conversation in murder trial-these being used and distributed has social consequences
Movies
- film provides us with a giant mirror-shows ideals of our culture
- appeals to our emotions
- influences our conceptions of reality-like romance
- a visual image is retained on the retina of the eye for a fraction of a second after it’s gone-persistence of vision
- motion pictures series of still images presented to eye in rapid succession- persistence of vision allows them to blend together, seem like moving
- projector invented in 1890s-Thomas Edison and Lumiere Bros
- 1st subject of film: pictoral realism: realistic pictures where movement was emphasized
- 1 min films-saw at arcades
- eventually told stories with sustained narrative-one of the 1st was The Great Train Robbery-10 min.-didn’t think people would stay still for much longer than that
Film-1906-1916:
- Age of Griffith-Birth of a Nation, Intolerance-editing, natural acting, close-ups, symbolic imagery, parallel narratives
- 1st feature length film, 1st film stars, 1st well known directors, 1st movie palaces-birth of Hollywood, films as dynamic art medium, 1st permanent motion picture theater (a nickelodeon), films got longer, more costly, more profitable-film became successful business
move to Hollywood and growth of film
- 1910-MPPC controlled virtually ever aspect of production, distribution, exhibition-limited length of films to 1 reel-blocked actor identification so actors wouldn’t get too much power-people didn’t like this, go independent, move west to Hollywood-cheap land, get away from MPPC, weather
- by 1919, Hollywood established as film universe center-80% films made there-cuz international places had to curtail or shut down during war
- Hollywood absorbed foreign talent
Hollywood in 20s
studio system-grew-movie palaces, star system, westerns, comedies, scandals, subject matter of films was bulgar-major religious groups actively against/protesting Hollywood/the film industry-industry forced to police itself-censor-to avoid gov. censorship
- competition from radio and cars
- sound: The Jazz Singer-1st successful sound film-late 20s-gradual process-by 1930s moved to total sound production-expensive
effects of sound
- some stars didn’t transition
- comedy changed-physical comedy before-verbal comedy after
- people excited about movies-extremely popular-big boost for industry
- diminished film’s popularity abroad-now needed expensive dubbing or subtitles-silent films had been more unviersal
Golden Age of Hollywood
- 1930s-after WWII
- hard times-Great Depression, leading up to the war/the war
- escapist films-musicals, screwball comedies-Busby Berkeley films
- patriotic war films
- golden age of studio system-7 dominant film studios-MGM, RKO, WB, Paramount, 20th Century Fox, Universal, Columbia-each had own stars and styles
- by early 1940s, avg. household going to movies 2.5x a week-movies incredibly popular
Post WWII decline of film
- rise of TV caused decline of film-film attendance fell by more than 50% in 50s-1/3 movie theaters closed
- red scare-Mccarthyism-thought communists in media (as media industry was usually more liberal)-went to film to root them out-question them in HUAC-blacklisted in industry if labelled communist, so lost a lot of talent, esp. writers-also chilling effect-people afraid of being branded a communist-influenced content of film
- Paramount Decree-Paramount brought into court for restraint of trade case-ruled that the 7 big studios formed an oligopoly-controlled film industry-vertical integration-had to give up 1 aspect-chose exhibition-sold movie theaters
- foreign film-strong int. film movement formed, giving Hollywood competititon
response to post WWII decline of film
- with attendance going down, industry worried-frantically responded-they tried to improve product (stereophonic sound, revamped movie theaters with bigger screens/cinemascope, ploys like 3D), ordered actors in film to stay out of TV-refused to acknowledge things had changed-TV now biggest mass media
- “the spectacle film”-reaction to TV-focused on epics on wide screens to distinguish themselves from TV-ex: Cleopatra-expensive failure-many studios approached bankruptcy-led to takeover of Hollywood by non-Hollywood business interests-huge corporations from other fields-even more interested in money rather than creative aspects
United Artists
-revamped in early 50s to again provide distribution for indie films-gave new hope to independent filmmakers-set down roots for new kind of film
Film 60s-early 70s
- time of great change in America and in film industry-socially relevant films, freedom of expression-new audiences, new films for them-more arty, experimental
- ex: Easy Rider-convinces studios that these types of films (social commentary) could be very successful-broke many of Hollywood’s rules-no stars-cheap-so studios followed
- this didn’t last very long-particularly as studios increasingly taken over by corporations-studied who going to films-real money to be made with youth audience-16-30 year olds made up 3/4 of film audience-to attract them, studios tried youth-oriented films-disaster films-then people got tired of that-then 2 wildly successful films in mid 70s that led to a new trend-Star Wars and Jaws-blockbuster trend-wildly successful films that people saw multiple times-most released in summer
- changed nature and aesthetic of American movies-from plot and character driven to sensation driven-for young people and foreign markets-they can get indie films from own country, can only get these spectacles from Hollywood-don’t need to understand language
- heavy emphasis on sequels-to optimize money made-also prequels, remakes, reboots (telling the original story in a new way/take, usually with a new cast-reboot refers to a series of films whereas a remake is 1)-none of these as risky as putting out a new original film-all these strategies to minimize risk-sometimes sequels do better than original starting in 80s (would make 2/3 original profit before that), so use of sequels only grew-also films based on content from another medium-based on video game, book, comic book, games, toys, TV show-bring in fans of the story from other mediums-easier to make films based one earlier content-familiarity-easier way to make money more quickly-budgets and profits grew and grew
- became much more difficult to make personal and offbeat films under studios
Film-money
- budgets so high that risk high, movies couldn’t fail
- studios join with other studios to finance films
- financing more global
- the more movies cost, the more they have to appeal to everyone-the lowest common denominator-more people can relate to-aim low, so everyone can understand-less intelligence, creativity-wide and shallow films
- cash break 0
- all related to super concentration on bottom line-when corporations took over Hollywood
Film-Actors
- their power has led to them making more money-made deals to get cut of profits-not just upfront money like before
- why are they paid so much? important to open a movie strong-1st weekend-big actors help this
- Hollywood not as dependent on actors as used to be-can use concept or character or book now to draw in audience-salaries in decline
- DVD sales have shrunk
- younger viewers of movies not going to see movies as much as before
- stars now forgo big upfront and no longer get cut of profits of first run-CB0-cast break zero-stars collect share of profits but only after studio has broken even
Internatonal audience
- Hollywood relying more and more on this market
- American films dominant worldwide
- actors get paid a lot if big international stars
- why have more and more international stars in fils coming out of Hollywood-Jackie Chan
- action films powerful internationally-boys with toys travel-big guy with big gun killing people enjoyed worldwide-minimal subtitles cuz not dialogue based-flashy visuals and special effects transcend cultural differences, more physical comedy works better
- international markets growing-China
- American dominance around globe decreasing somewhat but still dominant
- sometimes films flop in US but still successful if do well overseas
- goal for studios is to have films go worldwide
Jaws
- used a new release pattern
- before, would open in NY and LA-then 2nd tier cities, 3rd-can take a year to make it to a small town-still do sometimes but faster
- Jaws: high profile nation-wide release-750 theaters on same day
- distribution and advertising campaign-nationwide-especially on thursday before movie opened
Film now (in comparison to Golden Age)
- concentration on bottom line now, making money-especially cuz of conglomerization
- films based on other content-sequels-lowest risk
- importance of international audience
- studio heads had most power in Golden Age, but now not as important as used to be, with corporate owners
- agents have more power than they used to
- actors used to be on contract with 1 studio, told which films they’d do-but after Golden Age, actors more independent, not loyal to 1 studio-agents became more powerful in making deals with studio for their talent
- some important films that don’t follow this corporate, money making system
- Hollywood is not focused on art-American movies didn’t claim to be art-a popular entertainment, not an art form-but despite this generalization, there have been exceptions, especially in indie films
- indies and foreign films
- cineplexation of America instead of just 1 screen
- studios hanging-now financing and distributing agencies-get together money to make a film, then distribute a film-the actual work of production not really done by them, 1000s of other companies-wardrobe, cinematography, payroll, sets, etc.-back in Golden Age, studios did everything
- film vs. TV-were in competition, now cooperation
- home video
- products
- audience
- regulation of film diff
- digitalization
- internet
Indies
- films made outside Hollywood studio system-usually lower budget, no movie stars (except sometimes-if want to make art-will work for less pay), mature audience, stray from tried and true success formulas of studios, more provocative, serious, character-driven-come up during awards season-put studios to shame-so studios have gotten into indie game-set up specialty divisions for indie films-ex: Focus Features (division of Universal)-sometimes indie companies will make deal with studio for distribution
- some of these are very successful, cost little and make a lot (ex: My Big Fat Greek Wedding)
- started having hard time 6-7 years ago-cuz of competition from quality TV
- some indies now rely heavily on internet, video on demand-sometimes instead of in theaters or simultaneously
foreign films
-US doesn’t pay much attention to-but lessened with rise of indies-similar audiences, subject matter, style-some foreign films do well, many don’t
cineplexation of America
- has helped indie films-given more people more access to indies, especially before internet
- cineplex: multiple screens (also called multiplex)
- started in 70s
- large movie palaces began declining-went out of business or turned into cineplex
- many in shopping malls-symbiotic relationship
- also decline of drive-in theater-25% of nation’s screens at its peak-this land could be put to more profitable use-somewhat of a comeback now-but problems now cuz Hollywood stopped distributing 35mm films to theaters-digital now-so movie theaters transitioned with studios’ help, studios didn’t help drive-in theaters with this, so many had trouble converting, went out of business
- make lots of revenue from food
- small towns last place that still sometimes have 1 screen theaters
- theaters changing-place where encouraged to spend time-drive to make theaters nicer-stadium style seating, comfy chairs that recline-also restaurants, shops, coffee shops added-movie theater=overall social experience
- luxury theaters: sofas, loveseats, side tables, waiters, wine-trying to give people a good reason to leave their home, with people’s increasingly elaborate home entertainment centers
- movie screens today bigger, use variety of technologies-wraparound screens-vibrating seats
Film vs TV
-post WWII decline in film caused by TV-that initial competition has turned into cooperation-studios saw TV as pace to recycle old films-TV networks wanted movies made for Tv-studios would make these-studios started making some shows too-this all made new revenue streams-then home video came along
home video
- VCR-movie studios would sell copy of film to store, store would rent out-this worried studios, worried people would stop going to the theaters-tried to sue but couldn’t-then started to sell films directly to public-sell-through market-especially big on family films at 1st-then in time other films
- diff financial strategies: high price to video rental places, only sell a few-increased profits-then with sell through market, price decreased, but volume high, so revenue high
- in time, by 90s, making more profits from video than theaters-2/3 movie’s profit at peak-but not anymore-w/ netflix, redbox, streaming
- direct-to-video video-sometimes a movie is never shown in theater, goes directly to video-used to be for bad movies, but then for sequels (especially for animated films)
- video will probably never kill theaters-people still go to the movies, enjoy them more at theaters than at home-when part of a crowd-a communal experience
Products
-another revenue stream for studios-selling products, toys related to films-license sale of toys related to film to many companies, so many stores will sell them0Marvel, Pokemon, Frozen, Star Wars
Audience
- at end of Golden Age-1946-4.3 billion movie tix sold in US-in 1962 1.2 billion sold-big decline-1.5 now-gone up a bit-doesn’t mean these films being seen less, just not in theaters
- the major audience for films in theaters is young people-only group who will go to same movie more than once
- -teen films tend to cost less, will give repeat business
- male teenagers used to be especially important, went to theaters the most-impatient group-like to see movie right when it comes out-opening weekend important so wield great power-core group for action, some types comedy, less affected by what critics say, but more food
- female teens are also less affected by critics and by more food-also have own power-especially in romance films, romantic comedies-like Titanic-also go to movies in packs-films aimed at girls, girl power films now-especially over the last year, power of male teens has decreased-spending more time with alternate entertainment-so females more important-films aimed at male teens not doing as well
- fastest growing audience=baby boomers-going to movies more than their parents did
the nature of film
-persuasive-high impact, high involvement medium-amazing potential to persuade-TV comes into your world-but film draws you into its world-used by nazis in Germany-but usually doesn’t attempt to persuade-less concerned with transmitting info-more for entertainment-entertains us through tried and true formulas
regulation of film
-1915 Supreme Court tules film a for-profit business, not outlet for ideas, so not protected by 1st amendment, like the press-so gov. free to censor-demand for regulation in late 20s, early 30s-film industry didn’t want gov. regulation, so decide to set up Motion Picture Protection office and code (Hays Production Code)
-all the studios agreed to submit films to Hays office to be approved-theaters only showed approved films, so no choice
-code quite strict, especially in mid 30s when Joseph Breen came in
-some leeway-could get around some, pay fine
-one of 1st people to successfully challenge code-Howard Hughes-released his non-approved film and was successful
-men coming back from war more worldly, found code ridiculous
-in 1950s, Supreme Court reversed decision-The Miracle Case-ruled film is protected by 1st amendment-Hays office limped along until it died in mid 60s
-had worked well, so sort of kept it-formed MPAA-set up self-regulatory system of film ratings that we have now-G, PG, R, X-has been revised now to G, PG, PG-13, NC-17,
-led to more adult-oriented films-more R films than other ratings-but PG-13 makes more money-bigger audiences
-
digitalization
-nature of film changing-gone digital-important to distribution of film- easier than used to be-amazing special effects can now be created-digital distribution brought huge cost savings-this was costly to change to digital though-change theaters, satellites- a lot of theaters closed down rather than pay, even though studios have helped with cost-this change is mostly complete
internet’s impact on film
-made things smoother than used to be-on demand-downloads (it’s yours, don’t need wifi) or streams (file not saved on comp.-plays from another source)-DVD business moved more towards streaming-studios prefer you to download cuz making more money-replace revenue lost from DVDs-but streaming is winning-there is a move to decrease time between movie in theaters and available online-the period has been 90 days-but now couple of weeks-movie theaters upset about this-won’t buy film to show if that period is too short